• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Cell Tracking Accuracy Measurement Based on Comparison of Acyclic Oriented Graphs

P. Matula, M. Maška, DV. Sorokin, P. Matula, C. Ortiz-de-Solórzano, M. Kozubek,

. 2015 ; 10 (12) : e0144959. [pub] 20151218

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16020082

Tracking motile cells in time-lapse series is challenging and is required in many biomedical applications. Cell tracks can be mathematically represented as acyclic oriented graphs. Their vertices describe the spatio-temporal locations of individual cells, whereas the edges represent temporal relationships between them. Such a representation maintains the knowledge of all important cellular events within a captured field of view, such as migration, division, death, and transit through the field of view. The increasing number of cell tracking algorithms calls for comparison of their performance. However, the lack of a standardized cell tracking accuracy measure makes the comparison impracticable. This paper defines and evaluates an accuracy measure for objective and systematic benchmarking of cell tracking algorithms. The measure assumes the existence of a ground-truth reference, and assesses how difficult it is to transform a computed graph into the reference one. The difficulty is measured as a weighted sum of the lowest number of graph operations, such as split, delete, and add a vertex and delete, add, and alter the semantics of an edge, needed to make the graphs identical. The measure behavior is extensively analyzed based on the tracking results provided by the participants of the first Cell Tracking Challenge hosted by the 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. We demonstrate the robustness and stability of the measure against small changes in the choice of weights for diverse cell tracking algorithms and fluorescence microscopy datasets. As the measure penalizes all possible errors in the tracking results and is easy to compute, it may especially help developers and analysts to tune their algorithms according to their needs.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16020082
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160722115928.0
007      
ta
008      
160722s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0144959 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0144959 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26683608
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Matula, Pavel $u Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Molecular Cytology and Cytometry, Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Cell Tracking Accuracy Measurement Based on Comparison of Acyclic Oriented Graphs / $c P. Matula, M. Maška, DV. Sorokin, P. Matula, C. Ortiz-de-Solórzano, M. Kozubek,
520    9_
$a Tracking motile cells in time-lapse series is challenging and is required in many biomedical applications. Cell tracks can be mathematically represented as acyclic oriented graphs. Their vertices describe the spatio-temporal locations of individual cells, whereas the edges represent temporal relationships between them. Such a representation maintains the knowledge of all important cellular events within a captured field of view, such as migration, division, death, and transit through the field of view. The increasing number of cell tracking algorithms calls for comparison of their performance. However, the lack of a standardized cell tracking accuracy measure makes the comparison impracticable. This paper defines and evaluates an accuracy measure for objective and systematic benchmarking of cell tracking algorithms. The measure assumes the existence of a ground-truth reference, and assesses how difficult it is to transform a computed graph into the reference one. The difficulty is measured as a weighted sum of the lowest number of graph operations, such as split, delete, and add a vertex and delete, add, and alter the semantics of an edge, needed to make the graphs identical. The measure behavior is extensively analyzed based on the tracking results provided by the participants of the first Cell Tracking Challenge hosted by the 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. We demonstrate the robustness and stability of the measure against small changes in the choice of weights for diverse cell tracking algorithms and fluorescence microscopy datasets. As the measure penalizes all possible errors in the tracking results and is easy to compute, it may especially help developers and analysts to tune their algorithms according to their needs.
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a buněčné linie $7 D002460
650    _2
$a buněčný tracking $x metody $7 D058948
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a fluorescenční mikroskopie $7 D008856
650    _2
$a časosběrné zobrazování $x metody $7 D059008
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Maška, Martin $u Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sorokin, Dmitry V $u Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Matula, Petr $u Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ortiz-de-Solórzano, Carlos $u Cancer Imaging Laboratory, Center for Applied Medical Research, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
700    1_
$a Kozubek, Michal $u Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 10, č. 12 (2015), s. e0144959
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26683608 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160722 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160722120142 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1154752 $s 944610
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 10 $c 12 $d e0144959 $e 20151218 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160722

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace