Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Disentangling the diversity of arboreal ant communities in tropical forest trees

P. Klimes, P. Fibich, C. Idigel, M. Rimandai,

. 2015 ; 10 (2) : e0117853. [pub] 20150225

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Tropical canopies are known for their high abundance and diversity of ants. However, the factors which enable coexistence of so many species in trees, and in particular, the role of foragers in determining local diversity, are not well understood. We censused nesting and foraging arboreal ant communities in two 0.32 ha plots of primary and secondary lowland rainforest in New Guinea and explored their species diversity and composition. Null models were used to test if the records of species foraging (but not nesting) in a tree were dependent on the spatial distribution of nests in surrounding trees. In total, 102 ant species from 389 trees occurred in the primary plot compared with only 50 species from 295 trees in the secondary forest plot. However, there was only a small difference in mean ant richness per tree between primary and secondary forest (3.8 and 3.3 sp. respectively) and considerably lower richness per tree was found only when nests were considered (1.5 sp. in both forests). About half of foraging individuals collected in a tree belonged to species which were not nesting in that tree. Null models showed that the ants foraging but not nesting in a tree are more likely to nest in nearby trees than would be expected at random. The effects of both forest stage and tree size traits were similar regardless of whether only foragers, only nests, or both datasets combined were considered. However, relative abundance distributions of species differed between foraging and nesting communities. The primary forest plot was dominated by native ant species, whereas invasive species were common in secondary forest. This study demonstrates the high contribution of foragers to arboreal ant diversity, indicating an important role of connectivity between trees, and also highlights the importance of primary vegetation for the conservation of native ant communities.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16010521
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160408112353.0
007      
ta
008      
160408s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0117853 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0117853 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25714831
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Klimes, Petr $u Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic; Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Disentangling the diversity of arboreal ant communities in tropical forest trees / $c P. Klimes, P. Fibich, C. Idigel, M. Rimandai,
520    9_
$a Tropical canopies are known for their high abundance and diversity of ants. However, the factors which enable coexistence of so many species in trees, and in particular, the role of foragers in determining local diversity, are not well understood. We censused nesting and foraging arboreal ant communities in two 0.32 ha plots of primary and secondary lowland rainforest in New Guinea and explored their species diversity and composition. Null models were used to test if the records of species foraging (but not nesting) in a tree were dependent on the spatial distribution of nests in surrounding trees. In total, 102 ant species from 389 trees occurred in the primary plot compared with only 50 species from 295 trees in the secondary forest plot. However, there was only a small difference in mean ant richness per tree between primary and secondary forest (3.8 and 3.3 sp. respectively) and considerably lower richness per tree was found only when nests were considered (1.5 sp. in both forests). About half of foraging individuals collected in a tree belonged to species which were not nesting in that tree. Null models showed that the ants foraging but not nesting in a tree are more likely to nest in nearby trees than would be expected at random. The effects of both forest stage and tree size traits were similar regardless of whether only foragers, only nests, or both datasets combined were considered. However, relative abundance distributions of species differed between foraging and nesting communities. The primary forest plot was dominated by native ant species, whereas invasive species were common in secondary forest. This study demonstrates the high contribution of foragers to arboreal ant diversity, indicating an important role of connectivity between trees, and also highlights the importance of primary vegetation for the conservation of native ant communities.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a Formicidae $7 D001000
650    _2
$a chování zvířat $7 D001522
650    12
$a biodiverzita $7 D044822
650    _2
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    12
$a lesy $7 D065928
650    _2
$a deštný prales $7 D065947
650    12
$a stromy $7 D014197
650    12
$a tropické klima $7 D014329
651    _2
$a Nová Guinea $7 D009512
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Fibich, Pavel $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Idigel, Cliffson $u New Guinea Binatang Research Center, Madang, Papua New Guinea.
700    1_
$a Rimandai, Maling $u New Guinea Binatang Research Center, Madang, Papua New Guinea.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 10, č. 2 (2015), s. e0117853
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25714831 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160408112431 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1113950 $s 934889
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 10 $c 2 $d e0117853 $e 20150225 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160408

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...