-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer
D. Hoskovec, J. Varga, P. Dytrych, E. Konecna, J. Matek,
Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2005
Free Medical Journals
od 2005
PubMed Central
od 2010
Europe PubMed Central
od 2010
ProQuest Central
od 2005-01-01 do 2020-09-30
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2005-01-01 do 2020-09-30
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2005
PubMed
28507577
DOI
10.5114/aoms.2016.64044
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal tumor seeding is a common form of recurrence after gastric cancer surgery. The finding of free tumor cells and/or elevation of tumor markers in the peritoneal fluid could predict intraperitoneal tumor recurrence. The results of these examination can be used for indication of aggressive treatment modalities such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have operated on 105 patients suffering from gastric cancer. The control group consisted of 12 patients without malignant disease. Peritoneal lavage fluid or ascites was collected immediately after laparotomy and examined by cytology and biochemistry (levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and Ca 19-9). Sensitivity, specificity, stage correlation and overall survival were observed. RESULTS: Elevation of tumor markers or the finding of free intraperitoneal tumor cells predicts recurrence. The prognosis of these patients is same as in stage IV TNM classification with median survival time less than 1 year (p = 0.713). Patients with negative cytology have median survival time 5 years contrary to them with positive cytology (p < 0.001). Sensitivity of the cytology was 34% and specificity was 85%. Sensitivity of biochemistry was 53% (combination of both markers) and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the importance of peritoneal fluid examination for the prognosis. We cannot recommend routine use as an indicator for HIPEC due to low sensitivity, but the result of cytological examination is an independent factor for patient survival.
Department of Surgery General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Surgery Hospital Bulovka Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17023112
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20171003103736.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170720s2017 pl f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5114/aoms.2016.64044 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28507577
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a pl
- 100 1_
- $a Hoskovec, David $u 1 Department of Surgery, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer / $c D. Hoskovec, J. Varga, P. Dytrych, E. Konecna, J. Matek,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal tumor seeding is a common form of recurrence after gastric cancer surgery. The finding of free tumor cells and/or elevation of tumor markers in the peritoneal fluid could predict intraperitoneal tumor recurrence. The results of these examination can be used for indication of aggressive treatment modalities such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have operated on 105 patients suffering from gastric cancer. The control group consisted of 12 patients without malignant disease. Peritoneal lavage fluid or ascites was collected immediately after laparotomy and examined by cytology and biochemistry (levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and Ca 19-9). Sensitivity, specificity, stage correlation and overall survival were observed. RESULTS: Elevation of tumor markers or the finding of free intraperitoneal tumor cells predicts recurrence. The prognosis of these patients is same as in stage IV TNM classification with median survival time less than 1 year (p = 0.713). Patients with negative cytology have median survival time 5 years contrary to them with positive cytology (p < 0.001). Sensitivity of the cytology was 34% and specificity was 85%. Sensitivity of biochemistry was 53% (combination of both markers) and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the importance of peritoneal fluid examination for the prognosis. We cannot recommend routine use as an indicator for HIPEC due to low sensitivity, but the result of cytological examination is an independent factor for patient survival.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Varga, Jozef $u Department of Surgery, Hospital Bulovka, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Dytrych, Petr $u 1 Department of Surgery, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Konecna, Ellen $u 1 Department of Surgery, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Matek, Jan $u 1 Department of Surgery, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00172649 $t Archives of medical science AMS $x 1734-1922 $g Roč. 13, č. 3 (2017), s. 612-616
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28507577 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20171003103748 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1238793 $s 984025
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 13 $c 3 $d 612-616 $e 20161129 $i 1734-1922 $m Archives of Medical Science $n Arch Med Sci $x MED00172649
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170720