-
Something wrong with this record ?
The perceptions of public health nurses on using standardized care plans to translate evidence-based guidelines into family home visiting practice
Karen A. Monsen, Sadie M. Swenson, Madeleine J. Kerr
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2014
ProQuest Central
from 2005-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2005-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2005
- MeSH
- Qualitative Research MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Evidence-Based Nursing * MeSH
- Home Health Aides MeSH
- Patient Care Planning MeSH
- Home Care Services * MeSH
- Guidelines as Topic * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Objectives: Public health nurse (PHN) perceptions of using standardized care plans to translate evidence-based guidelines into family home visiting practice have not been examined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate PHN experience and awareness of cognitive processes while using evidence-based care plans in family home visiting practice. Design: This qualitative study used content analysis of PHN interviews. Sample: A purposive sample of PHNs in a local public health agency who were experienced in the use of care plans in electronic documentation. Measures: The qualitative study utilized content analysis methods. Semi-structured interviews examined their cognitive experience transitioning from usual practice care plans to evidence-based care plans. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Themes were developed and revised following several reviews of the transcripts. Results: Four themes from PHN interviews revealed a complex dynamic process of knowledge management: 1. PHN thinking is separate from the care plan. 2. PHN thinking is supported by the care plan. 3. PHN thinking is stimulated by the care plan. 4. PHN documentation distress is minimized when the care plan matches PHN thinking. Conclusion: While using the evidence-based FHV care plan, PHN cognitive processes were related to their own knowledge and expertise, their individual clients, and the entire client population or program. Evidence-based care plans supported and stimulated PHN thinking about evidence-based interventions and their application in practice. A good fit of the care plan knowledge schemata with a PHN’s own knowledge schemata may decrease documentation distress. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of using evidence-based care plans in other disciplines and settings.
References provided by Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16026251
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20161209163414.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160921s2016 xr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.kontakt.2016.04.001 $2 doi
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Monsen, Karen A. $u University of Minnesota, School of Nursing, Minnesota, USA
- 245 14
- $a The perceptions of public health nurses on using standardized care plans to translate evidence-based guidelines into family home visiting practice / $c Karen A. Monsen, Sadie M. Swenson, Madeleine J. Kerr
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 3_
- $a Objectives: Public health nurse (PHN) perceptions of using standardized care plans to translate evidence-based guidelines into family home visiting practice have not been examined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate PHN experience and awareness of cognitive processes while using evidence-based care plans in family home visiting practice. Design: This qualitative study used content analysis of PHN interviews. Sample: A purposive sample of PHNs in a local public health agency who were experienced in the use of care plans in electronic documentation. Measures: The qualitative study utilized content analysis methods. Semi-structured interviews examined their cognitive experience transitioning from usual practice care plans to evidence-based care plans. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Themes were developed and revised following several reviews of the transcripts. Results: Four themes from PHN interviews revealed a complex dynamic process of knowledge management: 1. PHN thinking is separate from the care plan. 2. PHN thinking is supported by the care plan. 3. PHN thinking is stimulated by the care plan. 4. PHN documentation distress is minimized when the care plan matches PHN thinking. Conclusion: While using the evidence-based FHV care plan, PHN cognitive processes were related to their own knowledge and expertise, their individual clients, and the entire client population or program. Evidence-based care plans supported and stimulated PHN thinking about evidence-based interventions and their application in practice. A good fit of the care plan knowledge schemata with a PHN’s own knowledge schemata may decrease documentation distress. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of using evidence-based care plans in other disciplines and settings.
- 650 12
- $a ošetřovatelství založené na důkazech $7 D055318
- 650 12
- $a směrnice jako téma $7 D017408
- 650 12
- $a služby domácí péče $7 D006699
- 650 _2
- $a pečovatelky $7 D018576
- 650 _2
- $a kvalitativní výzkum $7 D036301
- 650 _2
- $a plánování péče o pacienty $7 D010347
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Swenson, Sadie M. $u University of Minnesota, School of Nursing, Minnesota, USA; Olmsted County Minnesota, Department of Public Health, Minnesota, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Kerr, Madeleine J. $u University of Minnesota, School of Nursing, Minnesota, USA
- 773 0_
- $t Kontakt $x 1212-4117 $g Roč. 18, č. 2 (2016), s. 85-96 $w MED00011467
- 856 41
- $u https://kont.zsf.jcu.cz/pdfs/knt/2016/02/05.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 2178 $c 1249 a $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160921133704 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20161209163421 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1163744 $s 950860
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 18 $c 2 $d 85-96 $i 1212-4117 $m Kontakt (České Budějovice) $n Kontakt (Čes. Budějovice Print) $x MED00011467
- LZP __
- $c NLK121 $d 20161209 $a NLK 2016-34/pk