• Something wrong with this record ?

The effectiveness of avalanche airbags

P. Haegeli, M. Falk, E. Procter, B. Zweifel, F. Jarry, S. Logan, K. Kronholm, M. Biskupič, H. Brugger,

. 2014 ; 85 (9) : 1197-203. [pub] 20140606

Language English Country Ireland

Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article

AIM: Asphyxia is the primary cause of death among avalanche victims. Avalanche airbags can lower mortality by directly reducing grade of burial, the single most important factor for survival. This study aims to provide an updated perspective on the effectiveness of this safety device. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of avalanche accidents involving at least one airbag user between 1994 and 2012 in Austria, Canada, France, Norway, Slovakia, Switzerland and the United States. A multivariate analysis was used to calculate adjusted absolute risk reduction and estimate the effectiveness of airbags on grade of burial and mortality. A univariate analysis was used to examine causes of non-deployment. RESULTS: Binomial linear regression models showed main effects for airbag use, avalanche size and injuries on critical burial, and for grade of burial, injuries and avalanche size on mortality. The adjusted risk of critical burial is 47% with non-inflated airbags and 20% with inflated airbags. The adjusted mortality is 44% for critically buried victims and 3% for non-critically buried victims. The adjusted absolute mortality reduction for inflated airbags is -11 percentage points (22% to 11%; 95% confidence interval: -4 to -18 percentage points) and adjusted risk ratio is 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.29 to 0.72). Overall non-inflation rate is 20%, 60% of which is attributed to deployment failure by the user. CONCLUSION: Although the impact on survival is smaller than previously reported, these results confirm the effectiveness of airbags. Non-deployment remains the most considerable limitation to effectiveness. Development of standardized data collection protocols is encouraged to facilitate further research.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16000741
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160127105708.0
007      
ta
008      
160108s2014 ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.05.025 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24909367
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Haegeli, Pascal $u Avisualanche Consulting, 2-250 E 15th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5T 2P9, Canada; School for Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. Electronic address: pascal@avisualanche.ca.
245    14
$a The effectiveness of avalanche airbags / $c P. Haegeli, M. Falk, E. Procter, B. Zweifel, F. Jarry, S. Logan, K. Kronholm, M. Biskupič, H. Brugger,
520    9_
$a AIM: Asphyxia is the primary cause of death among avalanche victims. Avalanche airbags can lower mortality by directly reducing grade of burial, the single most important factor for survival. This study aims to provide an updated perspective on the effectiveness of this safety device. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of avalanche accidents involving at least one airbag user between 1994 and 2012 in Austria, Canada, France, Norway, Slovakia, Switzerland and the United States. A multivariate analysis was used to calculate adjusted absolute risk reduction and estimate the effectiveness of airbags on grade of burial and mortality. A univariate analysis was used to examine causes of non-deployment. RESULTS: Binomial linear regression models showed main effects for airbag use, avalanche size and injuries on critical burial, and for grade of burial, injuries and avalanche size on mortality. The adjusted risk of critical burial is 47% with non-inflated airbags and 20% with inflated airbags. The adjusted mortality is 44% for critically buried victims and 3% for non-critically buried victims. The adjusted absolute mortality reduction for inflated airbags is -11 percentage points (22% to 11%; 95% confidence interval: -4 to -18 percentage points) and adjusted risk ratio is 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.29 to 0.72). Overall non-inflation rate is 20%, 60% of which is attributed to deployment failure by the user. CONCLUSION: Although the impact on survival is smaller than previously reported, these results confirm the effectiveness of airbags. Non-deployment remains the most considerable limitation to effectiveness. Development of standardized data collection protocols is encouraged to facilitate further research.
650    12
$a airbagy $7 D017278
650    _2
$a asfyxie $x mortalita $x prevence a kontrola $7 D001237
650    12
$a laviny $7 D055875
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a multivariační analýza $7 D015999
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Falk, Markus $u Inova Q Inc., Tinkhauserstrasse 5b, 39031 Bruneck/Brunico, Italy.
700    1_
$a Procter, Emily $u EURAC Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Drususallee 1, 39100 Bozen/Bolzano, Italy.
700    1_
$a Zweifel, Benjamin $u WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, 7260 Davos, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Jarry, Frédéric $u National Association for Snow and Avalanche Studies (ANENA), 15 rue Ernest Calvat, 38000 Grenoble, France.
700    1_
$a Logan, Spencer $u Colorado Avalanche Information Center, 325 Broadway WS1, Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
700    1_
$a Kronholm, Kalle $u Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), Sognsveien 72, N-0855 Oslo, Norway.
700    1_
$a Biskupič, Marek $u Avalanche Prevention Center, Jasná, 032 51 Demänovská Dolina, Slovakia; Institute for Environmental Studies, Charles University, Ovocný trh 3-5, 116 36 Praha 1, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Brugger, Hermann $u EURAC Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Drususallee 1, 39100 Bozen/Bolzano, Italy.
773    0_
$w MED00004106 $t Resuscitation $x 1873-1570 $g Roč. 85, č. 9 (2014), s. 1197-203
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24909367 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160127105832 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1103022 $s 924947
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 85 $c 9 $d 1197-203 $e 20140606 $i 1873-1570 $m Resuscitation $n Resuscitation $x MED00004106
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160108

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...