-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Re-visiting the Aphidius urticae s. str. group: re-description of Aphidius rubi Starý and A. silvaticus Starý (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae)
A. Jamhour, M. Mitrović, A. Petrović, P. Starý, Ž. Tomanović,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nový Zéland
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- druhová specificita MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- mitochondriální proteiny genetika MeSH
- mšice klasifikace genetika MeSH
- respirační komplex IV genetika MeSH
- sršňovití parazitologie MeSH
- taxonomické DNA čárové kódování MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Here we tested Aphidius urticae s. str. host-associated lineages from Microlophium carnosum (Buckton), Amphorophora rubi (Kaltenbach), Macrosiphum funestum (Macchiati) and Aulacorthum vaccinii Hille Ris Lambers with the barcoding region of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene used to analyse population differences and elucidate phylogenetic relationships between the separated taxa. This molecular marker has been shown to be the most informative molecular marker in resolving species complexes in aphidiine parasitoids. Analyses of the mitochondrial sequences revealed the existence of three clearly separated mitochondrial lineages of A. urticae s. str. group associated with: i) Macrosiphum funestum and Aulacorthum vaccinii aphid hosts, ii) Microlophium carnosum and iii) Amphorophora rubi. This corresponds to the initial descriptions of A. rubi, A. silvaticus and A. urticae and their aphid host associations prior to synonymization of A. rubi and A. silvaticus with A. urticae. On the other hand, significant evolutionary distances ranging from 2.3 to 9.2% between the three mitochondrial lineages were not accompanied by clear morphological differences. Therefore, re-descriptions of A. rubi and A. silvaticus are presented, together with their morphological differentiation in a key, as well as their phylogenetic relationships and genetical differentiation.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17023529
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170720124749.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170720s2016 nz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.11646/zootaxa.4178.2.6 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27811724
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a nz
- 100 1_
- $a Jamhour, Aiman $u Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.; Email: emohamed1513@yahoo.com.
- 245 10
- $a Re-visiting the Aphidius urticae s. str. group: re-description of Aphidius rubi Starý and A. silvaticus Starý (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) / $c A. Jamhour, M. Mitrović, A. Petrović, P. Starý, Ž. Tomanović,
- 520 9_
- $a Here we tested Aphidius urticae s. str. host-associated lineages from Microlophium carnosum (Buckton), Amphorophora rubi (Kaltenbach), Macrosiphum funestum (Macchiati) and Aulacorthum vaccinii Hille Ris Lambers with the barcoding region of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene used to analyse population differences and elucidate phylogenetic relationships between the separated taxa. This molecular marker has been shown to be the most informative molecular marker in resolving species complexes in aphidiine parasitoids. Analyses of the mitochondrial sequences revealed the existence of three clearly separated mitochondrial lineages of A. urticae s. str. group associated with: i) Macrosiphum funestum and Aulacorthum vaccinii aphid hosts, ii) Microlophium carnosum and iii) Amphorophora rubi. This corresponds to the initial descriptions of A. rubi, A. silvaticus and A. urticae and their aphid host associations prior to synonymization of A. rubi and A. silvaticus with A. urticae. On the other hand, significant evolutionary distances ranging from 2.3 to 9.2% between the three mitochondrial lineages were not accompanied by clear morphological differences. Therefore, re-descriptions of A. rubi and A. silvaticus are presented, together with their morphological differentiation in a key, as well as their phylogenetic relationships and genetical differentiation.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a mšice $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D001042
- 650 _2
- $a taxonomické DNA čárové kódování $7 D058893
- 650 _2
- $a respirační komplex IV $x genetika $7 D003576
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a mitochondriální proteiny $x genetika $7 D024101
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 _2
- $a druhová specificita $7 D013045
- 650 _2
- $a sršňovití $x parazitologie $7 D014863
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Mitrović, Milana $u Department of Plant Pests, Institute for Plant Protection and Environment, Banatska 33, 11080 Zemun, Serbia.; Email: milanadesancic@yahoo.co.uk.
- 700 1_
- $a Petrović, Andjeljko $u Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.; Email: unknown.
- 700 1_
- $a Starý, Petr $u Laboratory of Aphidology, Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Branišovská 31,37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic.; Email: stary@entu.cas.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Tomanović, Željko $u Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.; Email: ztoman@bio.bg.ac.rs.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00185816 $t Zootaxa $x 1175-5334 $g Roč. 4178, č. 2 (2016), s. 278-288
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27811724 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170720125242 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1239210 $s 984442
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 4178 $c 2 $d 278-288 $e 20161024 $i 1175-5334 $m Zootaxa $n Zootaxa $x MED00185816
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170720