-
Something wrong with this record ?
Evolutionarily Distant Streptophyta Respond Differently to Genotoxic Stress
R. Vágnerová, A. Lukešová, M. Lukeš, P. Rožnovská, M. Holá, J. Fulnečková, J. Fajkus, KJ. Angelis,
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2010
PubMed Central
from 2010
Europe PubMed Central
from 2010
ProQuest Central
from 2010-03-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2010
PubMed
29149093
DOI
10.3390/genes8110331
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Research in algae usually focuses on the description and characterization of morpho-and phenotype as a result of adaptation to a particular habitat and its conditions. To better understand the evolution of lineages we characterized responses of filamentous streptophyte green algae of the genera Klebsormidium and Zygnema, and of a land plant-the moss Physcomitrellapatens-to genotoxic stress that might be relevant to their environment. We studied the induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) elicited by the radiomimetic drug bleomycin, DNA single strand breaks (SSB) as consequence of base modification by the alkylation agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and of ultra violet (UV)-induced photo-dimers, because the mode of action of these three genotoxic agents is well understood. We show that the Klebsormidium and Physcomitrella are similarly sensitive to introduced DNA lesions and have similar rates of DSBs repair. In contrast, less DNA damage and higher repair rate of DSBs was detected in Zygnema, suggesting different mechanisms of maintaining genome integrity in response to genotoxic stress. Nevertheless, contrary to fewer detected lesions is Zygnema more sensitive to genotoxic treatment than Klebsormidium and Physcomitrella.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18000941
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180116123703.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180116s2017 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/genes8110331 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29149093
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Vágnerová, Radka $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Na Karlovce 1, 16000 Prague 6, Czech Republic. radka.vagnerova@centrum.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Evolutionarily Distant Streptophyta Respond Differently to Genotoxic Stress / $c R. Vágnerová, A. Lukešová, M. Lukeš, P. Rožnovská, M. Holá, J. Fulnečková, J. Fajkus, KJ. Angelis,
- 520 9_
- $a Research in algae usually focuses on the description and characterization of morpho-and phenotype as a result of adaptation to a particular habitat and its conditions. To better understand the evolution of lineages we characterized responses of filamentous streptophyte green algae of the genera Klebsormidium and Zygnema, and of a land plant-the moss Physcomitrellapatens-to genotoxic stress that might be relevant to their environment. We studied the induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) elicited by the radiomimetic drug bleomycin, DNA single strand breaks (SSB) as consequence of base modification by the alkylation agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and of ultra violet (UV)-induced photo-dimers, because the mode of action of these three genotoxic agents is well understood. We show that the Klebsormidium and Physcomitrella are similarly sensitive to introduced DNA lesions and have similar rates of DSBs repair. In contrast, less DNA damage and higher repair rate of DSBs was detected in Zygnema, suggesting different mechanisms of maintaining genome integrity in response to genotoxic stress. Nevertheless, contrary to fewer detected lesions is Zygnema more sensitive to genotoxic treatment than Klebsormidium and Physcomitrella.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Lukešová, Alena $u Biology Centre ASCR, v.v.i., Institute of Soil Biology, Na Sádkach 7, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic. luksa@upb.cas.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Lukeš, Martin $u Institute of Microbiology ASCR, Centrum Algatech, Laboratory of photosynthesis, Opatovický mlýn, 379 81 Třeboň, Czech Republic. lukesm@alga.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Rožnovská, Petra $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Na Karlovce 1, 16000 Prague 6, Czech Republic. roznovska@gmail.com.
- 700 1_
- $a Holá, Marcela $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Na Karlovce 1, 16000 Prague 6, Czech Republic. marcelahola@seznam.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Fulnečková, Jana $u Institute of Biophysics, Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Královopolská 135, 61265 Brno, Czech Republic. fulneckova@ibp.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Fajkus, Jiří $u Laboratory of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, NCBR, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic. fajkus@sci.muni.cz. Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, CEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University,Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic. fajkus@sci.muni.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Angelis, Karel J $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Na Karlovce 1, 16000 Prague 6, Czech Republic. karel.angelis@gmail.com.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00174652 $t Genes $x 2073-4425 $g Roč. 8, č. 11 (2017)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29149093 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180116 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180116123936 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1268336 $s 997603
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 8 $c 11 $e 20171117 $i 2073-4425 $m Genes $n Genes $x MED00174652
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180116