• Something wrong with this record ?

Chemical angioplasty with spasmolytics for vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage

A. Hejčl, F. Cihlář, V. Smolka, P. Vachata, R. Bartoš, J. Procházka, J. Cihlář, M. Sameš,

. 2017 ; 159 (4) : 713-720. [pub] 20170221

Language English Country Austria

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
NT13883 MZ0 CEP Register

BACKGROUND: Clinically symptomatic vasospasm leading to delayed ischemic neurological deficits occurs in up to 30% of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Vasospasm can result in a serious decline in clinical conditions of patients with SAH, yet the algorithm for vasospasm treatment and prevention remains unclear. Intra-arterial administration of vasodilators is one of the modalities used for vasospasm therapy. METHODS: Over the last 7 years, we have treated 27 female and 7 male patients with vasospasm using intra-arterial administration of either nimodipine or milrinone; all had suffered aneurysm rupture. Of these patients, 28 were treated surgically (clip), and 6 patients had their aneurysm coiled. Spasmolytics were applied from day 2 to day 18 after rupture. RESULTS: Of the 53 procedures, angiographic improvement was documented in 92% of cases with a mean flow velocity decrease of 65 cm/s. Brain metabolism changes were monitored after the procedure. The highest level of immediate clinical improvement was observed in conscious patients with a focal neurological deficit (aphasia, hemiparesis). Overall clinical outcomes (Glasgow outcome scale, GOS) were as follows: GOS 5 (12 patients), GOS 4 (5 patients), GOS 3 (5 patients), GOS 2 (6 patients), and GOS 1 (6 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Intra-arterial administration of spasmolytics is a safe and potent method of vasospasm treatment. It is most effective when applied to conscious patients with a focal deficit. For unconscious patients, its therapeutic benefits are inconclusive. Patients in severe clinical states would further require use of other diagnostic tools such as multimodal brain monitoring to complement vasospasm therapy.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17031022
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181214104827.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2017 au f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00701-017-3104-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28224318
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a au
100    1_
$a Hejčl, Aleš, $u Department of Neurosurgery of the J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital, Sociální péče 12A, Ústí nad Labem, 401 13, Czech Republic. ales.hejcl@gmail.com. International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. ales.hejcl@gmail.com. Department of Neurosurgery of the 1st Medical Faculty and the Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. ales.hejcl@gmail.com. Department of Tissue Culture and Stem Cells, Institute of Experimental Medicine ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic. ales.hejcl@gmail.com. $d 1978- $7 xx0077402
245    10
$a Chemical angioplasty with spasmolytics for vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage / $c A. Hejčl, F. Cihlář, V. Smolka, P. Vachata, R. Bartoš, J. Procházka, J. Cihlář, M. Sameš,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Clinically symptomatic vasospasm leading to delayed ischemic neurological deficits occurs in up to 30% of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Vasospasm can result in a serious decline in clinical conditions of patients with SAH, yet the algorithm for vasospasm treatment and prevention remains unclear. Intra-arterial administration of vasodilators is one of the modalities used for vasospasm therapy. METHODS: Over the last 7 years, we have treated 27 female and 7 male patients with vasospasm using intra-arterial administration of either nimodipine or milrinone; all had suffered aneurysm rupture. Of these patients, 28 were treated surgically (clip), and 6 patients had their aneurysm coiled. Spasmolytics were applied from day 2 to day 18 after rupture. RESULTS: Of the 53 procedures, angiographic improvement was documented in 92% of cases with a mean flow velocity decrease of 65 cm/s. Brain metabolism changes were monitored after the procedure. The highest level of immediate clinical improvement was observed in conscious patients with a focal neurological deficit (aphasia, hemiparesis). Overall clinical outcomes (Glasgow outcome scale, GOS) were as follows: GOS 5 (12 patients), GOS 4 (5 patients), GOS 3 (5 patients), GOS 2 (6 patients), and GOS 1 (6 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Intra-arterial administration of spasmolytics is a safe and potent method of vasospasm treatment. It is most effective when applied to conscious patients with a focal deficit. For unconscious patients, its therapeutic benefits are inconclusive. Patients in severe clinical states would further require use of other diagnostic tools such as multimodal brain monitoring to complement vasospasm therapy.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a angioplastika $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D017130
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a intraarteriální infuze $x škodlivé účinky $7 D007261
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a nimodipin $x aplikace a dávkování $x terapeutické užití $7 D009553
650    _2
$a subarachnoidální krvácení $x farmakoterapie $7 D013345
650    _2
$a vazodilatancia $x aplikace a dávkování $x terapeutické užití $7 D014665
650    _2
$a intrakraniální vazospazmus $x farmakoterapie $7 D020301
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Cihlář, Filip $u Department of Radiology, Masaryk Hospital, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic. $7 xx0232583
700    1_
$a Smolka, Vojtěch $u Department of Radiology, Masaryk Hospital, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic. $7 xx0237397
700    1_
$a Vachata, Petr, $u Department of Neurosurgery of the J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital, Sociální péče 12A, Ústí nad Labem, 401 13, Czech Republic. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pilsen, The Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. $d 1973- $7 nlk20020123493
700    1_
$a Bartoš, Robert, $u Department of Neurosurgery of the J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital, Sociální péče 12A, Ústí nad Labem, 401 13, Czech Republic. $d 1974- $7 nlk20020123486
700    1_
$a Procházka, Jan, $u Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic. $d 1960 leden 20.- $7 nlk20020123489
700    1_
$a Cihlář, Jiří $u Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, J.E. Purkinje University, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic. $7 _AN063258
700    1_
$a Sameš, Martin, $u Department of Neurosurgery of the J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital, Sociální péče 12A, Ústí nad Labem, 401 13, Czech Republic. $d 1963- $7 nlk20020123488
773    0_
$w MED00009022 $t Acta neurochirurgica $x 0942-0940 $g Roč. 159, č. 4 (2017), s. 713-720
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28224318 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181214104953 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1254615 $s 992049
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 159 $c 4 $d 713-720 $e 20170221 $i 0942-0940 $m Acta neurochirurgica $n Acta Neurochir $x MED00009022
GRA    __
$a NT13883 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...