• Something wrong with this record ?

Functional diversity through the mean trait dissimilarity: resolving shortcomings with existing paradigms and algorithms

F. de Bello, CP. Carmona, J. Lepš, R. Szava-Kovats, M. Pärtel,

. 2016 ; 180 (4) : 933-40. [pub] 20160121

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2003-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2003-01-01 to 1 year ago

While an increasing number of indices for estimating the functional trait diversity of biological communities are being proposed, there is a growing demand by ecologists to clarify their actual implications and simplify index selection. Several key indices relate to mean trait dissimilarity between species within biological communities. Among them, the most widely used include (a) the mean species pairwise dissimilarity (MPD) and (b) the Rao quadratic entropy (and related indices). These indices are often regarded as redundant and promote the unsubstantiated yet widely held view that Rao is a form of MPD. Worryingly, existing R functions also do not always simplify the use and differentiation of these indices. In this paper, we show various distinctions between these two indices that warrant mathematical and biological consideration. We start by showing an existing form of MPD that considers species abundances and is different from Rao both mathematically and conceptually. We then show that the mathematical relationship between MPD and Rao can be presented simply as Rao = MPD × Simpson, where the Simpson diversity index is defined as 1 - dominance. We further show that this relationship is maintained for both species abundances and presence/absence. This evidence dismantles the paradigm that the Rao diversity is an abundance-weighted form of MPD and indicates that both indices can differ substantially at low species diversities. We discuss the different interpretations of trait diversity patterns in biological communities provided by Rao and MPD and then provide a simple R function, called "melodic," which avoids the unintended results that arise from existing mainstream functions.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16027729
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20161027114603.0
007      
ta
008      
161005s2016 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00442-016-3546-0 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00442-016-3546-0 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26796409
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a de Bello, Francesco $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. fradebello@ctfc.es. Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, 379 82, Třeboň, Czech Republic. fradebello@ctfc.es.
245    10
$a Functional diversity through the mean trait dissimilarity: resolving shortcomings with existing paradigms and algorithms / $c F. de Bello, CP. Carmona, J. Lepš, R. Szava-Kovats, M. Pärtel,
520    9_
$a While an increasing number of indices for estimating the functional trait diversity of biological communities are being proposed, there is a growing demand by ecologists to clarify their actual implications and simplify index selection. Several key indices relate to mean trait dissimilarity between species within biological communities. Among them, the most widely used include (a) the mean species pairwise dissimilarity (MPD) and (b) the Rao quadratic entropy (and related indices). These indices are often regarded as redundant and promote the unsubstantiated yet widely held view that Rao is a form of MPD. Worryingly, existing R functions also do not always simplify the use and differentiation of these indices. In this paper, we show various distinctions between these two indices that warrant mathematical and biological consideration. We start by showing an existing form of MPD that considers species abundances and is different from Rao both mathematically and conceptually. We then show that the mathematical relationship between MPD and Rao can be presented simply as Rao = MPD × Simpson, where the Simpson diversity index is defined as 1 - dominance. We further show that this relationship is maintained for both species abundances and presence/absence. This evidence dismantles the paradigm that the Rao diversity is an abundance-weighted form of MPD and indicates that both indices can differ substantially at low species diversities. We discuss the different interpretations of trait diversity patterns in biological communities provided by Rao and MPD and then provide a simple R function, called "melodic," which avoids the unintended results that arise from existing mainstream functions.
650    12
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    12
$a biodiverzita $7 D044822
650    _2
$a ekologie $x normy $7 D004463
650    _2
$a biologické modely $7 D008954
650    12
$a fenotyp $7 D010641
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Carmona, Carlos P $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. Terrestrial Ecology Group, Department of Ecology, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a Lepš, Jan $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre of Czech Academy of Science, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Szava-Kovats, Robert $u Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
700    1_
$a Pärtel, Meelis $u Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
773    0_
$w MED00005783 $t Oecologia $x 1432-1939 $g Roč. 180, č. 4 (2016), s. 933-40
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26796409 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20161005 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20161027115020 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1166043 $s 952359
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 180 $c 4 $d 933-40 $e 20160121 $i 1432-1939 $m Oecologia $n Oecologia $x MED00005783
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20161005

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...