Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Interval versus continuous training with identical workload: physiological and aerobic capacity adaptations

G. G. de Araujo, C. A. Gobatto, M. Marcos-Pereira, I. G. Dos Reis, R. Verlengia

. 2015 ; 64 (2) : 209-219. [pub] 20141015

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The interval model training has been more recommended to promote aerobic adaptations due to recovery period that enables the execution of elevated intensity and as consequence, higher workload in relation to continuous training. However, the physiological and aerobic capacity adaptations in interval training with identical workload to continuous are still uncertain. The purpose was to characterize the effects of chronic and acute biomarkers adaptations and aerobic capacity in interval and continuous protocols with equivalent load. Fifty Wistar rats were divided in three groups: Continuous training (GTC), interval training (GTI) and control (CG). The running training lasted 8 weeks (wk) and was based at Anaerobic Threshold (AT) velocity. GTI showed glycogen super-compensation (mg/100 mg) 48 h after training session in relation to CG and GTC (GTI red gastrocnemius (RG)=1.41+/-0.16; GTI white gastrocnemius (WG)=1.78+/-0.20; GTI soleus (S)=0.26+/-0.01; GTI liver (L)=2.72+/-0.36; GTC RG=0.42+/-0.17; GTC WG=0.54+/-0.22; GTC S=0.100+/-0.01; GTC L=1.12+/-0.24; CG RG=0.32+/-0.05; CG WG=0.65+/-0.17; CG S=0.14+/-0.01; CG L=2.28+/-0.33). The volume performed by GTI was higher than GTC. The aerobic capacity reduced 11 % after experimental period in GTC when compared to GTI, but this change was insignificant (19.6+/-5.4 m/min; 17.7+/-2.5 m/min, effect size = 0.59). Free fatty acids and glucose concentration did not show statistical differences among the groups. Corticosterone concentration increased in acute condition for GTI and GTC. Testosterone concentration reduced 71 % in GTC immediately after the exercise in comparison to CG. The GTI allowed positive adaptations when compared to GTC in relation to: glycogen super-compensation, training volume performed and anabolic condition. However, the GTI not improved the aerobic performance.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16013798
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160531084035.0
007      
ta
008      
160506s2015 xr d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.33549/physiolres.932693 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25317688
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Araujo, G. G. de $u Laboratory of Sport Applied Physiology, Campinas State University, UNICAMP – FCA, Limeira SP, Brazil; Sports Science Research Group, Federal University of Alagoas, UFAL/PPGNUT/ Physical Education – Maceio AL, Brazil $7 gn_A_00008035
245    10
$a Interval versus continuous training with identical workload: physiological and aerobic capacity adaptations / $c G. G. de Araujo, C. A. Gobatto, M. Marcos-Pereira, I. G. Dos Reis, R. Verlengia
520    9_
$a The interval model training has been more recommended to promote aerobic adaptations due to recovery period that enables the execution of elevated intensity and as consequence, higher workload in relation to continuous training. However, the physiological and aerobic capacity adaptations in interval training with identical workload to continuous are still uncertain. The purpose was to characterize the effects of chronic and acute biomarkers adaptations and aerobic capacity in interval and continuous protocols with equivalent load. Fifty Wistar rats were divided in three groups: Continuous training (GTC), interval training (GTI) and control (CG). The running training lasted 8 weeks (wk) and was based at Anaerobic Threshold (AT) velocity. GTI showed glycogen super-compensation (mg/100 mg) 48 h after training session in relation to CG and GTC (GTI red gastrocnemius (RG)=1.41+/-0.16; GTI white gastrocnemius (WG)=1.78+/-0.20; GTI soleus (S)=0.26+/-0.01; GTI liver (L)=2.72+/-0.36; GTC RG=0.42+/-0.17; GTC WG=0.54+/-0.22; GTC S=0.100+/-0.01; GTC L=1.12+/-0.24; CG RG=0.32+/-0.05; CG WG=0.65+/-0.17; CG S=0.14+/-0.01; CG L=2.28+/-0.33). The volume performed by GTI was higher than GTC. The aerobic capacity reduced 11 % after experimental period in GTC when compared to GTI, but this change was insignificant (19.6+/-5.4 m/min; 17.7+/-2.5 m/min, effect size = 0.59). Free fatty acids and glucose concentration did not show statistical differences among the groups. Corticosterone concentration increased in acute condition for GTI and GTC. Testosterone concentration reduced 71 % in GTC immediately after the exercise in comparison to CG. The GTI allowed positive adaptations when compared to GTC in relation to: glycogen super-compensation, training volume performed and anabolic condition. However, the GTI not improved the aerobic performance.
650    _2
$a fyziologická adaptace $x fyziologie $7 D000222
650    _2
$a aerobióza $x fyziologie $7 D000332
650    _2
$a anaerobní práh $x fyziologie $7 D015308
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a tělesná hmotnost $x fyziologie $7 D001835
650    _2
$a kortikosteron $x metabolismus $7 D003345
650    _2
$a kyseliny mastné neesterifikované $x metabolismus $7 D005230
650    _2
$a glukosa $x metabolismus $7 D005947
650    _2
$a glykogen $x metabolismus $7 D006003
650    _2
$a játra $x fyziologie $7 D008099
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a kosterní svaly $x fyziologie $7 D018482
650    _2
$a kondiční příprava zvířat $x fyziologie $7 D010805
650    _2
$a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
650    _2
$a potkani Wistar $7 D017208
650    _2
$a běh $x fyziologie $7 D012420
650    _2
$a testosteron $x metabolismus $7 D013739
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Gobatto, C. A. $u Laboratory of Sport Applied Physiology, Campinas State University, UNICAMP – FCA, Limeira SP, Brazil
700    1_
$a Marcos-Pereira, M. $u Physical Education, Faculty of Sciences of Health, Methodist University of Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
700    1_
$a Dos Reis, I. G. M. $u Laboratory of Sport Applied Physiology, Campinas State University, UNICAMP – FCA, Limeira SP, Brazil
700    1_
$a Verlengia, R. $u Physical Education, Faculty of Sciences of Health, Methodist University of Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
773    0_
$w MED00003824 $t Physiological research Academia Scientiarum Bohemoslovaca $x 1802-9973 $g Roč. 64, č. 2 (2015), s. 209-219
856    41
$u http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/ $y domovská stránka časopisu
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 4120 $c 266 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20160506 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160520141203 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1126049 $s 938210
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 64 $c 2 $d 209-219 $e 20141015 $i 1802-9973 $m Physiological research $n Physiol. Res. (Print) $x MED00003824
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20160506

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...