-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Sex differences in parental care: Gametic investment, sexual selection, and social environment
A. Liker, RP. Freckleton, V. Remeš, T. Székely,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
26420758
DOI
10.1111/evo.12786
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biologické modely MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- hnízdění * MeSH
- pohlavní dimorfismus * MeSH
- poměr pohlaví MeSH
- ptáci genetika fyziologie MeSH
- sexuální chování zvířat MeSH
- sociální prostředí MeSH
- zárodečné buňky fyziologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Male and female parents often provide different type and amount of care to their offspring. Three major drivers have been proposed to explain parental sex roles: (1) differential gametic investment by males and females that precipitates into sex difference in care, (2) different intensity of sexual selection acting on males and females, and (3) biased social environment that facilitates the more common sex to provide more care. Here, we provide the most comprehensive assessment of these hypotheses using detailed parental care data from 792 bird species covering 126 families. We found no evidence for the gametic investment hypothesis: neither gamete sizes nor gamete production by males relative to females was related to sex difference in parental care. However, sexual selection correlated with parental sex roles, because the male share in care relative to female decreased with both extra-pair paternity and frequency of male polygamy. Parental sex roles were also related to social environment, because male parental care increased with male-biased adult sex ratios (ASRs). Taken together, our results are consistent with recent theories suggesting that gametic investment is not tied to parental sex roles, and highlight the importance of both sexual selection and ASR in influencing parental sex roles.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16028164
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20161021121427.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 161005s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/evo.12786 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/evo.12786 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26420758
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Liker, András $u Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom. aliker@almos.uni-pannon.hu. Department of Limnology, University of Pannonia, PO Box 158, 8201, Veszprém, Hungary. aliker@almos.uni-pannon.hu.
- 245 10
- $a Sex differences in parental care: Gametic investment, sexual selection, and social environment / $c A. Liker, RP. Freckleton, V. Remeš, T. Székely,
- 520 9_
- $a Male and female parents often provide different type and amount of care to their offspring. Three major drivers have been proposed to explain parental sex roles: (1) differential gametic investment by males and females that precipitates into sex difference in care, (2) different intensity of sexual selection acting on males and females, and (3) biased social environment that facilitates the more common sex to provide more care. Here, we provide the most comprehensive assessment of these hypotheses using detailed parental care data from 792 bird species covering 126 families. We found no evidence for the gametic investment hypothesis: neither gamete sizes nor gamete production by males relative to females was related to sex difference in parental care. However, sexual selection correlated with parental sex roles, because the male share in care relative to female decreased with both extra-pair paternity and frequency of male polygamy. Parental sex roles were also related to social environment, because male parental care increased with male-biased adult sex ratios (ASRs). Taken together, our results are consistent with recent theories suggesting that gametic investment is not tied to parental sex roles, and highlight the importance of both sexual selection and ASR in influencing parental sex roles.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a ptáci $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D001717
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a zárodečné buňky $x fyziologie $7 D005854
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a biologické modely $7 D008954
- 650 12
- $a hnízdění $7 D009425
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 12
- $a pohlavní dimorfismus $7 D012727
- 650 _2
- $a poměr pohlaví $7 D012744
- 650 _2
- $a sexuální chování zvířat $7 D012726
- 650 _2
- $a sociální prostředí $7 D012931
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Freckleton, Robert P $u Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom.
- 700 1_
- $a Remeš, Vladimir $u Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 50, 77146, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Székely, Tamás $u Biodiversity Laboratory, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom. State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, College of Ecology and Evolution, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 5102275, China.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001672 $t Evolution; international journal of organic evolution $x 1558-5646 $g Roč. 69, č. 11 (2015), s. 2862-75
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26420758 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20161005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20161021121835 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1166478 $s 952794
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 69 $c 11 $d 2862-75 $e 20151013 $i 1558-5646 $m Evolution $n Evolution $x MED00001672
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20161005