• Something wrong with this record ?

The Transcriptomic Response of Arabidopsis thaliana to Zinc Oxide: A Comparison of the Impact of Nanoparticle, Bulk, and Ionic Zinc

P. Landa, S. Prerostova, S. Petrova, V. Knirsch, R. Vankova, T. Vanek,

. 2015 ; 49 (24) : 14537-45. [pub] 20151124

Language English Country United States

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The impact of nanosize was evaluated by comparing of the transcriptomic response of Arabidopsis thaliana roots to ZnO nanoparticles (nZnO), bulk ZnO, and ionic Zn(2+). Microarray analyses revealed 416 up- and 961 down-regulated transcripts (expression difference >2-fold, p [FDR] < 0.01) after a seven-day treatment with nZnO (average particle size 20 nm, concentration 4 mg L(-1)). Exposure to bulk ZnO resulted in 816 up- and 2179 down-regulated transcripts. The most dramatic changes (1711 transcripts up- and 3242 down-regulated) were caused by the presence of ionic Zn(2+) (applied as ZnSO4.7H20 at a concentration of 14.14 mg L(-1), corresponding to the amount of Zn contained in 4 mg L(-1) ZnO). Genes involved in stress response (e.g., to salt, osmotic stress or water deprivation) were the most relatively abundant group of gene transcripts up-regulated by all three Zn treatments while genes involved in cell organization and biogenesis (e.g., tubulins, arabinogalactan proteins) and DNA or RNA metabolism (e.g., histones) were the most relatively abundant groups of down-regulated transcripts. The similarity of the transcription profiles and the increasing number of changed transcripts correlating with the increased concentration of Zn(2+) in cultivation medium indicated that released Zn(2+) may substantially contribute to the toxic effect of nZnO because particle size has not demonstrated a decisive role.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16027968
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20161021130109.0
007      
ta
008      
161005s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1021/acs.est.5b03330 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1021/acs.est.5b03330 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26560974
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Landa, Premysl $u Laboratory of Plant Biotechnologies, Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR, v.v.i. , Rozvojova 263, 165 02 Prague 6 - Lysolaje, Czech Republic.
245    14
$a The Transcriptomic Response of Arabidopsis thaliana to Zinc Oxide: A Comparison of the Impact of Nanoparticle, Bulk, and Ionic Zinc / $c P. Landa, S. Prerostova, S. Petrova, V. Knirsch, R. Vankova, T. Vanek,
520    9_
$a The impact of nanosize was evaluated by comparing of the transcriptomic response of Arabidopsis thaliana roots to ZnO nanoparticles (nZnO), bulk ZnO, and ionic Zn(2+). Microarray analyses revealed 416 up- and 961 down-regulated transcripts (expression difference >2-fold, p [FDR] < 0.01) after a seven-day treatment with nZnO (average particle size 20 nm, concentration 4 mg L(-1)). Exposure to bulk ZnO resulted in 816 up- and 2179 down-regulated transcripts. The most dramatic changes (1711 transcripts up- and 3242 down-regulated) were caused by the presence of ionic Zn(2+) (applied as ZnSO4.7H20 at a concentration of 14.14 mg L(-1), corresponding to the amount of Zn contained in 4 mg L(-1) ZnO). Genes involved in stress response (e.g., to salt, osmotic stress or water deprivation) were the most relatively abundant group of gene transcripts up-regulated by all three Zn treatments while genes involved in cell organization and biogenesis (e.g., tubulins, arabinogalactan proteins) and DNA or RNA metabolism (e.g., histones) were the most relatively abundant groups of down-regulated transcripts. The similarity of the transcription profiles and the increasing number of changed transcripts correlating with the increased concentration of Zn(2+) in cultivation medium indicated that released Zn(2+) may substantially contribute to the toxic effect of nZnO because particle size has not demonstrated a decisive role.
650    _2
$a Arabidopsis $x účinky léků $x genetika $7 D017360
650    _2
$a kationty dvojmocné $7 D002413
650    _2
$a stanovení celkové genové exprese $x metody $7 D020869
650    _2
$a nanočástice $x chemie $x toxicita $7 D053758
650    _2
$a velikost částic $7 D010316
650    _2
$a kořeny rostlin $x účinky léků $x genetika $7 D018517
650    _2
$a testy toxicity $7 D018675
650    _2
$a oxid zinečnatý $x chemie $x farmakologie $x toxicita $7 D015034
650    _2
$a síran zinečnatý $x chemie $x toxicita $7 D019287
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Prerostova, Sylva $u Laboratory of Hormonal Regulations in Plants, Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR, v.v.i. , Rozvojova 263, 165 02 Prague 6 - Lysolaje, Czech Republic. Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague , Vinicna 5, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Petrova, Sarka $u Laboratory of Plant Biotechnologies, Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR, v.v.i. , Rozvojova 263, 165 02 Prague 6 - Lysolaje, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Knirsch, Vojtech $u Laboratory of Hormonal Regulations in Plants, Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR, v.v.i. , Rozvojova 263, 165 02 Prague 6 - Lysolaje, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vankova, Radomira $u Laboratory of Hormonal Regulations in Plants, Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR, v.v.i. , Rozvojova 263, 165 02 Prague 6 - Lysolaje, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vanek, Tomas $u Laboratory of Plant Biotechnologies, Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR, v.v.i. , Rozvojova 263, 165 02 Prague 6 - Lysolaje, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001559 $t Environmental science & technology $x 1520-5851 $g Roč. 49, č. 24 (2015), s. 14537-45
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26560974 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20161005 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20161021130517 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1166282 $s 952598
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 49 $c 24 $d 14537-45 $e 20151124 $i 1520-5851 $m Environmental science & technology $n Environ Sci Technol $x MED00001559
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20161005

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...