• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Effect of a broad-spectrum LED curing light on the Knoop microhardness of four posterior resin based composites at 2, 4 and 6-mm depths

MM. ALShaafi, T. Haenel, B. Sullivan, D. Labrie, MQ. Alqahtani, RB. Price,

. 2016 ; 45 (-) : 14-8. [pub] 20151122

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17024208

OBJECTIVE: To measure the Knoop microhardness at the bottom of four posterior resin-based composites (RBCs): Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar Vivadent), SureFil SDR flow (DENTSPLY), SonicFill (Kerr), and x-tra fil (Voco). METHODS: The RBCs were expressed into metal rings that were 2, 4, or 6-mm thick with a 4-mm internal diameter at 30°C. The uncured specimens were covered by a Mylar strip and a Bluephase 20i (Ivoclar Vivadent) polywave(®) LED light-curing unit was used in high power setting for 20s. The specimens were then removed and placed immediately on a Knoop microhardness-testing device and the microhardness was measured at 9 points across top and bottom surfaces of each specimen. Five specimens were made for each condition. RESULTS: As expected, for each RBC there was no significant difference in the microhardness values at the top of the 2, 4 and 6-mm thick specimens. SureFil SDR Flow was the softest resin, but was the only resin that had no significant difference between the KHN values at the bottom of the 2 and 4-mm (Mixed Model ANOVA p<0.05). Although the KHN of SureFil SDR Flow was only marginally significantly different between the 2 and 6-mm thickness, the bottom at 6-mm was only 59% of the hardness measured at the top. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights that clinicians need to consider how the depth of cure was evaluated when determining the depth of cure. SureFil SDR Flow was the softest material and, in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, this RBC should be overlaid with a conventional resin.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17024208
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170831113005.0
007      
ta
008      
170720s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.004 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26593741
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a ALShaafi, Maan M $u King Saud University, Restorative Dental Sciences, P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia. $7 gn_A_00004841
245    10
$a Effect of a broad-spectrum LED curing light on the Knoop microhardness of four posterior resin based composites at 2, 4 and 6-mm depths / $c MM. ALShaafi, T. Haenel, B. Sullivan, D. Labrie, MQ. Alqahtani, RB. Price,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To measure the Knoop microhardness at the bottom of four posterior resin-based composites (RBCs): Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar Vivadent), SureFil SDR flow (DENTSPLY), SonicFill (Kerr), and x-tra fil (Voco). METHODS: The RBCs were expressed into metal rings that were 2, 4, or 6-mm thick with a 4-mm internal diameter at 30°C. The uncured specimens were covered by a Mylar strip and a Bluephase 20i (Ivoclar Vivadent) polywave(®) LED light-curing unit was used in high power setting for 20s. The specimens were then removed and placed immediately on a Knoop microhardness-testing device and the microhardness was measured at 9 points across top and bottom surfaces of each specimen. Five specimens were made for each condition. RESULTS: As expected, for each RBC there was no significant difference in the microhardness values at the top of the 2, 4 and 6-mm thick specimens. SureFil SDR Flow was the softest resin, but was the only resin that had no significant difference between the KHN values at the bottom of the 2 and 4-mm (Mixed Model ANOVA p<0.05). Although the KHN of SureFil SDR Flow was only marginally significantly different between the 2 and 6-mm thickness, the bottom at 6-mm was only 59% of the hardness measured at the top. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights that clinicians need to consider how the depth of cure was evaluated when determining the depth of cure. SureFil SDR Flow was the softest material and, in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, this RBC should be overlaid with a conventional resin.
650    _2
$a akrylové pryskyřice $x chemie $x účinky záření $7 D000180
650    _2
$a bisfenol A-glycidyl methakrylát $x chemie $x účinky záření $7 D017438
650    _2
$a složené pryskyřice $x chemie $x účinky záření $7 D003188
650    12
$a stomatologické polymerizační lampy $7 D055117
650    _2
$a zubní materiály $x chemie $x účinky záření $7 D003764
650    _2
$a analýza zatížení zubů $7 D003799
650    _2
$a dentální adheziva tuhnoucí světlem $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D055115
650    _2
$a testování materiálů $7 D008422
650    _2
$a methakryláty $x chemie $x účinky záření $7 D008689
650    _2
$a polymerizace $x účinky záření $7 D058105
650    _2
$a polyurethany $x chemie $x účinky záření $7 D011140
650    _2
$a povrchové vlastnosti $x účinky záření $7 D013499
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Haenel, Thomas $u Dental Clinical Sciences, Dalhousie University, P.O. Box 15000, Halifax, NS B3H4R2, Canada; University of Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, Applied Sciences, Department of Natural Sciences, von-Liebig-Strasse 20, 53359 Rhinebach, Germany; Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Faculty of Technology, náměstí T. G. Masaryka 275, 76272 Zlín, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sullivan, Braden $u Dental Clinical Sciences, Dalhousie University, P.O. Box 15000, Halifax, NS B3H4R2, Canada.
700    1_
$a Labrie, Daniel $u Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, P.O. BOX 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
700    1_
$a Alqahtani, Mohammed Q $u King Saud University, Restorative Dental Sciences, P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia. $7 gn_A_00004786
700    1_
$a Price, Richard B $u Dental Clinical Sciences, Dalhousie University, P.O. Box 15000, Halifax, NS B3H4R2, Canada. Electronic address: rbprice@Dal.ca.
773    0_
$w MED00002631 $t Journal of dentistry $x 1879-176X $g Roč. 45, č. - (2016), s. 14-8
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26593741 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170831113555 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1239889 $s 985121
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 45 $c - $d 14-8 $e 20151122 $i 1879-176X $m Journal of dentistry $n J Dent $x MED00002631
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace