Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Interobserver Variation of the Bolus-and-Burst Method for Pancreatic Perfusion with Dynamic - Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

M. Stangeland, T. Engjom, M. Mezl, R. Jirik, OH. Gilja, G. Dimcevski, K. Nylund,

. 2017 ; 3 (3) : E99-E106. [pub] 20170912

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

PURPOSE: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) can be used for calculating organ perfusion. By combining bolus injection with burst replenishment, the actual mean transit time (MTT) can be estimated. Blood volume (BV) can be obtained by scaling the data to a vessel on the imaging plane. The study aim was to test interobserver agreement for repeated recordings using the same ultrasound scanner and agreement between results on two different scanner systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients under evaluation for exocrine pancreatic failure were included. Each patient was scanned two times on a GE Logiq E9 scanner, by two different observers, and once on a Philips IU22 scanner, after a bolus of 1.5 ml Sonovue. A 60-second recording of contrast enhancement was performed before the burst and the scan continued for another 30 s for reperfusion. We performed data analysis using MATLAB-based DCE-US software. An artery in the same depth as the region of interest (ROI) was used for scaling. The measurements were compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman plots. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement on the Logiq E9 for MTT (ICC=0.83, confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.96) was excellent. There was poor agreement for MTT between the Logiq E9 and the IU22 (ICC=-0.084, CI -0.68-0.58). The interobserver agreement for blood volume measurements was excellent on the Logiq E9 (ICC=0.9286, CI 0.7250-0.98) and between scanners (ICC=0.86, CI=0.50-0.97). CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement was excellent using the same scanner for both parameters and between scanners for BV, but the comparison between two scanners did not yield acceptable agreement for MTT. This was probably due to incomplete bursting of bubbles in some of the recordings on the IU22.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17031938
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250507155225.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2017 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1055/s-0043-110475 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28932826
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Stangeland, Marcus $u Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
245    10
$a Interobserver Variation of the Bolus-and-Burst Method for Pancreatic Perfusion with Dynamic - Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound / $c M. Stangeland, T. Engjom, M. Mezl, R. Jirik, OH. Gilja, G. Dimcevski, K. Nylund,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) can be used for calculating organ perfusion. By combining bolus injection with burst replenishment, the actual mean transit time (MTT) can be estimated. Blood volume (BV) can be obtained by scaling the data to a vessel on the imaging plane. The study aim was to test interobserver agreement for repeated recordings using the same ultrasound scanner and agreement between results on two different scanner systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients under evaluation for exocrine pancreatic failure were included. Each patient was scanned two times on a GE Logiq E9 scanner, by two different observers, and once on a Philips IU22 scanner, after a bolus of 1.5 ml Sonovue. A 60-second recording of contrast enhancement was performed before the burst and the scan continued for another 30 s for reperfusion. We performed data analysis using MATLAB-based DCE-US software. An artery in the same depth as the region of interest (ROI) was used for scaling. The measurements were compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman plots. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement on the Logiq E9 for MTT (ICC=0.83, confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.96) was excellent. There was poor agreement for MTT between the Logiq E9 and the IU22 (ICC=-0.084, CI -0.68-0.58). The interobserver agreement for blood volume measurements was excellent on the Logiq E9 (ICC=0.9286, CI 0.7250-0.98) and between scanners (ICC=0.86, CI=0.50-0.97). CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement was excellent using the same scanner for both parameters and between scanners for BV, but the comparison between two scanners did not yield acceptable agreement for MTT. This was probably due to incomplete bursting of bubbles in some of the recordings on the IU22.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Engjom, Trond $u Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Department of Medicine, Haukeland Universitetssjukehus, Bergen, Norway.
700    1_
$a Mézl, Martin $u Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Brno Univ. of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic. $7 xx0331830
700    1_
$a Jirik, Radovan $u Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Gilja, Odd Helge $u Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. National Center of Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
700    1_
$a Dimcevski, Georg $u Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. National Center of Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
700    1_
$a Nylund, Kim $u National Center of Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
773    0_
$w MED00193476 $t Ultrasound international open $x 2509-596X $g Roč. 3, č. 3 (2017), s. E99-E106
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28932826 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250507155223 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1255531 $s 992965
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 3 $c 3 $d E99-E106 $e 20170912 $i 2509-596X $m Ultrasound international open $n Ultrasound Int Open $x MED00193476
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...