-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Enhancement of peak and mean power in concentric phase of resistance exercises
E. Zemková, MN. Jeleň, ZC. Kováčiková, G. Ollé, TS. Vilman, DS. Hamar,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- biomechanika MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- ergometrie MeSH
- kosterní svaly fyziologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- náhodné rozdělení MeSH
- odporový trénink * MeSH
- svalová síla * MeSH
- vzpírání fyziologie MeSH
- zátěžový test MeSH
- zrychlení MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
The study compares the differences in peak and mean power of concentric-only and countermovement resistance exercises (ΔP) with different weights. A group of 27 fit men randomly performed 3 repetitions of either barbell bench presses or barbell squats on different days. The initial weight of 20 kg was increased by 10 or 5 kg (at higher loads) up to at least 85% of a previously established 1 repetition maximum (1RM). A computer-based system FiTRO Dyne Premium was used to monitor force and velocity and to calculate power. The peak values and mean values of power during the entire concentric phase of lifting and during the acceleration phase were analyzed. Results showed that maximal ΔP calculated from the peak and mean values in the acceleration phase of bench presses was achieved at lower weights (118.4 ± 19.0 W at 47% of 1RM and 116.2 ± 15.3 W at 48% of 1RM, respectively) than the one calculated from mean values in the entire concentric phase of lifting (114.8 ± 14.8 W at 57% 1RM). Likewise, maximal ΔP calculated from the peak and mean values in the acceleration phase of squats was achieved at lower weights (127.7 ± 20.4 W at 67% of 1RM and 124.3 ± 22.1 W at 69% of 1RM, respectively) than the one calculated from the mean values in the entire concentric phase of lifting (125.0 ± 19.2 W at 77% of 1RM). This fact has to be taken into account when training efficiency is evaluated, namely, in sports requiring the production of maximal force in a short time.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16000766
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160126104216.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160108s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000517 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24787676
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Zemková, Erika $u 1Department of Sports Kinanthropology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia; and 2Department of Natural Sciences in Kinanthropology, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Enhancement of peak and mean power in concentric phase of resistance exercises / $c E. Zemková, MN. Jeleň, ZC. Kováčiková, G. Ollé, TS. Vilman, DS. Hamar,
- 520 9_
- $a The study compares the differences in peak and mean power of concentric-only and countermovement resistance exercises (ΔP) with different weights. A group of 27 fit men randomly performed 3 repetitions of either barbell bench presses or barbell squats on different days. The initial weight of 20 kg was increased by 10 or 5 kg (at higher loads) up to at least 85% of a previously established 1 repetition maximum (1RM). A computer-based system FiTRO Dyne Premium was used to monitor force and velocity and to calculate power. The peak values and mean values of power during the entire concentric phase of lifting and during the acceleration phase were analyzed. Results showed that maximal ΔP calculated from the peak and mean values in the acceleration phase of bench presses was achieved at lower weights (118.4 ± 19.0 W at 47% of 1RM and 116.2 ± 15.3 W at 48% of 1RM, respectively) than the one calculated from mean values in the entire concentric phase of lifting (114.8 ± 14.8 W at 57% 1RM). Likewise, maximal ΔP calculated from the peak and mean values in the acceleration phase of squats was achieved at lower weights (127.7 ± 20.4 W at 67% of 1RM and 124.3 ± 22.1 W at 69% of 1RM, respectively) than the one calculated from the mean values in the entire concentric phase of lifting (125.0 ± 19.2 W at 77% of 1RM). This fact has to be taken into account when training efficiency is evaluated, namely, in sports requiring the production of maximal force in a short time.
- 650 _2
- $a zrychlení $7 D000054
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a ergometrie $7 D016552
- 650 _2
- $a zátěžový test $7 D005080
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a svalová síla $7 D053580
- 650 _2
- $a kosterní svaly $x fyziologie $7 D018482
- 650 _2
- $a náhodné rozdělení $7 D011897
- 650 12
- $a odporový trénink $7 D055070
- 650 _2
- $a vzpírání $x fyziologie $7 D014891
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Jeleň, Michal N
- 700 1_
- $a Kováčiková, Zuzana C
- 700 1_
- $a Ollé, Gábor
- 700 1_
- $a Vilman, Tomáš S
- 700 1_
- $a Hamar, Dušan S
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008742 $t Journal of strength and conditioning research National Strength & Conditioning Association $x 1533-4287 $g Roč. 28, č. 10 (2014), s. 2919-26
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24787676 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160126104339 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1103047 $s 924972
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 28 $c 10 $d 2919-26 $i 1533-4287 $m Journal of strength and conditioning research $n J Strength Cond Res $x MED00008742
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160108