Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Placental Growth Factor in Bladder Cancer Compared to the Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Performance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

V. Soukup, O. Čapoun, M. Pešl, R. Sobotka, L. Vávřová, T. Hanuš, T. Zima, M. Kalousová,

. 2018 ; 38 (1) : 239-246.

Language English Country Greece

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic performance of urinary and plasma levels of placental growth factor (PLGF) and provide their comparison with the results of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) in patients with primary and recurrent urinary bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to assess urinary and plasma concentrations of PLGF and VEGF-A in 240 individuals. RESULTS: PLGF levels in urine and plasma were significantly higher in patients with primary bladder cancer than in healthy individuals (p=0.003, p=0.005, respectively). Area under the curve (AUC) of urinary PLGF was 0.68; AUC of plasma PLGF levels was 0.65. Patients with the urine levels of PLGF higher than 82.33 pg/ml had three times higher risk of recurrence. In patients with recurrent bladder cancer, the urinary concentrations of PLGF did not significantly differ from the concentrations in patients without current disease (p=0.61). However, plasma PLGF levels were significantly higher in patients diagnosed with tumor recurrence (p=0.001); AUC of plasma PLGF levels was 0.69. Moreover, patients with plasma levels higher than 10.09 pg/ml had a five-times higher risk of future tumor recurrence. The diagnostic accuracy of PLGF was comparable with VEGF-A. CONCLUSION: From a clinical point of view, PLGF could be considered a valid diagnostic test for the detection of primary and recurrent bladder cancer. In patients with recurrent bladder cancer, plasma PLGF levels can differentiate individuals at risk of tumor recurrence.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18010228
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200218090300.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2018 gr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.21873/anticanres.12213 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29277778
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gr
100    1_
$a Soukup, Viktor $u Department of Urology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic viktor.soukup@seznam.cz.
245    10
$a Placental Growth Factor in Bladder Cancer Compared to the Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Performance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A / $c V. Soukup, O. Čapoun, M. Pešl, R. Sobotka, L. Vávřová, T. Hanuš, T. Zima, M. Kalousová,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic performance of urinary and plasma levels of placental growth factor (PLGF) and provide their comparison with the results of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) in patients with primary and recurrent urinary bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to assess urinary and plasma concentrations of PLGF and VEGF-A in 240 individuals. RESULTS: PLGF levels in urine and plasma were significantly higher in patients with primary bladder cancer than in healthy individuals (p=0.003, p=0.005, respectively). Area under the curve (AUC) of urinary PLGF was 0.68; AUC of plasma PLGF levels was 0.65. Patients with the urine levels of PLGF higher than 82.33 pg/ml had three times higher risk of recurrence. In patients with recurrent bladder cancer, the urinary concentrations of PLGF did not significantly differ from the concentrations in patients without current disease (p=0.61). However, plasma PLGF levels were significantly higher in patients diagnosed with tumor recurrence (p=0.001); AUC of plasma PLGF levels was 0.69. Moreover, patients with plasma levels higher than 10.09 pg/ml had a five-times higher risk of future tumor recurrence. The diagnostic accuracy of PLGF was comparable with VEGF-A. CONCLUSION: From a clinical point of view, PLGF could be considered a valid diagnostic test for the detection of primary and recurrent bladder cancer. In patients with recurrent bladder cancer, plasma PLGF levels can differentiate individuals at risk of tumor recurrence.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $x krev $x diagnóza $x moč $7 D009364
650    12
$a placentární růstový faktor $x krev $x moč $7 D000072483
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    12
$a nádory močového měchýře $x krev $x diagnóza $x moč $7 D001749
650    12
$a vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A $x krev $x moč $7 D042461
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Čapoun, Otakar $u Department of Urology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pešl, Michael $u Department of Urology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sobotka, Roman $u Department of Urology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vávřová, Lucie $7 xx0245046 $u Department of Urology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hanuš, Tomáš $u Department of Urology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zima, Tomáš $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kalousová, Marta $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00000478 $t Anticancer research $x 1791-7530 $g Roč. 38, č. 1 (2018), s. 239-246
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29277778 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200218090702 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1287713 $s 1007040
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 38 $c 1 $d 239-246 $i 1791-7530 $m Anticancer research $n Anticancer Res $x MED00000478
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...