-
Something wrong with this record ?
Modeling Semantic Emotion Space Using a 3D Hypercube-Projection: An Innovative Analytical Approach for the Psychology of Emotions
R. Trnka, A. Lačev, K. Balcar, M. Kuška, P. Tavel,
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2010
Free Medical Journals
from 2010
PubMed Central
from 2010
Europe PubMed Central
from 2010
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2010
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The widely accepted two-dimensional circumplex model of emotions posits that most instances of human emotional experience can be understood within the two general dimensions of valence and activation. Currently, this model is facing some criticism, because complex emotions in particular are hard to define within only these two general dimensions. The present theory-driven study introduces an innovative analytical approach working in a way other than the conventional, two-dimensional paradigm. The main goal was to map and project semantic emotion space in terms of mutual positions of various emotion prototypical categories. Participants (N = 187; 54.5% females) judged 16 discrete emotions in terms of valence, intensity, controllability and utility. The results revealed that these four dimensional input measures were uncorrelated. This implies that valence, intensity, controllability and utility represented clearly different qualities of discrete emotions in the judgments of the participants. Based on this data, we constructed a 3D hypercube-projection and compared it with various two-dimensional projections. This contrasting enabled us to detect several sources of bias when working with the traditional, two-dimensional analytical approach. Contrasting two-dimensional and three-dimensional projections revealed that the 2D models provided biased insights about how emotions are conceptually related to one another along multiple dimensions. The results of the present study point out the reductionist nature of the two-dimensional paradigm in the psychological theory of emotions and challenge the widely accepted circumplex model.
Faculty of Humanities Charles University PraguePrague Czech Republic
Olomouc University Social Health Institute Palacky University in Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
Olomouc University Social Health Institute Palacky University in OlomoucOlomouc Czech Republic
Science and Research Department Prague College of Psychosocial Studies Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16019932
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160726103501.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160722s2016 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00522 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00522 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27148130
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Trnka, Radek $u Science and Research Department, Prague College of Psychosocial Studies (PVSPS)Prague, Czech Republic; Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in PraguePrague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Modeling Semantic Emotion Space Using a 3D Hypercube-Projection: An Innovative Analytical Approach for the Psychology of Emotions / $c R. Trnka, A. Lačev, K. Balcar, M. Kuška, P. Tavel,
- 520 9_
- $a The widely accepted two-dimensional circumplex model of emotions posits that most instances of human emotional experience can be understood within the two general dimensions of valence and activation. Currently, this model is facing some criticism, because complex emotions in particular are hard to define within only these two general dimensions. The present theory-driven study introduces an innovative analytical approach working in a way other than the conventional, two-dimensional paradigm. The main goal was to map and project semantic emotion space in terms of mutual positions of various emotion prototypical categories. Participants (N = 187; 54.5% females) judged 16 discrete emotions in terms of valence, intensity, controllability and utility. The results revealed that these four dimensional input measures were uncorrelated. This implies that valence, intensity, controllability and utility represented clearly different qualities of discrete emotions in the judgments of the participants. Based on this data, we constructed a 3D hypercube-projection and compared it with various two-dimensional projections. This contrasting enabled us to detect several sources of bias when working with the traditional, two-dimensional analytical approach. Contrasting two-dimensional and three-dimensional projections revealed that the 2D models provided biased insights about how emotions are conceptually related to one another along multiple dimensions. The results of the present study point out the reductionist nature of the two-dimensional paradigm in the psychological theory of emotions and challenge the widely accepted circumplex model.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Lačev, Alek $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University in Olomouc Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Balcar, Karel $u Science and Research Department, Prague College of Psychosocial Studies (PVSPS) Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kuška, Martin $u Science and Research Department, Prague College of Psychosocial Studies (PVSPS) Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Tavel, Peter $u Science and Research Department, Prague College of Psychosocial Studies (PVSPS)Prague, Czech Republic; Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University in OlomoucOlomouc, Czech Republic; Health Psychology Unit - Institute of Public Health, Medical Faculty, P. J. Safarik UniversityKosice, Slovakia.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00174603 $t Frontiers in psychology $x 1664-1078 $g Roč. 7, č. - (2016), s. 522
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27148130 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160722 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160726103721 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1154602 $s 944460
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 7 $c - $d 522 $e 20160419 $i 1664-1078 $m Frontiers in psychology $n Front Psychol $x MED00174603
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160722