Detail
Article
Web resource
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Nursing workload and staff allocation in an Italian hospital: a quality improvement initiative based on nursing care score

Santa Giammona, Giuseppe Arena, Michelangelo Calò, Maria Angela Barone, Davide Scelsa, Andrea Lepre, Maria Rosaria Tarantino, Elizabeth A. Schlenk

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Evaluation Study

Aim: To develop, implement, and evaluate a Nursing Care Score (NCS) system, built into the electronic health record, to optimize nursing workload and staff allocation. Design: A quality improvement (QI) initiative with a pre- and postimplementation design was conducted by an interprofessional team in the 33-bed cardio-thoracic unit of a 72-bed hospital in Palermo, Italy. Methods: A seven-phase process was used to develop, implement, and evaluate the NCS, which lists 53 nursing work tasks, each assigned a score from 1.5 to 5.0. The nurse-to-patient ratio on all shifts was determined by the NCS. Nurse satisfaction with both the existing system and the NCS workload system was assessed. Descriptive statistics and McNemar’s test were used to analyze the data. Results: At pre-implementation, 92.5% of nurses reported that the existing system was not effective, 87.5% reported it did not enable them to provide adequate nursing care, and 20.0% believed that workload was fairly distributed. At post-implementation, 75.0% of nurses reported that the NCS system was effective (p = 0.0348), 85.0% reported that the NCS system enabled them to provide adequate care, and 85.0% believed that workload was fairly distributed. An NCS score of 65 ± 5 was found to distribute workload most fairly. Conclusion: An automatic electronic operating system to generate a daily workload report based on the NCS was successfully implemented and evaluated. The NCS provided relevant information to guide nurse managers in defining nurse-to-patient ratio and determining staff allocation. Nurses were satisfied with the NCS system. The steps used to develop, implement, and evaluate the NCS system may be transferable to other units and other hospitals.

References provided by Crossref.org

Bibliography, etc.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16029467
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180716091614.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
161015s2016 xr fs 000 0|eng||
009      
eAR
024    7_
$a 10.15452/CEJNM.2016.07.0010 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Giammona, Santa $u Department of Nursing Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
245    10
$a Nursing workload and staff allocation in an Italian hospital: a quality improvement initiative based on nursing care score / $c Santa Giammona, Giuseppe Arena, Michelangelo Calò, Maria Angela Barone, Davide Scelsa, Andrea Lepre, Maria Rosaria Tarantino, Elizabeth A. Schlenk
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a Aim: To develop, implement, and evaluate a Nursing Care Score (NCS) system, built into the electronic health record, to optimize nursing workload and staff allocation. Design: A quality improvement (QI) initiative with a pre- and postimplementation design was conducted by an interprofessional team in the 33-bed cardio-thoracic unit of a 72-bed hospital in Palermo, Italy. Methods: A seven-phase process was used to develop, implement, and evaluate the NCS, which lists 53 nursing work tasks, each assigned a score from 1.5 to 5.0. The nurse-to-patient ratio on all shifts was determined by the NCS. Nurse satisfaction with both the existing system and the NCS workload system was assessed. Descriptive statistics and McNemar’s test were used to analyze the data. Results: At pre-implementation, 92.5% of nurses reported that the existing system was not effective, 87.5% reported it did not enable them to provide adequate nursing care, and 20.0% believed that workload was fairly distributed. At post-implementation, 75.0% of nurses reported that the NCS system was effective (p = 0.0348), 85.0% reported that the NCS system enabled them to provide adequate care, and 85.0% believed that workload was fairly distributed. An NCS score of 65 ± 5 was found to distribute workload most fairly. Conclusion: An automatic electronic operating system to generate a daily workload report based on the NCS was successfully implemented and evaluated. The NCS provided relevant information to guide nurse managers in defining nurse-to-patient ratio and determining staff allocation. Nurses were satisfied with the NCS system. The steps used to develop, implement, and evaluate the NCS system may be transferable to other units and other hospitals.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a pracovní zátěž $7 D016526
650    _2
$a řízení ošetřovatelství - výzkum $7 D015401
650    _2
$a ošetřovatelská péče $x organizace a řízení $x pracovní síly $7 D009732
650    12
$a personální obsazení a rozvrh - informační systémy $7 D010562
650    12
$a personál sesterský nemocniční $x organizace a řízení $7 D009741
650    _2
$a elektronické zdravotní záznamy $x využití $7 D057286
650    _2
$a zdravotní sestry $x organizace a řízení $7 D009726
651    _2
$a Itálie $7 D007558
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
700    1_
$a Arena, Giuseppe $u Department of Nursing Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy $7 gn_A_00008220
700    1_
$a Calò, Michelangelo $u Department of Nursing Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
700    1_
$a Barone, Maria Angela $u Quality Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
700    1_
$a Scelsa, Davide $u Department of MD Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
700    1_
$a Lepre, Andrea $u Department of Nursing Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
700    1_
$a Tarantino, Maria Rosaria $u Department of Nursing Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
700    1_
$a Schlenk, Elizabeth A. $u School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
773    0_
$t Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery $x 2336-3517 $g Roč. 7, č. 2 (2016), s. 420-427 $w MED00183333
856    41
$u http://periodika.osu.cz/cejnm/dok/2016-02/10-giammona-et-al.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20161015062302 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180716091912 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1168307 $s 954104
BAS    __
$a 3 $a 4
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 7 $c 2 $d 420-427 $i 2336-3517 $m Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery $x MED00183333
LZP    __
$c NLK188 $d 20170227 $a NLK 2016-36/vt

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...