-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
A Ploidy Difference Represents an Impassable Barrier for Hybridisation in Animals. Is There an Exception among Botiid Loaches (Teleostei: Botiidae)
J. Bohlen, V. Šlechtová, V. Šlechta, V. Šlechtová, A. Sember, P. Ráb,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2006
Free Medical Journals
od 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
od 2006
PubMed Central
od 2006
Europe PubMed Central
od 2006
ProQuest Central
od 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-10-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
- MeSH
- chromozomy genetika MeSH
- cytochromy b genetika MeSH
- databáze genetické MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- hybridizace genetická * MeSH
- karyotypizace MeSH
- máloostní anatomie a histologie genetika MeSH
- pigmentace genetika MeSH
- ploidie * MeSH
- řeky MeSH
- sekvenční analýza DNA MeSH
- zeměpis MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Čína MeSH
One of the most efficient mechanisms to keep animal lineages separate is a difference in ploidy level (number of whole genome copies), since hybrid offspring from parents with different ploidy level are functionally sterile. In the freshwater fish family Botiidae, ploidy difference has been held responsible for the separation of its two subfamilies, the evolutionary tetraploid Botiinae and the diploid Leptobotiinae. Diploid and tetraploid species coexist in the upper Yangtze, the Pearl River and the Red River basins in China. Interestingly, the species 'Botia' zebra from the Pearl River basin combines a number of morphological characters that otherwise are found in the diploid genus Leptobotia with morphological characters of the tetraploid genus Sinibotia, therefore the aim of the present study is to test weather 'B.' zebra is the result of a hybridisation event between species from different subfamilies with different ploidy level. A closer morphological examination indeed demonstrates a high similarity of 'B.' zebra to two co-occurring species, the diploid Leptobotia guilinensis and the tetraploid Sinibotia pulchra. These two species thus could have been the potential parental species in case of a hybrid origin of 'B.' zebra. The morphologic analysis further reveals that 'B.' zebra bears even the diagnostic characters of the genera Leptobotia (Leptobotiinae) and Sinibotia (Botiinae). In contrast, a comparison of six allozyme loci between 'B.' zebra, L. guilinensis and S. pulchra showed only similarities between 'B.' zebra and S. pulchra, not between 'B.' zebra and L. guilinensis. Six specimens of 'B.' zebra that were cytogenetically analysed were tetraploid with 4n = 100. The composition of the karyotype (18% metacentric, 18% submetacentric, 36% subtelocentric and 28% acrocentric chromosomes) differs from those of L. guilinensis (12%, 24%, 20% and 44%) and S. pulchra (20%, 26%, 28% and 26%), and cannot be obtained by any combination of genomes from L. guilinensis and S. pulchra. Phylogenetic reconstructions based on sequence data of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and the nuclear RAG-1 gene invariably places 'Botia' zebra as sister species to S. pulchra, while L. guilinensis is only distantly related. The presented combination of genetic data demonstrates that 'B.' zebra is not the result of a hybridisation, but a species of tetraploid genus Sinibotia with a striking morphological evolution towards an enormous similarity with a co-occurring, but not directly related species. The complete lack of knowledge of the ecology of these species, their main predators or their ecological interactions hampers any conclusion regarding the evolutionary advantage of such adaptation.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17031567
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20171025123042.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 171025s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0159311 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27442252
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Bohlen, Jörg $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, v.v.i., Rumburská 89, 277 21 Liběchov, Czech Republic.
- 245 12
- $a A Ploidy Difference Represents an Impassable Barrier for Hybridisation in Animals. Is There an Exception among Botiid Loaches (Teleostei: Botiidae) / $c J. Bohlen, V. Šlechtová, V. Šlechta, V. Šlechtová, A. Sember, P. Ráb,
- 520 9_
- $a One of the most efficient mechanisms to keep animal lineages separate is a difference in ploidy level (number of whole genome copies), since hybrid offspring from parents with different ploidy level are functionally sterile. In the freshwater fish family Botiidae, ploidy difference has been held responsible for the separation of its two subfamilies, the evolutionary tetraploid Botiinae and the diploid Leptobotiinae. Diploid and tetraploid species coexist in the upper Yangtze, the Pearl River and the Red River basins in China. Interestingly, the species 'Botia' zebra from the Pearl River basin combines a number of morphological characters that otherwise are found in the diploid genus Leptobotia with morphological characters of the tetraploid genus Sinibotia, therefore the aim of the present study is to test weather 'B.' zebra is the result of a hybridisation event between species from different subfamilies with different ploidy level. A closer morphological examination indeed demonstrates a high similarity of 'B.' zebra to two co-occurring species, the diploid Leptobotia guilinensis and the tetraploid Sinibotia pulchra. These two species thus could have been the potential parental species in case of a hybrid origin of 'B.' zebra. The morphologic analysis further reveals that 'B.' zebra bears even the diagnostic characters of the genera Leptobotia (Leptobotiinae) and Sinibotia (Botiinae). In contrast, a comparison of six allozyme loci between 'B.' zebra, L. guilinensis and S. pulchra showed only similarities between 'B.' zebra and S. pulchra, not between 'B.' zebra and L. guilinensis. Six specimens of 'B.' zebra that were cytogenetically analysed were tetraploid with 4n = 100. The composition of the karyotype (18% metacentric, 18% submetacentric, 36% subtelocentric and 28% acrocentric chromosomes) differs from those of L. guilinensis (12%, 24%, 20% and 44%) and S. pulchra (20%, 26%, 28% and 26%), and cannot be obtained by any combination of genomes from L. guilinensis and S. pulchra. Phylogenetic reconstructions based on sequence data of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and the nuclear RAG-1 gene invariably places 'Botia' zebra as sister species to S. pulchra, while L. guilinensis is only distantly related. The presented combination of genetic data demonstrates that 'B.' zebra is not the result of a hybridisation, but a species of tetraploid genus Sinibotia with a striking morphological evolution towards an enormous similarity with a co-occurring, but not directly related species. The complete lack of knowledge of the ecology of these species, their main predators or their ecological interactions hampers any conclusion regarding the evolutionary advantage of such adaptation.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a Čína $7 D002681
- 650 _2
- $a chromozomy $x genetika $7 D002875
- 650 _2
- $a máloostní $x anatomie a histologie $x genetika $7 D003531
- 650 _2
- $a cytochromy b $x genetika $7 D045303
- 650 _2
- $a databáze genetické $7 D030541
- 650 _2
- $a zeměpis $7 D005843
- 650 12
- $a hybridizace genetická $7 D006824
- 650 _2
- $a karyotypizace $7 D007621
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 _2
- $a pigmentace $x genetika $7 D010858
- 650 12
- $a ploidie $7 D011003
- 650 _2
- $a řeky $7 D045483
- 650 _2
- $a sekvenční analýza DNA $7 D017422
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Šlechtová, Vendula $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, v.v.i., Rumburská 89, 277 21 Liběchov, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Šlechta, Vlastimil $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, v.v.i., Rumburská 89, 277 21 Liběchov, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Šlechtová, Vera $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, v.v.i., Rumburská 89, 277 21 Liběchov, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sember, Alexandr $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, v.v.i., Rumburská 89, 277 21 Liběchov, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Ráb, Petr $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, v.v.i., Rumburská 89, 277 21 Liběchov, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 11, č. 7 (2016), s. e0159311
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27442252 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20171025 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20171025123124 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1255160 $s 992594
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 11 $c 7 $d e0159311 $e 20160721 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20171025