-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study
B. Wirleitner, M. Schuff, P. Vanderzwalmen, A. Stecher, J. Okhowat, L. Hradecký, T. Kohoutek, M. Králícková, D. Spitzer, NH. Zech,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2003-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2003
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2003
Free Medical Journals
od 2003
PubMed Central
od 2003
Europe PubMed Central
od 2003
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2003-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2003-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2003-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2003-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2003
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2003-12-01
- MeSH
- blastocysta účinky léků MeSH
- choriogonadotropin farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- narození živého dítěte MeSH
- porodnost MeSH
- přenos embrya metody MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- úhrn těhotenství na počet žen v reprodukčním věku * MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Successful embryo implantation depends on a well-timed maternal-embryonic crosstalk. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) secreted by the embryo is known to play a key role in this process and to trigger a complex signal transduction cascade allowing the apposition, attachment, and invasion of the embryo into the decidualized uterus. Production of hCG was reported to be dependent on blastocyst quality and several articles suggested that intrauterine hCG injection increases pregnancy and implantation rates in IVF patients. However, no study has as yet analysed birth rates as final outcome. Our objective was to determine whether clinical outcome after blastocyst transfer can be improved by intrauterine injection of hCG and whether this is dependent on blastocyst quality. METHODS: A prospective randomised study was conducted in two settings. In cohort A, hCG application was performed two days before blastocyst transfer. In cohort B, the administration of hCG occurred just prior to embryo transfer on day 5. For both cohorts, patients were randomised to either intrauterine hCG application or to the control group that received culture medium. Clinical outcome was analysed according to blastocyst quality of transferred embryos. RESULTS: The outcome of 182 IVF-cycles (cohort A) and 1004 IVF-cycles (cohort B) was analysed. All patients received a fresh autologous blastocyst transfer on day five. Primary outcomes were pregnancy rates (PR), clinical pregnancy rates (cPR), miscarriage rates (MR), and live birth rates (LBR). No improvement of clinical outcome after intrauterine hCG administration on day 3 (cohort A) or day 5 (cohort B) was found, independently of blastocyst quality transferred. The final outcome in cohort A: LBR after transfer of top blastocysts was 50.0 % with hCG and 53.3 % in the control group. With non-top blastocysts, LBR of 17.1 % (hCG) and 18.2 % (control) were observed (n.s.). In cohort B, LBR with top blastocysts was 53.3 % (hCG) and 48.4 % (control), with non-top blastocysts it came to 28.7 % (hCG) and 35.0 % (control). The differences between the groups were statistically not significant. Furthermore, we investigated a possible benefit of hCG administration in correlation with female age. In both age groups (<38 years and ≥ 38 years) we found similar LBR after treatment with hCG vs. medium. A LBR of 47.1 % vs. 48.7 % was obtained in the younger group and 26.6 % vs. 30.8 % in the older group. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies indicating a substantial benefit from intrauterine hCG application in cleavage stage embryo transfers, in our study we could not find any evidence for improvement of clinical outcome in blastocyst transfer cycles, neither with top nor with non-top quality morphology.
IVF Centers Prof Zech B Smetany 2 30100 Pilsen Czech Republic
IVF Centers Prof Zech Innsbrucker Bundesstr 35 5020 Salzburg Austria
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16010054
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160418103958.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160408s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12958-015-0069-1 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12958-015-0069-1 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26141379
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Wirleitner, Barbara $u IVF Centers Prof. Zech, Römerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria. b.wirleitner@ivf.at.
