-
Something wrong with this record ?
Routine use of intracardiac echocardiography for atrial flutter ablation is associated with reduced fluoroscopy time, but not with a reduction of radiofrequency energy delivery time
D. Herman, P. Osmancik, J. Zdarska, R. Prochazkova,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2008
PubMed Central
from 2008 to 2021
Europe PubMed Central
from 2008
Open Access Digital Library
from 2008-01-01
PubMed
29250227
DOI
10.4022/jafib.1553
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Background: The ablation of cavotricuspid-isthmus (CTI) atrial flutter (AFL) dependent atrial flutter could be difficult in patients with complex anatomy of the CTI.The aim of the study was to assess whether the use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was associated with less fluoroscopy time and faster ablations of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter (CTI-AFL). Methods: Patients with an indication for an ablation of a CTI-AFL were enrolled. Patients in which ablation of a CTI-AFLas part of an atrial fibrillation ablation were not included. Randomization was done using the envelope method. Standard techniques (i.e., coronary sinus, 20-polar halo catheter, and an ablation catheter), and criteria of success (bidirectional block through the CTI) were used. In patients randomized to the ablation with ICE, a 10F AcuNav ICE probe (Siemens, Germany)was used. Results: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled; 40 were randomized to ablation with ICE and 39 without ICE. The X-ray exposure was shorter (3.29±2.6 vs. 5.94±3.43 min, p<0.001) and total X-ray dose was reduced (3.30±1.98 vs. 6.68±5.25 Gy.cm2, p<0.001) in the ICE group. However, the total RF energy ablation time was not different between groups (ICE group: 604.56±380.46sec vs. 585.82±373.39 sec, p=0.8). The procedure duration was slightly longer in the ICE group (82.0±20.8 vs. 72.1±19.0 min, p=0.03). Procedural success was 100% (40/40) in the ICE group and 95% (37/39) in the control group. Two control patients required crossover to ICE at a prespecified point to achieve bidirectional block. There were two femoral hematomas in the ICE group and one in the control group. Conclusion: The use of ICE for atrial flutter ablation is associated with less fluoroscopy time and improved ability to achieve bidirectional block compared to traditional conventional flutter ablation methods. However, it is not asoociated with reduced ablation time or overall procedure duration.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18000883
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210204121730.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180116s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.4022/jafib.1553 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29250227
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Herman, Dalibor $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital KralovskeVinohrady Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Routine use of intracardiac echocardiography for atrial flutter ablation is associated with reduced fluoroscopy time, but not with a reduction of radiofrequency energy delivery time / $c D. Herman, P. Osmancik, J. Zdarska, R. Prochazkova,
- 520 9_
- $a Background: The ablation of cavotricuspid-isthmus (CTI) atrial flutter (AFL) dependent atrial flutter could be difficult in patients with complex anatomy of the CTI.The aim of the study was to assess whether the use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was associated with less fluoroscopy time and faster ablations of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter (CTI-AFL). Methods: Patients with an indication for an ablation of a CTI-AFL were enrolled. Patients in which ablation of a CTI-AFLas part of an atrial fibrillation ablation were not included. Randomization was done using the envelope method. Standard techniques (i.e., coronary sinus, 20-polar halo catheter, and an ablation catheter), and criteria of success (bidirectional block through the CTI) were used. In patients randomized to the ablation with ICE, a 10F AcuNav ICE probe (Siemens, Germany)was used. Results: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled; 40 were randomized to ablation with ICE and 39 without ICE. The X-ray exposure was shorter (3.29±2.6 vs. 5.94±3.43 min, p<0.001) and total X-ray dose was reduced (3.30±1.98 vs. 6.68±5.25 Gy.cm2, p<0.001) in the ICE group. However, the total RF energy ablation time was not different between groups (ICE group: 604.56±380.46sec vs. 585.82±373.39 sec, p=0.8). The procedure duration was slightly longer in the ICE group (82.0±20.8 vs. 72.1±19.0 min, p=0.03). Procedural success was 100% (40/40) in the ICE group and 95% (37/39) in the control group. Two control patients required crossover to ICE at a prespecified point to achieve bidirectional block. There were two femoral hematomas in the ICE group and one in the control group. Conclusion: The use of ICE for atrial flutter ablation is associated with less fluoroscopy time and improved ability to achieve bidirectional block compared to traditional conventional flutter ablation methods. However, it is not asoociated with reduced ablation time or overall procedure duration.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Osmancik, Pavel $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital KralovskeVinohrady Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zdarska, Jana $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital KralovskeVinohrady Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Prochazkova, Radka $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital KralovskeVinohrady Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00165295 $t Journal of atrial fibrillation $x 1941-6911 $g Roč. 10, č. 2 (2017), s. 1553
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29250227 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180116 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210204121728 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1268278 $s 997545
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 10 $c 2 $d 1553 $e 20170831 $i 1941-6911 $m Journal of atrial fibrillation $n J Atr Fibrillation $x MED00165295
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180116