Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer

D. Hoskovec, J. Varga, P. Dytrych, E. Konecna, J. Matek,

. 2017 ; 13 (3) : 612-616. [pub] 20161129

Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17023112

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal tumor seeding is a common form of recurrence after gastric cancer surgery. The finding of free tumor cells and/or elevation of tumor markers in the peritoneal fluid could predict intraperitoneal tumor recurrence. The results of these examination can be used for indication of aggressive treatment modalities such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have operated on 105 patients suffering from gastric cancer. The control group consisted of 12 patients without malignant disease. Peritoneal lavage fluid or ascites was collected immediately after laparotomy and examined by cytology and biochemistry (levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and Ca 19-9). Sensitivity, specificity, stage correlation and overall survival were observed. RESULTS: Elevation of tumor markers or the finding of free intraperitoneal tumor cells predicts recurrence. The prognosis of these patients is same as in stage IV TNM classification with median survival time less than 1 year (p = 0.713). Patients with negative cytology have median survival time 5 years contrary to them with positive cytology (p < 0.001). Sensitivity of the cytology was 34% and specificity was 85%. Sensitivity of biochemistry was 53% (combination of both markers) and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the importance of peritoneal fluid examination for the prognosis. We cannot recommend routine use as an indicator for HIPEC due to low sensitivity, but the result of cytological examination is an independent factor for patient survival.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17023112
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20171003103736.0
007      
ta
008      
170720s2017 pl f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5114/aoms.2016.64044 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28507577
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a pl
100    1_
$a Hoskovec, David $u 1 Department of Surgery, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer / $c D. Hoskovec, J. Varga, P. Dytrych, E. Konecna, J. Matek,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal tumor seeding is a common form of recurrence after gastric cancer surgery. The finding of free tumor cells and/or elevation of tumor markers in the peritoneal fluid could predict intraperitoneal tumor recurrence. The results of these examination can be used for indication of aggressive treatment modalities such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have operated on 105 patients suffering from gastric cancer. The control group consisted of 12 patients without malignant disease. Peritoneal lavage fluid or ascites was collected immediately after laparotomy and examined by cytology and biochemistry (levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and Ca 19-9). Sensitivity, specificity, stage correlation and overall survival were observed. RESULTS: Elevation of tumor markers or the finding of free intraperitoneal tumor cells predicts recurrence. The prognosis of these patients is same as in stage IV TNM classification with median survival time less than 1 year (p = 0.713). Patients with negative cytology have median survival time 5 years contrary to them with positive cytology (p < 0.001). Sensitivity of the cytology was 34% and specificity was 85%. Sensitivity of biochemistry was 53% (combination of both markers) and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the importance of peritoneal fluid examination for the prognosis. We cannot recommend routine use as an indicator for HIPEC due to low sensitivity, but the result of cytological examination is an independent factor for patient survival.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Varga, Jozef $u Department of Surgery, Hospital Bulovka, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Dytrych, Petr $u 1 Department of Surgery, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Konecna, Ellen $u 1 Department of Surgery, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Matek, Jan $u 1 Department of Surgery, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00172649 $t Archives of medical science AMS $x 1734-1922 $g Roč. 13, č. 3 (2017), s. 612-616
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28507577 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20171003103748 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1238793 $s 984025
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 13 $c 3 $d 612-616 $e 20161129 $i 1734-1922 $m Archives of Medical Science $n Arch Med Sci $x MED00172649
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...