Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Routine use of intracardiac echocardiography for atrial flutter ablation is associated with reduced fluoroscopy time, but not with a reduction of radiofrequency energy delivery time

D. Herman, P. Osmancik, J. Zdarska, R. Prochazkova,

. 2017 ; 10 (2) : 1553. [pub] 20170831

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Background: The ablation of cavotricuspid-isthmus (CTI) atrial flutter (AFL) dependent atrial flutter could be difficult in patients with complex anatomy of the CTI.The aim of the study was to assess whether the use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was associated with less fluoroscopy time and faster ablations of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter (CTI-AFL). Methods: Patients with an indication for an ablation of a CTI-AFL were enrolled. Patients in which ablation of a CTI-AFLas part of an atrial fibrillation ablation were not included. Randomization was done using the envelope method. Standard techniques (i.e., coronary sinus, 20-polar halo catheter, and an ablation catheter), and criteria of success (bidirectional block through the CTI) were used. In patients randomized to the ablation with ICE, a 10F AcuNav ICE probe (Siemens, Germany)was used. Results: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled; 40 were randomized to ablation with ICE and 39 without ICE. The X-ray exposure was shorter (3.29±2.6 vs. 5.94±3.43 min, p<0.001) and total X-ray dose was reduced (3.30±1.98 vs. 6.68±5.25 Gy.cm2, p<0.001) in the ICE group. However, the total RF energy ablation time was not different between groups (ICE group: 604.56±380.46sec vs. 585.82±373.39 sec, p=0.8). The procedure duration was slightly longer in the ICE group (82.0±20.8 vs. 72.1±19.0 min, p=0.03). Procedural success was 100% (40/40) in the ICE group and 95% (37/39) in the control group. Two control patients required crossover to ICE at a prespecified point to achieve bidirectional block. There were two femoral hematomas in the ICE group and one in the control group. Conclusion: The use of ICE for atrial flutter ablation is associated with less fluoroscopy time and improved ability to achieve bidirectional block compared to traditional conventional flutter ablation methods. However, it is not asoociated with reduced ablation time or overall procedure duration.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18000883
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210204121730.0
007      
ta
008      
180116s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.4022/jafib.1553 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29250227
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Herman, Dalibor $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital KralovskeVinohrady Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Routine use of intracardiac echocardiography for atrial flutter ablation is associated with reduced fluoroscopy time, but not with a reduction of radiofrequency energy delivery time / $c D. Herman, P. Osmancik, J. Zdarska, R. Prochazkova,
520    9_
$a Background: The ablation of cavotricuspid-isthmus (CTI) atrial flutter (AFL) dependent atrial flutter could be difficult in patients with complex anatomy of the CTI.The aim of the study was to assess whether the use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was associated with less fluoroscopy time and faster ablations of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter (CTI-AFL). Methods: Patients with an indication for an ablation of a CTI-AFL were enrolled. Patients in which ablation of a CTI-AFLas part of an atrial fibrillation ablation were not included. Randomization was done using the envelope method. Standard techniques (i.e., coronary sinus, 20-polar halo catheter, and an ablation catheter), and criteria of success (bidirectional block through the CTI) were used. In patients randomized to the ablation with ICE, a 10F AcuNav ICE probe (Siemens, Germany)was used. Results: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled; 40 were randomized to ablation with ICE and 39 without ICE. The X-ray exposure was shorter (3.29±2.6 vs. 5.94±3.43 min, p<0.001) and total X-ray dose was reduced (3.30±1.98 vs. 6.68±5.25 Gy.cm2, p<0.001) in the ICE group. However, the total RF energy ablation time was not different between groups (ICE group: 604.56±380.46sec vs. 585.82±373.39 sec, p=0.8). The procedure duration was slightly longer in the ICE group (82.0±20.8 vs. 72.1±19.0 min, p=0.03). Procedural success was 100% (40/40) in the ICE group and 95% (37/39) in the control group. Two control patients required crossover to ICE at a prespecified point to achieve bidirectional block. There were two femoral hematomas in the ICE group and one in the control group. Conclusion: The use of ICE for atrial flutter ablation is associated with less fluoroscopy time and improved ability to achieve bidirectional block compared to traditional conventional flutter ablation methods. However, it is not asoociated with reduced ablation time or overall procedure duration.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Osmancik, Pavel $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital KralovskeVinohrady Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zdarska, Jana $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital KralovskeVinohrady Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Prochazkova, Radka $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital KralovskeVinohrady Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00165295 $t Journal of atrial fibrillation $x 1941-6911 $g Roč. 10, č. 2 (2017), s. 1553
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29250227 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180116 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210204121728 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1268278 $s 997545
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 10 $c 2 $d 1553 $e 20170831 $i 1941-6911 $m Journal of atrial fibrillation $n J Atr Fibrillation $x MED00165295
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180116

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...