• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

European Renal Best Practice Guideline on kidney donor and recipient evaluation and perioperative care

D. Abramowicz, P. Cochat, FH. Claas, U. Heemann, J. Pascual, C. Dudley, P. Harden, M. Hourmant, U. Maggiore, M. Salvadori, G. Spasovski, JP. Squifflet, J. Steiger, A. Torres, O. Viklicky, M. Zeier, R. Vanholder, W. Van Biesen, E. Nagler,

. 2015 ; 30 (11) : 1790-7. [pub] 20140709

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, směrnice pro lékařskou praxi

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16021084

The European Best Practice Guideline group (EBPG) issued guidelines on the evaluation and selection of kidney donor and kidney transplant candidates, as well as post-transplant recipient care, in the year 2000 and 2002. The new European Renal Best Practice board decided in 2009 that these guidelines needed updating. In order to avoid duplication of efforts with kidney disease improving global outcomes, which published in 2009 clinical practice guidelines on the post-transplant care of kidney transplant recipients, we did not address these issues in the present guidelines.The guideline was developed following a rigorous methodological approach: (i) identification of clinical questions, (ii) prioritization of questions, (iii) systematic literature review and critical appraisal of available evidence and (iv) formulation of recommendations and grading according to Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). The strength of each recommendation is rated 1 or 2, with 1 being a 'We recommend' statement, and 2 being a 'We suggest' statement. In addition, each statement is assigned an overall grade for the quality of evidence: A (high), B (moderate), C (low) or D (very low). The guideline makes recommendations for the evaluation of the kidney transplant candidate as well as the potential deceased and living donor, the immunological work-up of kidney donors and recipients and perioperative recipient care.All together, the work group issued 112 statements. There were 51 (45%) recommendations graded '1', 18 (16%) were graded '2' and 43 (38%) statements were not graded. There were 0 (0%) recommendations graded '1A', 15 (13%) were '1B', 19 (17%) '1C' and 17 (15%) '1D'. None (0%) were graded '2A', 1 (0.9%) was '2B', 8 (7%) were '2C' and 9 (8%) '2D'. Limitations of the evidence, especially the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.We present here the complete recommendations about the evaluation of the kidney transplant candidate as well as the potential deceased and living donor, the immunological work-up of kidney donors and recipients and the perioperative recipient care. We hope that this document will help caregivers to improve the quality of care they deliver to patients. The full version with methods, rationale and references is published in Nephrol Dial Transplant (2013) 28: i1-i71; doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft218 and can be downloaded freely from http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/ndt/era_edta.html.

Center for Biomedical Research of the Canary Islands University of La Laguna La Laguna Spain Nephrology Service University Hospital of Canary Islands La Laguna Spain Nefrología Instituto Reina Sofía de Investigación Madrid Spain

Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation CHU Liege Liège Belgium

Department of Immunohaematology and Blood Transfusion Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands

Department of Nephrology Antwerp University Hospital Antwerp Belgium

Department of Nephrology Churchill Hospital Oxford University Oxford UK

Department of Nephrology Hospital del Mar Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Department of Nephrology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic

Department of Nephrology Klinikum rechts der Isar Munich Germany

Department of Nephrology University Hospital Ghent Ghent Belgium

Department of Nephrology University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany

Dienst Nefrologie UZ Gent Gent Belgium

Hopital Femme Mere Enfant Universite de Lyon Lyon France Service de Nephrologie Pediatrique Centre de Reference des Maladies Renales Rares Inserm U820 Faculte de medecine RTH Laennec Universite de Lyon Lyon France

