-
Something wrong with this record ?
Interobserver Variation of the Bolus-and-Burst Method for Pancreatic Perfusion with Dynamic - Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
M. Stangeland, T. Engjom, M. Mezl, R. Jirik, OH. Gilja, G. Dimcevski, K. Nylund,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2015
PubMed Central
from 2015
Europe PubMed Central
from 2015
Open Access Digital Library
from 2015-01-01
Thieme Connect Journals Open Access
from 2015
PubMed
28932826
DOI
10.1055/s-0043-110475
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) can be used for calculating organ perfusion. By combining bolus injection with burst replenishment, the actual mean transit time (MTT) can be estimated. Blood volume (BV) can be obtained by scaling the data to a vessel on the imaging plane. The study aim was to test interobserver agreement for repeated recordings using the same ultrasound scanner and agreement between results on two different scanner systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients under evaluation for exocrine pancreatic failure were included. Each patient was scanned two times on a GE Logiq E9 scanner, by two different observers, and once on a Philips IU22 scanner, after a bolus of 1.5 ml Sonovue. A 60-second recording of contrast enhancement was performed before the burst and the scan continued for another 30 s for reperfusion. We performed data analysis using MATLAB-based DCE-US software. An artery in the same depth as the region of interest (ROI) was used for scaling. The measurements were compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman plots. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement on the Logiq E9 for MTT (ICC=0.83, confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.96) was excellent. There was poor agreement for MTT between the Logiq E9 and the IU22 (ICC=-0.084, CI -0.68-0.58). The interobserver agreement for blood volume measurements was excellent on the Logiq E9 (ICC=0.9286, CI 0.7250-0.98) and between scanners (ICC=0.86, CI=0.50-0.97). CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement was excellent using the same scanner for both parameters and between scanners for BV, but the comparison between two scanners did not yield acceptable agreement for MTT. This was probably due to incomplete bursting of bubbles in some of the recordings on the IU22.
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Institute of Scientific Instruments Brno Czech Republic
Department of Clinical Medicine University of Bergen Bergen Norway
Dept of Biomedical Engineering Brno Univ of Technology Brno Czech Republic
National Center of Ultrasound in Gastroenterology Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17031938
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250507155225.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 171025s2017 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1055/s-0043-110475 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28932826
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Stangeland, Marcus $u Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
- 245 10
- $a Interobserver Variation of the Bolus-and-Burst Method for Pancreatic Perfusion with Dynamic - Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound / $c M. Stangeland, T. Engjom, M. Mezl, R. Jirik, OH. Gilja, G. Dimcevski, K. Nylund,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) can be used for calculating organ perfusion. By combining bolus injection with burst replenishment, the actual mean transit time (MTT) can be estimated. Blood volume (BV) can be obtained by scaling the data to a vessel on the imaging plane. The study aim was to test interobserver agreement for repeated recordings using the same ultrasound scanner and agreement between results on two different scanner systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients under evaluation for exocrine pancreatic failure were included. Each patient was scanned two times on a GE Logiq E9 scanner, by two different observers, and once on a Philips IU22 scanner, after a bolus of 1.5 ml Sonovue. A 60-second recording of contrast enhancement was performed before the burst and the scan continued for another 30 s for reperfusion. We performed data analysis using MATLAB-based DCE-US software. An artery in the same depth as the region of interest (ROI) was used for scaling. The measurements were compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman plots. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement on the Logiq E9 for MTT (ICC=0.83, confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.96) was excellent. There was poor agreement for MTT between the Logiq E9 and the IU22 (ICC=-0.084, CI -0.68-0.58). The interobserver agreement for blood volume measurements was excellent on the Logiq E9 (ICC=0.9286, CI 0.7250-0.98) and between scanners (ICC=0.86, CI=0.50-0.97). CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement was excellent using the same scanner for both parameters and between scanners for BV, but the comparison between two scanners did not yield acceptable agreement for MTT. This was probably due to incomplete bursting of bubbles in some of the recordings on the IU22.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Engjom, Trond $u Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Department of Medicine, Haukeland Universitetssjukehus, Bergen, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Mézl, Martin $u Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Brno Univ. of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic. $7 xx0331830
- 700 1_
- $a Jirik, Radovan $u Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Gilja, Odd Helge $u Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. National Center of Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Dimcevski, Georg $u Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. National Center of Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Nylund, Kim $u National Center of Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00193476 $t Ultrasound international open $x 2509-596X $g Roč. 3, č. 3 (2017), s. E99-E106
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28932826 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20171025 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250507155223 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1255531 $s 992965
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 3 $c 3 $d E99-E106 $e 20170912 $i 2509-596X $m Ultrasound international open $n Ultrasound Int Open $x MED00193476
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20171025