-
Something wrong with this record ?
Functional diversity through the mean trait dissimilarity: resolving shortcomings with existing paradigms and algorithms
F. de Bello, CP. Carmona, J. Lepš, R. Szava-Kovats, M. Pärtel,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2003-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2003-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Algorithms * MeSH
- Biodiversity * MeSH
- Models, Biological MeSH
- Ecology standards MeSH
- Phenotype * MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
While an increasing number of indices for estimating the functional trait diversity of biological communities are being proposed, there is a growing demand by ecologists to clarify their actual implications and simplify index selection. Several key indices relate to mean trait dissimilarity between species within biological communities. Among them, the most widely used include (a) the mean species pairwise dissimilarity (MPD) and (b) the Rao quadratic entropy (and related indices). These indices are often regarded as redundant and promote the unsubstantiated yet widely held view that Rao is a form of MPD. Worryingly, existing R functions also do not always simplify the use and differentiation of these indices. In this paper, we show various distinctions between these two indices that warrant mathematical and biological consideration. We start by showing an existing form of MPD that considers species abundances and is different from Rao both mathematically and conceptually. We then show that the mathematical relationship between MPD and Rao can be presented simply as Rao = MPD × Simpson, where the Simpson diversity index is defined as 1 - dominance. We further show that this relationship is maintained for both species abundances and presence/absence. This evidence dismantles the paradigm that the Rao diversity is an abundance-weighted form of MPD and indicates that both indices can differ substantially at low species diversities. We discuss the different interpretations of trait diversity patterns in biological communities provided by Rao and MPD and then provide a simple R function, called "melodic," which avoids the unintended results that arise from existing mainstream functions.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16027729
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20161027114603.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 161005s2016 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00442-016-3546-0 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00442-016-3546-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26796409
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a de Bello, Francesco $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. fradebello@ctfc.es. Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, 379 82, Třeboň, Czech Republic. fradebello@ctfc.es.
- 245 10
- $a Functional diversity through the mean trait dissimilarity: resolving shortcomings with existing paradigms and algorithms / $c F. de Bello, CP. Carmona, J. Lepš, R. Szava-Kovats, M. Pärtel,
- 520 9_
- $a While an increasing number of indices for estimating the functional trait diversity of biological communities are being proposed, there is a growing demand by ecologists to clarify their actual implications and simplify index selection. Several key indices relate to mean trait dissimilarity between species within biological communities. Among them, the most widely used include (a) the mean species pairwise dissimilarity (MPD) and (b) the Rao quadratic entropy (and related indices). These indices are often regarded as redundant and promote the unsubstantiated yet widely held view that Rao is a form of MPD. Worryingly, existing R functions also do not always simplify the use and differentiation of these indices. In this paper, we show various distinctions between these two indices that warrant mathematical and biological consideration. We start by showing an existing form of MPD that considers species abundances and is different from Rao both mathematically and conceptually. We then show that the mathematical relationship between MPD and Rao can be presented simply as Rao = MPD × Simpson, where the Simpson diversity index is defined as 1 - dominance. We further show that this relationship is maintained for both species abundances and presence/absence. This evidence dismantles the paradigm that the Rao diversity is an abundance-weighted form of MPD and indicates that both indices can differ substantially at low species diversities. We discuss the different interpretations of trait diversity patterns in biological communities provided by Rao and MPD and then provide a simple R function, called "melodic," which avoids the unintended results that arise from existing mainstream functions.
- 650 12
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 12
- $a biodiverzita $7 D044822
- 650 _2
- $a ekologie $x normy $7 D004463
- 650 _2
- $a biologické modely $7 D008954
- 650 12
- $a fenotyp $7 D010641
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Carmona, Carlos P $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. Terrestrial Ecology Group, Department of Ecology, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Lepš, Jan $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre of Czech Academy of Science, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Szava-Kovats, Robert $u Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
- 700 1_
- $a Pärtel, Meelis $u Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005783 $t Oecologia $x 1432-1939 $g Roč. 180, č. 4 (2016), s. 933-40
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26796409 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20161005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20161027115020 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1166043 $s 952359
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 180 $c 4 $d 933-40 $e 20160121 $i 1432-1939 $m Oecologia $n Oecologia $x MED00005783
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20161005