-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Opposing effects of oxidative challenge and carotenoids on antioxidant status and condition-dependent sexual signalling
O. Tomášek, B. Gabrielová, P. Kačer, P. Maršík, J. Svobodová, K. Syslová, M. Vinkler, T. Albrecht,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
Nature Open Access
od 2011-12-01
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2011-12-01
PubMed
27000655
DOI
10.1038/srep23546
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antioxidancia metabolismus MeSH
- karotenoidy metabolismus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- oxidační stres * MeSH
- pěnkavovití fyziologie MeSH
- sexuální chování zvířat * MeSH
- signální transdukce * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Several recent hypotheses consider oxidative stress to be a primary constraint ensuring honesty of condition-dependent carotenoid-based signalling. The key testable difference between these hypotheses is the assumed importance of carotenoids for redox homeostasis, with carotenoids being either antioxidant, pro-oxidant or unimportant. We tested the role of carotenoids in redox balance and sexual signalling by exposing adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) to oxidative challenge (diquat dibromide) and manipulating carotenoid intake. As the current controversy over the importance of carotenoids as antioxidants could stem from the hydrophilic basis of commonly-used antioxidant assays, we used the novel measure of in vivo lipophilic antioxidant capacity. Oxidative challenge reduced beak pigmentation but elicited an increase in antioxidant capacity suggesting resource reallocation from signalling to redox homeostasis. Carotenoids counteracted the effect of oxidative challenge on lipophilic (but not hydrophilic) antioxidant capacity, thereby supporting carotenoid antioxidant function in vivo. This is inconsistent with hypotheses proposing that signalling honesty is maintained through either ROS-induced carotenoid degradation or the pro-oxidant effect of high levels of carotenoid-cleavage products acting as a physiological handicap. Our data further suggest that assessment of lipophilic antioxidant capacity is necessary to fully understand the role of redox processes in ecology and evolution.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17014004
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170418105843.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170413s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/srep23546 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27000655
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Tomášek, Oldřich $u Institute of Vertebrate Biology, v.v.i., The Czech Academy of Sciences, Květná 8, Brno 603 65, Czech Republic. Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, 128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Opposing effects of oxidative challenge and carotenoids on antioxidant status and condition-dependent sexual signalling / $c O. Tomášek, B. Gabrielová, P. Kačer, P. Maršík, J. Svobodová, K. Syslová, M. Vinkler, T. Albrecht,
- 520 9_
- $a Several recent hypotheses consider oxidative stress to be a primary constraint ensuring honesty of condition-dependent carotenoid-based signalling. The key testable difference between these hypotheses is the assumed importance of carotenoids for redox homeostasis, with carotenoids being either antioxidant, pro-oxidant or unimportant. We tested the role of carotenoids in redox balance and sexual signalling by exposing adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) to oxidative challenge (diquat dibromide) and manipulating carotenoid intake. As the current controversy over the importance of carotenoids as antioxidants could stem from the hydrophilic basis of commonly-used antioxidant assays, we used the novel measure of in vivo lipophilic antioxidant capacity. Oxidative challenge reduced beak pigmentation but elicited an increase in antioxidant capacity suggesting resource reallocation from signalling to redox homeostasis. Carotenoids counteracted the effect of oxidative challenge on lipophilic (but not hydrophilic) antioxidant capacity, thereby supporting carotenoid antioxidant function in vivo. This is inconsistent with hypotheses proposing that signalling honesty is maintained through either ROS-induced carotenoid degradation or the pro-oxidant effect of high levels of carotenoid-cleavage products acting as a physiological handicap. Our data further suggest that assessment of lipophilic antioxidant capacity is necessary to fully understand the role of redox processes in ecology and evolution.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a antioxidancia $x metabolismus $7 D000975
- 650 _2
- $a karotenoidy $x metabolismus $7 D002338
- 650 _2
- $a pěnkavovití $x fyziologie $7 D046369
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a oxidační stres $7 D018384
- 650 12
- $a sexuální chování zvířat $7 D012726
- 650 12
- $a signální transdukce $7 D015398
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Gabrielová, Barbora $u Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, 128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kačer, Petr $u Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Praha 6, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Maršík, Petr $u Institute of Experimental Botany, v.v.i., The Czech Academy of Sciences, Rozvojová 313, 165 02 Praha 6, Czech Republic. Department of Quality of Agricultural Products, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 1176, 165 21 Praha 6, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Svobodová, Jana $u Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 1176, 165 21 Praha 6, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Syslová, Kamila $u Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Praha 6, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vinkler, Michal $u Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, 128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Albrecht, Tomáš $u Institute of Vertebrate Biology, v.v.i., The Czech Academy of Sciences, Květná 8, Brno 603 65, Czech Republic. Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, 128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic. $7 gn_A_00003559
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 6, č. - (2016), s. 23546
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27000655 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170418110151 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1200469 $s 974782
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 6 $c - $d 23546 $e 20160322 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170413