-
Something wrong with this record ?
Placental Growth Factor in Bladder Cancer Compared to the Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Performance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
V. Soukup, O. Čapoun, M. Pešl, R. Sobotka, L. Vávřová, T. Hanuš, T. Zima, M. Kalousová,
Language English Country Greece
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2004 to 2 years ago
Open Access Digital Library
from 2004-01-01
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local blood diagnosis urine MeSH
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * blood diagnosis urine MeSH
- Placenta Growth Factor * blood urine MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A * blood urine MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic performance of urinary and plasma levels of placental growth factor (PLGF) and provide their comparison with the results of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) in patients with primary and recurrent urinary bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to assess urinary and plasma concentrations of PLGF and VEGF-A in 240 individuals. RESULTS: PLGF levels in urine and plasma were significantly higher in patients with primary bladder cancer than in healthy individuals (p=0.003, p=0.005, respectively). Area under the curve (AUC) of urinary PLGF was 0.68; AUC of plasma PLGF levels was 0.65. Patients with the urine levels of PLGF higher than 82.33 pg/ml had three times higher risk of recurrence. In patients with recurrent bladder cancer, the urinary concentrations of PLGF did not significantly differ from the concentrations in patients without current disease (p=0.61). However, plasma PLGF levels were significantly higher in patients diagnosed with tumor recurrence (p=0.001); AUC of plasma PLGF levels was 0.69. Moreover, patients with plasma levels higher than 10.09 pg/ml had a five-times higher risk of future tumor recurrence. The diagnostic accuracy of PLGF was comparable with VEGF-A. CONCLUSION: From a clinical point of view, PLGF could be considered a valid diagnostic test for the detection of primary and recurrent bladder cancer. In patients with recurrent bladder cancer, plasma PLGF levels can differentiate individuals at risk of tumor recurrence.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18010228
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200218090300.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180404s2018 gr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.21873/anticanres.12213 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29277778
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gr
- 100 1_
- $a Soukup, Viktor $u Department of Urology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic viktor.soukup@seznam.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Placental Growth Factor in Bladder Cancer Compared to the Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Performance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A / $c V. Soukup, O. Čapoun, M. Pešl, R. Sobotka, L. Vávřová, T. Hanuš, T. Zima, M. Kalousová,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic performance of urinary and plasma levels of placental growth factor (PLGF) and provide their comparison with the results of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) in patients with primary and recurrent urinary bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to assess urinary and plasma concentrations of PLGF and VEGF-A in 240 individuals. RESULTS: PLGF levels in urine and plasma were significantly higher in patients with primary bladder cancer than in healthy individuals (p=0.003, p=0.005, respectively). Area under the curve (AUC) of urinary PLGF was 0.68; AUC of plasma PLGF levels was 0.65. Patients with the urine levels of PLGF higher than 82.33 pg/ml had three times higher risk of recurrence. In patients with recurrent bladder cancer, the urinary concentrations of PLGF did not significantly differ from the concentrations in patients without current disease (p=0.61). However, plasma PLGF levels were significantly higher in patients diagnosed with tumor recurrence (p=0.001); AUC of plasma PLGF levels was 0.69. Moreover, patients with plasma levels higher than 10.09 pg/ml had a five-times higher risk of future tumor recurrence. The diagnostic accuracy of PLGF was comparable with VEGF-A. CONCLUSION: From a clinical point of view, PLGF could be considered a valid diagnostic test for the detection of primary and recurrent bladder cancer. In patients with recurrent bladder cancer, plasma PLGF levels can differentiate individuals at risk of tumor recurrence.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lokální recidiva nádoru $x krev $x diagnóza $x moč $7 D009364
- 650 12
- $a placentární růstový faktor $x krev $x moč $7 D000072483
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 12
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x krev $x diagnóza $x moč $7 D001749
- 650 12
- $a vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A $x krev $x moč $7 D042461
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Čapoun, Otakar $u Department of Urology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Pešl, Michael $u Department of Urology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sobotka, Roman $u Department of Urology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vávřová, Lucie $7 xx0245046 $u Department of Urology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hanuš, Tomáš $u Department of Urology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zima, Tomáš $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kalousová, Marta $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000478 $t Anticancer research $x 1791-7530 $g Roč. 38, č. 1 (2018), s. 239-246
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29277778 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200218090702 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1287713 $s 1007040
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 38 $c 1 $d 239-246 $i 1791-7530 $m Anticancer research $n Anticancer Res $x MED00000478
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180404