Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Aloplastické materiály z pohledu jejich citlivosti ke kolonizaci bakteriemi [Alloplastic materials and their propensity to bacterial colonisation]

R. Ballay, I. Landor, F. Růžička, P. Melicherčík, J. Tomaides, D. Jahoda

. 2016 ; 83 (3) : 163-168.

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17010344

Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj

E-zdroje Online

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2006

UNLABELLED: PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The alloplastic materials currently used for protective surface layers on implants were tested in vitro under microbiological laboratory conditions by contamination with microbial agents most frequently found in deep infection of total joint replacements. The objective was to find out how the resistance to bacterial colonisation was related to different surface finishes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Each of 14 samples of alloplastic material currently used in the manufacture of orthopaedic implants was inoculated with each of the group of microorganisms most frequently infecting joint replacements; these were Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. At 24 hours of incubation, biofilms produced on sample surfaces were collected, stained with crystalline violet and assessed by spectrophotometry. The average value of biofilm absorbances (AV595) for the group of microorganism tested was taken as a basic characteristic of each material sample indicating its sensitivity to bacterial. RESULTS Of the metal materials with smooth surface finish, Vitalium (AV595, 0.368) showed the lowest affinity to microbial colonisation; next was titanium (AV595, 0.459) and steel (AV595, 0.505). A significant increase in sensitivity to bacterial colonisation was recorded in all types of surface finish of steel (AV595, 0.571) and in titanium alloy with a rough surface texture (AV595, 0.737 to 1.676); p < 0.05. Porous titanium surfaces significantly increased material affinity to colonisation. DISCUSSION Our study had certain limitations concerning in vitro evaluation of porous surfaces that have high affinity to bacterial colonisation. Porous titanium, and its hydroxyapatite layer in particular, considerably promotes osteoblast colonisation of the surface as well as implant osseointegration in the bone bed. Microorganisms therefore have no room for surface colonisation. Problematic may remain the surface parts outside contact with bone that keep their affinity to bacterial colonisation. CONCLUSIONS The material of choice for cemented implants is Vitalium which, of all metal surfaces, has the lowest sensitivity to bacterial colonisation. The materials of choice for cementless implants are titanium alloys. However, an osteoactive surface not in contact with bone remains a problem. On the one hand, its roughness and porosity are crucial to good osseointegration, on the other hand, its affinity to bacterial colonisation is high. KEY WORDS: alloplastic material, biofilm, joint replacement infection.

Alloplastic materials and their propensity to bacterial colonisation

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17010344
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250121143140.0
007      
ta
008      
170320s2016 xr ad f 000 0|cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.55095/achot2016/024 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27484073
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Ballay, Rastislav $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze a Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Praha $7 xx0327926
245    10
$a Aloplastické materiály z pohledu jejich citlivosti ke kolonizaci bakteriemi / $c R. Ballay, I. Landor, F. Růžička, P. Melicherčík, J. Tomaides, D. Jahoda
246    31
$a Alloplastic materials and their propensity to bacterial colonisation
520    9_
$a UNLABELLED: PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The alloplastic materials currently used for protective surface layers on implants were tested in vitro under microbiological laboratory conditions by contamination with microbial agents most frequently found in deep infection of total joint replacements. The objective was to find out how the resistance to bacterial colonisation was related to different surface finishes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Each of 14 samples of alloplastic material currently used in the manufacture of orthopaedic implants was inoculated with each of the group of microorganisms most frequently infecting joint replacements; these were Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. At 24 hours of incubation, biofilms produced on sample surfaces were collected, stained with crystalline violet and assessed by spectrophotometry. The average value of biofilm absorbances (AV595) for the group of microorganism tested was taken as a basic characteristic of each material sample indicating its sensitivity to bacterial. RESULTS Of the metal materials with smooth surface finish, Vitalium (AV595, 0.368) showed the lowest affinity to microbial colonisation; next was titanium (AV595, 0.459) and steel (AV595, 0.505). A significant increase in sensitivity to bacterial colonisation was recorded in all types of surface finish of steel (AV595, 0.571) and in titanium alloy with a rough surface texture (AV595, 0.737 to 1.676); p < 0.05. Porous titanium surfaces significantly increased material affinity to colonisation. DISCUSSION Our study had certain limitations concerning in vitro evaluation of porous surfaces that have high affinity to bacterial colonisation. Porous titanium, and its hydroxyapatite layer in particular, considerably promotes osteoblast colonisation of the surface as well as implant osseointegration in the bone bed. Microorganisms therefore have no room for surface colonisation. Problematic may remain the surface parts outside contact with bone that keep their affinity to bacterial colonisation. CONCLUSIONS The material of choice for cemented implants is Vitalium which, of all metal surfaces, has the lowest sensitivity to bacterial colonisation. The materials of choice for cementless implants are titanium alloys. However, an osteoactive surface not in contact with bone remains a problem. On the one hand, its roughness and porosity are crucial to good osseointegration, on the other hand, its affinity to bacterial colonisation is high. KEY WORDS: alloplastic material, biofilm, joint replacement infection.
650    _2
$a artroplastiky kloubů $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D019643
650    _2
$a biokompatibilní materiály $x škodlivé účinky $x chemie $7 D001672
650    _2
$a biofilmy $x růst a vývoj $7 D018441
650    _2
$a Enterococcus faecalis $x fyziologie $7 D013293
650    _2
$a Escherichia coli $x fyziologie $7 D004926
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a testování materiálů $7 D008422
650    _2
$a protézy a implantáty $x škodlivé účinky $7 D019736
650    _2
$a infekce spojené s protézou $x mikrobiologie $7 D016459
650    _2
$a Pseudomonas aeruginosa $x fyziologie $7 D011550
650    _2
$a Staphylococcus aureus $x fyziologie $7 D013211
650    _2
$a Staphylococcus epidermidis $x fyziologie $7 D013212
650    _2
$a povrchové vlastnosti $7 D013499
650    _2
$a titan $x chemie $7 D014025
650    _2
$a vitalium $x chemie $7 D014800
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Landor, Ivan, $d 1956- $7 xx0062301 $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze a Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Praha
700    1_
$a Růžička, Filip $7 xx0071619 $u Mikrobiologický ústav Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity, Fakultní nemocnice u Sv. Anny, Brno
700    1_
$a Melicherčík, Pavel $7 xx0139339 $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze a Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Praha
700    1_
$a Tomaides, Jan $7 xx0110486 $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze a Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Praha
700    1_
$a Jahoda, David $7 xx0014721 $u I. ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze a Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Praha
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 83, č. 3 (2016), s. 163-168
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20170320 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250121143136 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1197263 $s 971060
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 83 $c 3 $d 163-168 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20170320

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...