-
Something wrong with this record ?
Coronary versus carotid blood flow and coronary perfusion pressure in a pig model of prolonged cardiac arrest treated by different modes of venoarterial ECMO and intraaortic balloon counterpulsation
J. Bělohlávek, M. Mlček, M. Huptych, T. Svoboda, S. Havránek, P. Ošt'ádal, T. Bouček, T. Kovárník, F. Mlejnský, V. Mrázek, M. Bělohlávek, M. Aschermann, A. Linhart, O. Kittnar,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 1997-04-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 1997
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 1998
Free Medical Journals
from 1997
PubMed Central
from 1997
Europe PubMed Central
from 1997
Open Access Digital Library
from 1997-08-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 1997-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 1998-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2011-02-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1997
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 1997-04-01
PubMed
22424292
DOI
10.1186/cc11254
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Analysis of Variance MeSH
- Carotid Arteries physiology MeSH
- Hemodynamics MeSH
- Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping * MeSH
- Coronary Vessels physiology MeSH
- Coronary Circulation physiology MeSH
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation methods MeSH
- Disease Models, Animal MeSH
- Random Allocation MeSH
- Swine MeSH
- Blood Flow Velocity physiology MeSH
- Heart Arrest physiopathology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in cardiac arrest (CA). Adequacy of carotid and coronary blood flows (CaBF, CoBF) and coronary perfusion pressure (CoPP) in ECMO treated CA is not well established. This study compares femoro-femoral (FF) to femoro-subclavian (FS) ECMO and intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) contribution based on CaBF, CoBF, CoPP, myocardial and brain oxygenation in experimental CA managed by ECMO. METHODS: In 11 female pigs (50.3 ± 3.4 kg), CA was randomly treated by FF versus FS ECMO ± IABP. Animals under general anesthesia had undergone 15 minutes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) with ECMO flow of 5 to 10 mL/kg/min simulating low-flow CA followed by continued VF with ECMO flow of 100 mL/kg/min. CaBF and CoBF were measured by a Doppler flow wire, cerebral and peripheral oxygenation by near infrared spectroscopy. CoPP, myocardial oxygen metabolism and resuscitability were determined. RESULTS: CaBF reached values > 80% of baseline in all regimens. CoBF > 80% was reached only by the FF ECMO, 90.0% (66.1, 98.6). Addition of IABP to FF ECMO decreased CoBF to 60.7% (55.1, 86.2) of baseline, P = 0.004. FS ECMO produced 70.0% (49.1, 113.2) of baseline CoBF, significantly lower than FF, P = 0.039. Addition of IABP to FS did not change the CoBF; however, it provided significantly higher flow, 76.7% (71.9, 111.2) of baseline, compared to FF + IABP, P = 0.026. Both brain and peripheral regional oxygen saturations decreased after induction of CA to 23% (15.0, 32.3) and 34% (23.5, 34.0), respectively, and normalized after ECMO institution. For brain saturations, all regimens reached values exceeding 80% of baseline, none of the comparisons between respective treatment approaches differed significantly. After a decline to 15 mmHg (9.5, 20.8) during CA, CoPP gradually rose with time to 68 mmHg (43.3, 84.0), P = 0 .003, with best recovery on FF ECMO. Resuscitability of the animals was high, both 5 and 60 minutes return of spontaneous circulation occured in eight animals (73%). CONCLUSIONS: In a pig model of CA, both FF and FS ECMO assure adequate brain perfusion and oxygenation. FF ECMO offers better CoBF than FS ECMO. Addition of IABP to FF ECMO worsens CoBF. FF ECMO, more than FS ECMO, increases CoPP over time.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16021121
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160725121253.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160722s2012 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/cc11254 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/cc11254 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22424292
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Bělohlávek, Jan $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic. jan.belohlavek@vfn.cz
- 245 10
