-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Cell Tracking Accuracy Measurement Based on Comparison of Acyclic Oriented Graphs
P. Matula, M. Maška, DV. Sorokin, P. Matula, C. Ortiz-de-Solórzano, M. Kozubek,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2006
Free Medical Journals
od 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
od 2006
PubMed Central
od 2006
Europe PubMed Central
od 2006
ProQuest Central
od 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
- MeSH
- algoritmy MeSH
- buněčné linie MeSH
- buněčný tracking metody MeSH
- časosběrné zobrazování metody MeSH
- fluorescenční mikroskopie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
Tracking motile cells in time-lapse series is challenging and is required in many biomedical applications. Cell tracks can be mathematically represented as acyclic oriented graphs. Their vertices describe the spatio-temporal locations of individual cells, whereas the edges represent temporal relationships between them. Such a representation maintains the knowledge of all important cellular events within a captured field of view, such as migration, division, death, and transit through the field of view. The increasing number of cell tracking algorithms calls for comparison of their performance. However, the lack of a standardized cell tracking accuracy measure makes the comparison impracticable. This paper defines and evaluates an accuracy measure for objective and systematic benchmarking of cell tracking algorithms. The measure assumes the existence of a ground-truth reference, and assesses how difficult it is to transform a computed graph into the reference one. The difficulty is measured as a weighted sum of the lowest number of graph operations, such as split, delete, and add a vertex and delete, add, and alter the semantics of an edge, needed to make the graphs identical. The measure behavior is extensively analyzed based on the tracking results provided by the participants of the first Cell Tracking Challenge hosted by the 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. We demonstrate the robustness and stability of the measure against small changes in the choice of weights for diverse cell tracking algorithms and fluorescence microscopy datasets. As the measure penalizes all possible errors in the tracking results and is easy to compute, it may especially help developers and analysts to tune their algorithms according to their needs.
Cancer Imaging Laboratory Center for Applied Medical Research University of Navarra Pamplona Spain
Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Faculty of Informatics Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16020082
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160722115928.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160722s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0144959 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0144959 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26683608
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Matula, Pavel $u Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Molecular Cytology and Cytometry, Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Cell Tracking Accuracy Measurement Based on Comparison of Acyclic Oriented Graphs / $c P. Matula, M. Maška, DV. Sorokin, P. Matula, C. Ortiz-de-Solórzano, M. Kozubek,
- 520 9_
- $a Tracking motile cells in time-lapse series is challenging and is required in many biomedical applications. Cell tracks can be mathematically represented as acyclic oriented graphs. Their vertices describe the spatio-temporal locations of individual cells, whereas the edges represent temporal relationships between them. Such a representation maintains the knowledge of all important cellular events within a captured field of view, such as migration, division, death, and transit through the field of view. The increasing number of cell tracking algorithms calls for comparison of their performance. However, the lack of a standardized cell tracking accuracy measure makes the comparison impracticable. This paper defines and evaluates an accuracy measure for objective and systematic benchmarking of cell tracking algorithms. The measure assumes the existence of a ground-truth reference, and assesses how difficult it is to transform a computed graph into the reference one. The difficulty is measured as a weighted sum of the lowest number of graph operations, such as split, delete, and add a vertex and delete, add, and alter the semantics of an edge, needed to make the graphs identical. The measure behavior is extensively analyzed based on the tracking results provided by the participants of the first Cell Tracking Challenge hosted by the 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. We demonstrate the robustness and stability of the measure against small changes in the choice of weights for diverse cell tracking algorithms and fluorescence microscopy datasets. As the measure penalizes all possible errors in the tracking results and is easy to compute, it may especially help developers and analysts to tune their algorithms according to their needs.
- 650 _2
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a buněčné linie $7 D002460
- 650 _2
- $a buněčný tracking $x metody $7 D058948
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a fluorescenční mikroskopie $7 D008856
- 650 _2
- $a časosběrné zobrazování $x metody $7 D059008
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Maška, Martin $u Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sorokin, Dmitry V $u Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Matula, Petr $u Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Ortiz-de-Solórzano, Carlos $u Cancer Imaging Laboratory, Center for Applied Medical Research, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Kozubek, Michal $u Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 10, č. 12 (2015), s. e0144959
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26683608 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160722 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160722120142 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1154752 $s 944610
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 10 $c 12 $d e0144959 $e 20151218 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160722