• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

To each its own: differential response of specialist and generalist herbivores to plant defence in willows

M. Volf, J. Hrcek, R. Julkunen-Tiitto, V. Novotny,

. 2015 ; 84 (4) : 1123-32. [pub] 20150303

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16020981

Plant-insect food webs tend to be dominated by interactions resulting from diffuse co-evolution between plants and multiple lineages of herbivores rather than by reciprocal co-evolution and co-cladogenesis. Plants therefore require defence strategies effective against a broad range of herbivore species. In one extreme, plants could develop a single universal defence effective against all herbivorous insects, or tailor-made strategies for each herbivore species. The evolution and ecology of plant defence has to be studied with entire insect assemblages, rather than small subsets of pairwise interactions. The present study examines whether specialists and generalists in three coexisting insect lineages, forming the leaf-chewing guild, respond uniformly to plant phylogeny, secondary metabolites, nutrient content and mechanical antiherbivore defences of their hosts, thus permitting universal plant defence strategies against specialized and generalist folivorous insects from various taxa. The extensive data on folivorous assemblages comprising three insect orders and 193 species are linked with plant phylogeny, secondary chemistry (salicylates, flavonoids and tannins), leaf morphological traits [specific leaf area (SLA) and trichome coverage], nutrient (C : N) content and growth form of eight willow (Salix) and one aspen (Populus) species growing in sympatry. Generalists responded to overall host plant chemistry and trichomes, whilst specialists responded to host plant phylogeny and secondary metabolites that are unique to willows and that are capable of being utilized as an antipredator protection. We did not find any significant impact of other plant traits, that is SLA, C : N ratio, flavonoids, tannins and growth form, on the composition of leaf-chewing communities. Our results show that the response to plant traits is differential among specialists and generalists. This finding constrains the ability of plants to develop defensive traits universally effective against herbivores and may lead to diversification of plant defensive mechanisms into several complementary syndromes, required for effective protection against generalists and specialists from multiple insect taxa comprising most leaf-chewing assemblages. These results point to the necessity of broad studies of plant-herbivore interactions, across multiple insect taxa and guilds.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16020981
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160803122233.0
007      
ta
008      
160722s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/1365-2656.12349 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1111/1365-2656.12349 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25649252
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Volf, Martin $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia and Biology Centre, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Branisovska 31, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a To each its own: differential response of specialist and generalist herbivores to plant defence in willows / $c M. Volf, J. Hrcek, R. Julkunen-Tiitto, V. Novotny,
520    9_
$a Plant-insect food webs tend to be dominated by interactions resulting from diffuse co-evolution between plants and multiple lineages of herbivores rather than by reciprocal co-evolution and co-cladogenesis. Plants therefore require defence strategies effective against a broad range of herbivore species. In one extreme, plants could develop a single universal defence effective against all herbivorous insects, or tailor-made strategies for each herbivore species. The evolution and ecology of plant defence has to be studied with entire insect assemblages, rather than small subsets of pairwise interactions. The present study examines whether specialists and generalists in three coexisting insect lineages, forming the leaf-chewing guild, respond uniformly to plant phylogeny, secondary metabolites, nutrient content and mechanical antiherbivore defences of their hosts, thus permitting universal plant defence strategies against specialized and generalist folivorous insects from various taxa. The extensive data on folivorous assemblages comprising three insect orders and 193 species are linked with plant phylogeny, secondary chemistry (salicylates, flavonoids and tannins), leaf morphological traits [specific leaf area (SLA) and trichome coverage], nutrient (C : N) content and growth form of eight willow (Salix) and one aspen (Populus) species growing in sympatry. Generalists responded to overall host plant chemistry and trichomes, whilst specialists responded to host plant phylogeny and secondary metabolites that are unique to willows and that are capable of being utilized as an antipredator protection. We did not find any significant impact of other plant traits, that is SLA, C : N ratio, flavonoids, tannins and growth form, on the composition of leaf-chewing communities. Our results show that the response to plant traits is differential among specialists and generalists. This finding constrains the ability of plants to develop defensive traits universally effective against herbivores and may lead to diversification of plant defensive mechanisms into several complementary syndromes, required for effective protection against generalists and specialists from multiple insect taxa comprising most leaf-chewing assemblages. These results point to the necessity of broad studies of plant-herbivore interactions, across multiple insect taxa and guilds.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
650    _2
$a flavonoidy $x analýza $7 D005419
650    12
$a býložravci $7 D060434
650    _2
$a hmyz $x fyziologie $7 D007313
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a listy rostlin $x anatomie a histologie $x chemie $7 D018515
650    _2
$a Populus $x anatomie a histologie $x chemie $7 D032107
650    _2
$a salicylany $x analýza $7 D012459
650    _2
$a Salix $x anatomie a histologie $x chemie $x genetika $7 D032108
650    _2
$a taniny $x analýza $7 D013634
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
655    _2
$a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. $7 D013486
700    1_
$a Hrcek, Jan $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia and Biology Centre, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Branisovska 31, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Julkunen-Tiitto, Riitta $u Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistukatu 7, Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland.
700    1_
$a Novotny, Vojtech $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia and Biology Centre, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Branisovska 31, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00007675 $t The Journal of animal ecology $x 1365-2656 $g Roč. 84, č. 4 (2015), s. 1123-32
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25649252 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160722 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160803122503 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1155651 $s 945509
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 84 $c 4 $d 1123-32 $e 20150303 $i 1365-2656 $m Journal of animal ecology $n J Anim Ecol $x MED00007675
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160722

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...