-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Staple line leak with peritonitis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy - a solution in one to six steps
P. Špička,
Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2006
Free Medical Journals
od 2006
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2006-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
PubMed
28694901
DOI
10.5114/wiitm.2017.68297
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most efficient bariatric interventions in morbidly obese patients. The most severe risk of this procedure seems to be the staple line leak, and the management of this complication can be very arduous. AIM: To share our experience in managing the staple line leak after LSG and to help to find the best procedure that should be preferred. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the 2010-2015 period we performed 223 LSG, with about 5 demonstrating severe complications - two patients with severe bleeding requiring revision surgery, and three patients with resection surface leak. RESULTS: We always primarily treated the staple line leak with a laparoscopic revision. Once the fistula did not spontaneously close after this treatment. A series of other methods were then indicated for this patient and only the sixth one resulted in the desirable therapeutic success. At first, our team opted for laparoscopic revision with drainage. The next procedure involved applying Ovesco and Boston clips. As a third method we performed abscess drainage through a nasobiliary tube inserted via gastroscopy. Due to failure we performed the second laparoscopic revision with staple line resuture, the next intervention was an open revision with fistula excision and suture, and finally we opted for the application of a self-expanding metallic stent, which proved to be definitely curative. CONCLUSIONS: Without any guidelines it is very difficult to determine the right procedure addressing the staple line leak after LSG. It depends mainly on the clinician's experience and is lengthy and often untraditional.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17032059
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20171103103249.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 171025s2017 pl f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5114/wiitm.2017.68297 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28694901
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a pl
- 100 1_
- $a Špička, Petr $u Department of Surgery, Prostějov Hospital, Prostějov, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Staple line leak with peritonitis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy - a solution in one to six steps / $c P. Špička,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most efficient bariatric interventions in morbidly obese patients. The most severe risk of this procedure seems to be the staple line leak, and the management of this complication can be very arduous. AIM: To share our experience in managing the staple line leak after LSG and to help to find the best procedure that should be preferred. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the 2010-2015 period we performed 223 LSG, with about 5 demonstrating severe complications - two patients with severe bleeding requiring revision surgery, and three patients with resection surface leak. RESULTS: We always primarily treated the staple line leak with a laparoscopic revision. Once the fistula did not spontaneously close after this treatment. A series of other methods were then indicated for this patient and only the sixth one resulted in the desirable therapeutic success. At first, our team opted for laparoscopic revision with drainage. The next procedure involved applying Ovesco and Boston clips. As a third method we performed abscess drainage through a nasobiliary tube inserted via gastroscopy. Due to failure we performed the second laparoscopic revision with staple line resuture, the next intervention was an open revision with fistula excision and suture, and finally we opted for the application of a self-expanding metallic stent, which proved to be definitely curative. CONCLUSIONS: Without any guidelines it is very difficult to determine the right procedure addressing the staple line leak after LSG. It depends mainly on the clinician's experience and is lengthy and often untraditional.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176919 $t Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques $x 1895-4588 $g Roč. 12, č. 2 (2017), s. 154-159
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28694901 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20171025 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20171103103344 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1255652 $s 993086
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 12 $c 2 $d 154-159 $e 20170613 $i 1895-4588 $m Wideochirurgia i Inne Techniki Mało Inwazyjne $n Wideochir. Inne Tech. Mało Inwazyjne $x MED00176919
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20171025