- $a Coronary versus carotid blood flow and coronary perfusion pressure in a pig model of prolonged cardiac arrest treated by different modes of venoarterial ECMO and intraaortic balloon counterpulsation / $c J. Bělohlávek, M. Mlček, M. Huptych, T. Svoboda, S. Havránek, P. Ošt'ádal, T. Bouček, T. Kovárník, F. Mlejnský, V. Mrázek, M. Bělohlávek, M. Aschermann, A. Linhart, O. Kittnar,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in cardiac arrest (CA). Adequacy of carotid and coronary blood flows (CaBF, CoBF) and coronary perfusion pressure (CoPP) in ECMO treated CA is not well established. This study compares femoro-femoral (FF) to femoro-subclavian (FS) ECMO and intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) contribution based on CaBF, CoBF, CoPP, myocardial and brain oxygenation in experimental CA managed by ECMO. METHODS: In 11 female pigs (50.3 ± 3.4 kg), CA was randomly treated by FF versus FS ECMO ± IABP. Animals under general anesthesia had undergone 15 minutes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) with ECMO flow of 5 to 10 mL/kg/min simulating low-flow CA followed by continued VF with ECMO flow of 100 mL/kg/min. CaBF and CoBF were measured by a Doppler flow wire, cerebral and peripheral oxygenation by near infrared spectroscopy. CoPP, myocardial oxygen metabolism and resuscitability were determined. RESULTS: CaBF reached values > 80% of baseline in all regimens. CoBF > 80% was reached only by the FF ECMO, 90.0% (66.1, 98.6). Addition of IABP to FF ECMO decreased CoBF to 60.7% (55.1, 86.2) of baseline, P = 0.004. FS ECMO produced 70.0% (49.1, 113.2) of baseline CoBF, significantly lower than FF, P = 0.039. Addition of IABP to FS did not change the CoBF; however, it provided significantly higher flow, 76.7% (71.9, 111.2) of baseline, compared to FF + IABP, P = 0.026. Both brain and peripheral regional oxygen saturations decreased after induction of CA to 23% (15.0, 32.3) and 34% (23.5, 34.0), respectively, and normalized after ECMO institution. For brain saturations, all regimens reached values exceeding 80% of baseline, none of the comparisons between respective treatment approaches differed significantly. After a decline to 15 mmHg (9.5, 20.8) during CA, CoPP gradually rose with time to 68 mmHg (43.3, 84.0), P = 0 .003, with best recovery on FF ECMO. Resuscitability of the animals was high, both 5 and 60 minutes return of spontaneous circulation occured in eight animals (73%). CONCLUSIONS: In a pig model of CA, both FF and FS ECMO assure adequate brain perfusion and oxygenation. FF ECMO offers better CoBF than FS ECMO. Addition of IABP to FF ECMO worsens CoBF. FF ECMO, more than FS ECMO, increases CoPP over time.
- 650 _2
- $a analýza rozptylu $7 D000704
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a rychlost toku krve $x fyziologie $7 D001783
- 650 _2
- $a arteriae carotides $x fyziologie $7 D002339
- 650 _2
- $a koronární cirkulace $x fyziologie $7 D003326
- 650 _2
- $a koronární cévy $x fyziologie $7 D003331
- 650 _2
- $a modely nemocí na zvířatech $7 D004195
- 650 _2
- $a mimotělní membránová oxygenace $x metody $7 D015199
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a srdeční zástava $x patofyziologie $7 D006323
- 650 _2
- $a hemodynamika $7 D006439
- 650 12
- $a intraaortální balónková pumpa $7 D007423
- 650 _2
- $a náhodné rozdělení $7 D011897
- 650 _2
- $a prasata $7 D013552
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Mlček, Mikuláš
- 700 1_
- $a Huptych, Michal
- 700 1_
- $a Svoboda, Tomáš
- 700 1_
- $a Havránek, Stěpán
- 700 1_
- $a Ošt'ádal, Petr
- 700 1_
- $a Bouček, Tomáš
- 700 1_
- $a Kovárník, Tomáš
- 700 1_
- $a Mlejnský, František
- 700 1_
- $a Mrázek, Vratislav
- 700 1_
- $a Bělohlávek, Marek
- 700 1_
- $a Aschermann, Michael $7 nlk19990072993
- 700 1_
- $a Linhart, Aleš
- 700 1_
- $a Kittnar, Otomar
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006603 $t Critical care (London, England) $x 1466-609X $g Roč. 16, č. 2 (2012), s. R50
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22424292 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160722 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160725121512 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1155791 $s 945649
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 16 $c 2 $d R50 $e 20121212 $i 1466-609X $m Critical care $n Crit Care $x MED00006603
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160722