Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer

A. Gregor, E. Filová, M. Novák, J. Kronek, H. Chlup, M. Buzgo, V. Blahnová, V. Lukášová, M. Bartoš, A. Nečas, J. Hošek,

. 2017 ; 11 (-) : 31. [pub] 20171016

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
NV15-33629A MZ0 CEP Register
NV16-28637A MZ0 CEP Register

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of Tissue engineering is a regeneration or replacement of tissues or organs damaged by disease, injury, or congenital anomalies. At present, Tissue engineering repairs damaged tissues and organs with artificial supporting structures called scaffolds. These are used for attachment and subsequent growth of appropriate cells. During the cell growth gradual biodegradation of the scaffold occurs and the final product is a new tissue with the desired shape and properties. In recent years, research workplaces are focused on developing scaffold by bio-fabrication techniques to achieve fast, precise and cheap automatic manufacturing of these structures. Most promising techniques seem to be Rapid prototyping due to its high level of precision and controlling. However, this technique is still to solve various issues before it is easily used for scaffold fabrication. In this article we tested printing of clinically applicable scaffolds with use of commercially available devices and materials. Research presented in this article is in general focused on "scaffolding" on a field of bone tissue replacement. RESULTS: Commercially available 3D printer and Polylactic acid were used to create originally designed and possibly suitable scaffold structures for bone tissue engineering. We tested printing of scaffolds with different geometrical structures. Based on the osteosarcoma cells proliferation experiment and mechanical testing of designed scaffold samples, it will be stated that it is likely not necessary to keep the recommended porosity of the scaffold for bone tissue replacement at about 90%, and it will also be clarified why this fact eliminates mechanical properties issue. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the size of an individual pore could be double the size of the recommended range between 0.2-0.35 mm without affecting the cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: Rapid prototyping technique based on Fused deposition modelling was used for the fabrication of designed scaffold structures. All the experiments were performed in order to show how to possibly solve certain limitations and issues that are currently reported by research workplaces on the field of scaffold bio-fabrication. These results should provide new valuable knowledge for further research.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18001006
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210215123251.0
007      
ta
008      
180116s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13036-017-0074-3 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29046717
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Gregor, Aleš $u Department of Instrumentation and Control Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 4, 166 07 Prague 6, Czechia.
245    10
$a Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer / $c A. Gregor, E. Filová, M. Novák, J. Kronek, H. Chlup, M. Buzgo, V. Blahnová, V. Lukášová, M. Bartoš, A. Nečas, J. Hošek,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The primary objective of Tissue engineering is a regeneration or replacement of tissues or organs damaged by disease, injury, or congenital anomalies. At present, Tissue engineering repairs damaged tissues and organs with artificial supporting structures called scaffolds. These are used for attachment and subsequent growth of appropriate cells. During the cell growth gradual biodegradation of the scaffold occurs and the final product is a new tissue with the desired shape and properties. In recent years, research workplaces are focused on developing scaffold by bio-fabrication techniques to achieve fast, precise and cheap automatic manufacturing of these structures. Most promising techniques seem to be Rapid prototyping due to its high level of precision and controlling. However, this technique is still to solve various issues before it is easily used for scaffold fabrication. In this article we tested printing of clinically applicable scaffolds with use of commercially available devices and materials. Research presented in this article is in general focused on "scaffolding" on a field of bone tissue replacement. RESULTS: Commercially available 3D printer and Polylactic acid were used to create originally designed and possibly suitable scaffold structures for bone tissue engineering. We tested printing of scaffolds with different geometrical structures. Based on the osteosarcoma cells proliferation experiment and mechanical testing of designed scaffold samples, it will be stated that it is likely not necessary to keep the recommended porosity of the scaffold for bone tissue replacement at about 90%, and it will also be clarified why this fact eliminates mechanical properties issue. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the size of an individual pore could be double the size of the recommended range between 0.2-0.35 mm without affecting the cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: Rapid prototyping technique based on Fused deposition modelling was used for the fabrication of designed scaffold structures. All the experiments were performed in order to show how to possibly solve certain limitations and issues that are currently reported by research workplaces on the field of scaffold bio-fabrication. These results should provide new valuable knowledge for further research.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Filová, Eva $u Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 14220 Prague 4, Czechia. Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague 6, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Novák, Martin $u Department of Instrumentation and Control Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 4, 166 07 Prague 6, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Kronek, Jakub $u Department of Mechanics, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 4, 166 07 Prague 6, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Chlup, Hynek $u Department of Mechanics, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 4, 166 07 Prague 6, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Buzgo, Matěj $u University Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Třinecká 1024, 273 43 Buštěhrad, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Blahnová, Veronika $u Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 14220 Prague 4, Czechia. Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague 6, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Lukášová, Věra $u Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 14220 Prague 4, Czechia. Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 12843 Prague 2, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Bartoš, Martin $u Department of Stomatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Kateřinská 32, 12801 Prague 2, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Nečas, Alois $u University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciencies Brno, Palackého tř. 1946/1, 612 42 Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Hošek, Jan $u Department of Instrumentation and Control Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 4, 166 07 Prague 6, Czechia.
773    0_
$w MED00165987 $t Journal of biological engineering $x 1754-1611 $g Roč. 11, č. - (2017), s. 31
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29046717 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180116 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210215123250 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1268401 $s 997668
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 11 $c - $d 31 $e 20171016 $i 1754-1611 $m Journal of biological engineering $n J. biol. eng. $x MED00165987
GRA    __
$a NV15-33629A $p MZ0
GRA    __
$a NV16-28637A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180116

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...