-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Aloplastické materiály z pohledu jejich citlivosti ke kolonizaci bakteriemi [Alloplastic materials and their propensity to bacterial colonisation]
R. Ballay, I. Landor, F. Růžička, P. Melicherčík, J. Tomaides, D. Jahoda
Jazyk čeština Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
27484073
DOI
10.55095/achot2016/024
- MeSH
- artroplastiky kloubů přístrojové vybavení MeSH
- biofilmy růst a vývoj MeSH
- biokompatibilní materiály škodlivé účinky chemie MeSH
- Enterococcus faecalis fyziologie MeSH
- Escherichia coli fyziologie MeSH
- infekce spojené s protézou mikrobiologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- povrchové vlastnosti MeSH
- protézy a implantáty škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa fyziologie MeSH
- Staphylococcus aureus fyziologie MeSH
- Staphylococcus epidermidis fyziologie MeSH
- testování materiálů MeSH
- titan chemie MeSH
- vitalium chemie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
UNLABELLED: PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The alloplastic materials currently used for protective surface layers on implants were tested in vitro under microbiological laboratory conditions by contamination with microbial agents most frequently found in deep infection of total joint replacements. The objective was to find out how the resistance to bacterial colonisation was related to different surface finishes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Each of 14 samples of alloplastic material currently used in the manufacture of orthopaedic implants was inoculated with each of the group of microorganisms most frequently infecting joint replacements; these were Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. At 24 hours of incubation, biofilms produced on sample surfaces were collected, stained with crystalline violet and assessed by spectrophotometry. The average value of biofilm absorbances (AV595) for the group of microorganism tested was taken as a basic characteristic of each material sample indicating its sensitivity to bacterial. RESULTS Of the metal materials with smooth surface finish, Vitalium (AV595, 0.368) showed the lowest affinity to microbial colonisation; next was titanium (AV595, 0.459) and steel (AV595, 0.505). A significant increase in sensitivity to bacterial colonisation was recorded in all types of surface finish of steel (AV595, 0.571) and in titanium alloy with a rough surface texture (AV595, 0.737 to 1.676); p < 0.05. Porous titanium surfaces significantly increased material affinity to colonisation. DISCUSSION Our study had certain limitations concerning in vitro evaluation of porous surfaces that have high affinity to bacterial colonisation. Porous titanium, and its hydroxyapatite layer in particular, considerably promotes osteoblast colonisation of the surface as well as implant osseointegration in the bone bed. Microorganisms therefore have no room for surface colonisation. Problematic may remain the surface parts outside contact with bone that keep their affinity to bacterial colonisation. CONCLUSIONS The material of choice for cemented implants is Vitalium which, of all metal surfaces, has the lowest sensitivity to bacterial colonisation. The materials of choice for cementless implants are titanium alloys. However, an osteoactive surface not in contact with bone remains a problem. On the one hand, its roughness and porosity are crucial to good osseointegration, on the other hand, its affinity to bacterial colonisation is high. KEY WORDS: alloplastic material, biofilm, joint replacement infection.
1 ortopedická klinika 1 lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy Praha a Fakultní nemocnice Motol Praha
Mikrobiologický ústav Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity Fakultní nemocnice u Sv Anny Brno
Alloplastic materials and their propensity to bacterial colonisation
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17010344
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250121143140.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170320s2016 xr ad f 000 0|cze||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.55095/achot2016/024 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27484073
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Ballay, Rastislav $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze a Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Praha $7 xx0327926
- 245 10
- $a Aloplastické materiály z pohledu jejich citlivosti ke kolonizaci bakteriemi / $c R. Ballay, I. Landor, F. Růžička, P. Melicherčík, J. Tomaides, D. Jahoda
- 246 31
- $a Alloplastic materials and their propensity to bacterial colonisation
- 520 9_
- $a UNLABELLED: PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The alloplastic materials currently used for protective surface layers on implants were tested in vitro under microbiological laboratory conditions by contamination with microbial agents most frequently found in deep infection of total joint replacements. The objective was to find out how the resistance to bacterial colonisation was related to different surface finishes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Each of 14 samples of alloplastic material currently used in the manufacture of orthopaedic implants was inoculated with each of the group of microorganisms most frequently infecting joint replacements; these were Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. At 24 hours of incubation, biofilms produced on sample surfaces were collected, stained with crystalline violet and assessed by spectrophotometry. The average value of biofilm absorbances (AV595) for the group of microorganism tested was taken as a basic characteristic of each material sample indicating its sensitivity to bacterial. RESULTS Of the metal materials with smooth surface finish, Vitalium (AV595, 0.368) showed the lowest affinity to microbial colonisation; next was titanium (AV595, 0.459) and steel (AV595, 0.505). A significant increase in sensitivity to bacterial colonisation was recorded in all types of surface finish of steel (AV595, 0.571) and in titanium alloy with a rough surface texture (AV595, 0.737 to 1.676); p < 0.05. Porous titanium surfaces significantly increased material affinity to colonisation. DISCUSSION Our study had certain limitations concerning in vitro evaluation of porous surfaces that have high affinity to bacterial colonisation. Porous titanium, and its hydroxyapatite layer in particular, considerably promotes osteoblast colonisation of the surface as well as implant osseointegration in the bone bed. Microorganisms therefore have no room for surface colonisation. Problematic may remain the surface parts outside contact with bone that keep their affinity to bacterial colonisation. CONCLUSIONS The material of choice for cemented implants is Vitalium which, of all metal surfaces, has the lowest sensitivity to bacterial colonisation. The materials of choice for cementless implants are titanium alloys. However, an osteoactive surface not in contact with bone remains a problem. On the one hand, its roughness and porosity are crucial to good osseointegration, on the other hand, its affinity to bacterial colonisation is high. KEY WORDS: alloplastic material, biofilm, joint replacement infection.
- 650 _2
- $a artroplastiky kloubů $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D019643
- 650 _2
- $a biokompatibilní materiály $x škodlivé účinky $x chemie $7 D001672
- 650 _2
- $a biofilmy $x růst a vývoj $7 D018441
- 650 _2
- $a Enterococcus faecalis $x fyziologie $7 D013293
- 650 _2
- $a Escherichia coli $x fyziologie $7 D004926
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a testování materiálů $7 D008422
- 650 _2
- $a protézy a implantáty $x škodlivé účinky $7 D019736
- 650 _2
- $a infekce spojené s protézou $x mikrobiologie $7 D016459
- 650 _2
- $a Pseudomonas aeruginosa $x fyziologie $7 D011550
- 650 _2
- $a Staphylococcus aureus $x fyziologie $7 D013211
- 650 _2
- $a Staphylococcus epidermidis $x fyziologie $7 D013212
- 650 _2
- $a povrchové vlastnosti $7 D013499
- 650 _2
- $a titan $x chemie $7 D014025
- 650 _2
- $a vitalium $x chemie $7 D014800
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Landor, Ivan, $d 1956- $7 xx0062301 $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze a Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Praha
- 700 1_
- $a Růžička, Filip $7 xx0071619 $u Mikrobiologický ústav Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity, Fakultní nemocnice u Sv. Anny, Brno
- 700 1_
- $a Melicherčík, Pavel $7 xx0139339 $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze a Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Praha
- 700 1_
- $a Tomaides, Jan $7 xx0110486 $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze a Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Praha
- 700 1_
- $a Jahoda, David $7 xx0014721 $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze a Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Praha
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 83, č. 3 (2016), s. 163-168
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170320 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250121143136 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1197263 $s 971060
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 83 $c 3 $d 163-168 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20170320