- 245 10
- $a Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study / $c B. Wirleitner, M. Schuff, P. Vanderzwalmen, A. Stecher, J. Okhowat, L. Hradecký, T. Kohoutek, M. Králícková, D. Spitzer, NH. Zech,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Successful embryo implantation depends on a well-timed maternal-embryonic crosstalk. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) secreted by the embryo is known to play a key role in this process and to trigger a complex signal transduction cascade allowing the apposition, attachment, and invasion of the embryo into the decidualized uterus. Production of hCG was reported to be dependent on blastocyst quality and several articles suggested that intrauterine hCG injection increases pregnancy and implantation rates in IVF patients. However, no study has as yet analysed birth rates as final outcome. Our objective was to determine whether clinical outcome after blastocyst transfer can be improved by intrauterine injection of hCG and whether this is dependent on blastocyst quality. METHODS: A prospective randomised study was conducted in two settings. In cohort A, hCG application was performed two days before blastocyst transfer. In cohort B, the administration of hCG occurred just prior to embryo transfer on day 5. For both cohorts, patients were randomised to either intrauterine hCG application or to the control group that received culture medium. Clinical outcome was analysed according to blastocyst quality of transferred embryos. RESULTS: The outcome of 182 IVF-cycles (cohort A) and 1004 IVF-cycles (cohort B) was analysed. All patients received a fresh autologous blastocyst transfer on day five. Primary outcomes were pregnancy rates (PR), clinical pregnancy rates (cPR), miscarriage rates (MR), and live birth rates (LBR). No improvement of clinical outcome after intrauterine hCG administration on day 3 (cohort A) or day 5 (cohort B) was found, independently of blastocyst quality transferred. The final outcome in cohort A: LBR after transfer of top blastocysts was 50.0 % with hCG and 53.3 % in the control group. With non-top blastocysts, LBR of 17.1 % (hCG) and 18.2 % (control) were observed (n.s.). In cohort B, LBR with top blastocysts was 53.3 % (hCG) and 48.4 % (control), with non-top blastocysts it came to 28.7 % (hCG) and 35.0 % (control). The differences between the groups were statistically not significant. Furthermore, we investigated a possible benefit of hCG administration in correlation with female age. In both age groups (<38 years and ≥ 38 years) we found similar LBR after treatment with hCG vs. medium. A LBR of 47.1 % vs. 48.7 % was obtained in the younger group and 26.6 % vs. 30.8 % in the older group. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies indicating a substantial benefit from intrauterine hCG application in cleavage stage embryo transfers, in our study we could not find any evidence for improvement of clinical outcome in blastocyst transfer cycles, neither with top nor with non-top quality morphology.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a porodnost $7 D001723
- 650 _2
- $a blastocysta $x účinky léků $7 D001755
- 650 _2
- $a choriogonadotropin $x farmakologie $x terapeutické užití $7 D006063
- 650 _2
- $a přenos embrya $x metody $7 D004624
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a narození živého dítěte $7 D050498
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 12
- $a úhrn těhotenství na počet žen v reprodukčním věku $7 D018873
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Schuff, Maximilian $u IVF Centers Prof. Zech, Römerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria. m.schuff@ivf.at.
- 700 1_
- $a Vanderzwalmen, Pierre $u IVF Centers Prof. Zech, Römerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria. pierrevdz@hotmail.com. Centre Hospitalier Inter Régional Edith Cavell (CHIREC), Braine-l'Alleud, Bruxelles, Belgium. pierrevdz@hotmail.com.
- 700 1_
- $a Stecher, Astrid $u IVF Centers Prof. Zech, Römerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria. a.stecher@ivf.at.
- 700 1_
- $a Okhowat, Jasmin $u IVF Centers Prof. Zech, Römerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria. j.okhowat@ivf.at.
- 700 1_
- $a Hradecký, Libor $u IVF Centers Prof. Zech, B. Smetany 2, 30100, Pilsen, Czech Republic. l.hradecky@ivf-institut.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Kohoutek, Tomáš $u IVF Centers Prof. Zech, B. Smetany 2, 30100, Pilsen, Czech Republic. t.kohoutek@ivf-institut.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Králícková, Milena $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Charles University in Prague - Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Karlovarská 48, 30166, Pilsen, Czech Republic. Milena.Kralickova@lfp.cuni.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Spitzer, Dietmar $u IVF Centers Prof. Zech, Innsbrucker Bundesstr. 35, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. d.spitzer@salzburg.ivf.at.
- 700 1_
- $a Zech, Nicolas H $u IVF Centers Prof. Zech, Römerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria. n.zech@ivf.at.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008251 $t Reproductive biology and endocrinology RB&E $x 1477-7827 $g Roč. 13, č. - (2015), s. 70
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26141379 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160408 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160418104045 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1113483 $s 934422
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 13 $c - $d 70 $e 20150704 $i 1477-7827 $m Reproductive biology and endocrinology $n Reprod Biol Endocrinol $x MED00008251
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160408