-
Something wrong with this record ?
The importance of electrode position in visual electrophysiology
A. Kurtenbach, S. Kramer, T. Strasser, E. Zrenner, H. Langrová,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Electrophysiology methods MeSH
- Electroretinography methods MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Microelectrodes * MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Retina physiology MeSH
- Cornea physiology MeSH
- Case-Control Studies MeSH
- Photic Stimulation methods MeSH
- Visual Acuity MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE: The DTL fibre electrode is commonly used to record the electric potentials elicited by stimulation of the retina. Two positions are commonly used: it is placed either on the cornea along the lower lid or in the conjunctival fornix. The PERG and OPs have previously been examined and compared under both conditions. The aim of this study was to examine the ERG, flicker response and on-off responses with differing electrode positions. METHODS: Before recruitment, all subjects underwent an ophthalmological examination. We enrolled 13 normal control subjects into the study aged 13-64 years, all with a visual acuity of ≥1.0. We recorded scotopic and photopic ERGs, flicker and on-off responses, for both electrode positions. On the first day, one eye had the electrode placed on the cornea along the lower lid and the other eye had it positioned in the conjunctival sac. On a second day, the recordings were repeated with the alternative electrode placements. RESULTS: ERG, on-off and flicker responses were all smaller by between 20 and 25% when the DTL electrode was positioned in the conjunctival sac, compared to when it was positioned on the cornea, as did the scatter in the data points. This indicates that there is no advantage clinically for one or the other placement. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm other reports examining the effect of electrode position on electrophysiological potentials. When recording with the DTL electrode, it is important to ensure that it is placed at the same position in repeat recordings or in multicentre trials and that it is stable and does not move during recording.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17023273
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170831111017.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170720s2017 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10633-017-9579-9 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28224239
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Kurtenbach, A $u Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Elfriede-Aulhorn Strasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. anne.kurtenbach@uni-tuebingen.de.
- 245 14
- $a The importance of electrode position in visual electrophysiology / $c A. Kurtenbach, S. Kramer, T. Strasser, E. Zrenner, H. Langrová,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: The DTL fibre electrode is commonly used to record the electric potentials elicited by stimulation of the retina. Two positions are commonly used: it is placed either on the cornea along the lower lid or in the conjunctival fornix. The PERG and OPs have previously been examined and compared under both conditions. The aim of this study was to examine the ERG, flicker response and on-off responses with differing electrode positions. METHODS: Before recruitment, all subjects underwent an ophthalmological examination. We enrolled 13 normal control subjects into the study aged 13-64 years, all with a visual acuity of ≥1.0. We recorded scotopic and photopic ERGs, flicker and on-off responses, for both electrode positions. On the first day, one eye had the electrode placed on the cornea along the lower lid and the other eye had it positioned in the conjunctival sac. On a second day, the recordings were repeated with the alternative electrode placements. RESULTS: ERG, on-off and flicker responses were all smaller by between 20 and 25% when the DTL electrode was positioned in the conjunctival sac, compared to when it was positioned on the cornea, as did the scatter in the data points. This indicates that there is no advantage clinically for one or the other placement. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm other reports examining the effect of electrode position on electrophysiological potentials. When recording with the DTL electrode, it is important to ensure that it is placed at the same position in repeat recordings or in multicentre trials and that it is stable and does not move during recording.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
- 650 _2
- $a rohovka $x fyziologie $7 D003315
- 650 _2
- $a elektrofyziologie $x metody $7 D004594
- 650 _2
- $a elektroretinografie $x metody $7 D004596
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a mikroelektrody $7 D008839
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a světelná stimulace $x metody $7 D010775
- 650 _2
- $a retina $x fyziologie $7 D012160
- 650 _2
- $a zraková ostrost $7 D014792
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kramer, S $u Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Elfriede-Aulhorn Strasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Strasser, T $u Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Elfriede-Aulhorn Strasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Zrenner, E $u Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Elfriede-Aulhorn Strasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience (CIN), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Langrová, H $u University Eye Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010453 $t Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology $x 1573-2622 $g Roč. 134, č. 2 (2017), s. 129-134
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28224239 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170831111607 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1238954 $s 984186
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 134 $c 2 $d 129-134 $e 20170221 $i 1573-2622 $m Documenta ophthalmologica $n Doc Ophthalmol $x MED00010453
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170720