Medical Faculty University Department of Nephrology Skopje Republic of Macedonia

Renal Division University Hospital Ghent Ghent Belgium

Renal Unit Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi Florence Italy

Richard Bright Renal Unit Southmead Hospital Bristol UK

Service de Nephrologie CHU Nantes Nantes Cedex France

Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland

UO Nefrologia Trapianti Rene Pancreas Parma Italy

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16021084
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230207113239.0
007      
ta
008      
160722s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/ndt/gfu216 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1093/ndt/gfu216 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25007790
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Abramowicz, Daniel $u Department of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. $7 gn_A_00000777
245    10
$a European Renal Best Practice Guideline on kidney donor and recipient evaluation and perioperative care / $c D. Abramowicz, P. Cochat, FH. Claas, U. Heemann, J. Pascual, C. Dudley, P. Harden, M. Hourmant, U. Maggiore, M. Salvadori, G. Spasovski, JP. Squifflet, J. Steiger, A. Torres, O. Viklicky, M. Zeier, R. Vanholder, W. Van Biesen, E. Nagler,
520    9_
$a The European Best Practice Guideline group (EBPG) issued guidelines on the evaluation and selection of kidney donor and kidney transplant candidates, as well as post-transplant recipient care, in the year 2000 and 2002. The new European Renal Best Practice board decided in 2009 that these guidelines needed updating. In order to avoid duplication of efforts with kidney disease improving global outcomes, which published in 2009 clinical practice guidelines on the post-transplant care of kidney transplant recipients, we did not address these issues in the present guidelines.The guideline was developed following a rigorous methodological approach: (i) identification of clinical questions, (ii) prioritization of questions, (iii) systematic literature review and critical appraisal of available evidence and (iv) formulation of recommendations and grading according to Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). The strength of each recommendation is rated 1 or 2, with 1 being a 'We recommend' statement, and 2 being a 'We suggest' statement. In addition, each statement is assigned an overall grade for the quality of evidence: A (high), B (moderate), C (low) or D (very low). The guideline makes recommendations for the evaluation of the kidney transplant candidate as well as the potential deceased and living donor, the immunological work-up of kidney donors and recipients and perioperative recipient care.All together, the work group issued 112 statements. There were 51 (45%) recommendations graded '1', 18 (16%) were graded '2' and 43 (38%) statements were not graded. There were 0 (0%) recommendations graded '1A', 15 (13%) were '1B', 19 (17%) '1C' and 17 (15%) '1D'. None (0%) were graded '2A', 1 (0.9%) was '2B', 8 (7%) were '2C' and 9 (8%) '2D'. Limitations of the evidence, especially the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.We present here the complete recommendations about the evaluation of the kidney transplant candidate as well as the potential deceased and living donor, the immunological work-up of kidney donors and recipients and the perioperative recipient care. We hope that this document will help caregivers to improve the quality of care they deliver to patients. The full version with methods, rationale and references is published in Nephrol Dial Transplant (2013) 28: i1-i71; doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft218 and can be downloaded freely from http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/ndt/era_edta.html.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a nemoci ledvin $x chirurgie $7 D007674
650    _2
$a transplantace ledvin $x normy $7 D016030
650    _2
$a perioperační péče $x normy $7 D019990
650    12
$a dárci tkání $7 D014019
650    12
$a příjemce transplantátu $7 D066027
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi $7 D017065
700    1_
$a Cochat, Pierre, $u Hopital Femme Mere Enfant, Universite de Lyon, Lyon, France Service de Nephrologie Pediatrique, Centre de Reference des Maladies Renales Rares, Inserm U820, Faculte de medecine RTH Laennec, Universite de Lyon, Lyon, France. $d 1955- $7 xx0281512
700    1_
$a Claas, Frans H J $u Department of Immunohaematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Heemann, Uwe $u Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
700    1_
$a Pascual, Julio $u Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
700    1_
$a Dudley, C $u Richard Bright Renal Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
700    1_
$a Harden, Paul $u Department of Nephrology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
700    1_
$a Hourmant, Marivonne $u Service de Nephrologie, CHU Nantes, Nantes Cedex, France.
700    1_
$a Maggiore, Umberto $u UO Nefrologia, Trapianti Rene-Pancreas, Parma, Italy.
700    1_
$a Salvadori, Maurizio $u Renal Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
700    1_
$a Spasovski, Goce $u Medical Faculty, University Department of Nephrology, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
700    1_
$a Squifflet, Jean-Paul $u Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Liege, Liège, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Steiger, Jürg $u Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Torres, Armando $u Center for Biomedical Research of the Canary Islands (CIBICAN), University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Spain Nephrology Service, University Hospital of Canary Islands, La Laguna, Spain Nefrología, Instituto Reina Sofía de Investigación, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a Viklicky, Ondrej $u Department of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zeier, Martin $u Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. $7 xx0281649
700    1_
$a Vanholder, Raymond $u Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Van Biesen, Wim $u Dienst Nefrologie, UZ Gent, Gent, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Nagler, Evi $u Renal Division, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
773    0_
$w MED00010288 $t Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation $x 1460-2385 $g Roč. 30, č. 11 (2015), s. 1790-7
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25007790 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160722 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230207113236 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1155754 $s 945612
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 30 $c 11 $d 1790-7 $e 20140709 $i 1460-2385 $m Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation $n Nephrol Dial Transplant $x MED00010288
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160722

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace