Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Comparative genomic and phylogenomic analyses of the Bifidobacteriaceae family

GA. Lugli, C. Milani, F. Turroni, S. Duranti, L. Mancabelli, M. Mangifesta, C. Ferrario, M. Modesto, P. Mattarelli, K. Jiří, D. van Sinderen, M. Ventura,

. 2017 ; 18 (1) : 568. [pub] 20170801

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Members of the Bifidobacteriaceae family represent both dominant microbial groups that colonize the gut of various animals, especially during the suckling stage of their life, while they also occur as pathogenic bacteria of the urogenital tract. The pan-genome of the genus Bifidobacterium has been explored in detail in recent years, though genomics of the Bifidobacteriaceae family has not yet received much attention. Here, a comparative genomic analyses of 67 Bifidobacteriaceae (sub) species including all currently recognized genera of this family, i.e., Aeriscardovia, Alloscardovia, Bifidobacterium, Bombiscardovia, Gardnerella, Neoscardovia, Parascardovia, Pseudoscardovia and Scardovia, was performed. Furthermore, in order to include a representative of each of the 67 (currently recognized) (sub) species belonging to the Bifidobacteriaceae family, we sequenced the genomes of an additional 11 species from this family, accomplishing the most extensive comparative genomic analysis performed within this family so far. RESULTS: Phylogenomics-based analyses revealed the deduced evolutionary pathway followed by each member of the Bifidobacteriaceae family, highlighting Aeriscardovia aeriphila LMG 21773 as the deepest branch in the evolutionary tree of this family. Furthermore, functional analyses based on genome content unveil connections between a given member of the family, its carbohydrate utilization abilities and its corresponding host. In this context, bifidobacterial (sub) species isolated from humans and monkeys possess the highest relative number of acquired glycosyl hydrolase-encoding genes, probably in order to enhance their metabolic ability to utilize different carbon sources consumed by the host. CONCLUSIONS: Within the Bifidobacteriaceae family, genomics of the genus Bifidobacterium has been extensively investigated. In contrast, very little is known about the genomics of members of the other eight genera of this family. In this study, we decoded the genome sequences of each member of the Bifidobacteriaceae family. Thanks to subsequent comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses, the deduced pan-genome of this family, as well as the predicted evolutionary development of each taxon belonging to this family was assessed.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18010399
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180418095536.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2017 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12864-017-3955-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28764658
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Lugli, Gabriele Andrea $u Laboratory of Probiogenomics, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
245    10
$a Comparative genomic and phylogenomic analyses of the Bifidobacteriaceae family / $c GA. Lugli, C. Milani, F. Turroni, S. Duranti, L. Mancabelli, M. Mangifesta, C. Ferrario, M. Modesto, P. Mattarelli, K. Jiří, D. van Sinderen, M. Ventura,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Members of the Bifidobacteriaceae family represent both dominant microbial groups that colonize the gut of various animals, especially during the suckling stage of their life, while they also occur as pathogenic bacteria of the urogenital tract. The pan-genome of the genus Bifidobacterium has been explored in detail in recent years, though genomics of the Bifidobacteriaceae family has not yet received much attention. Here, a comparative genomic analyses of 67 Bifidobacteriaceae (sub) species including all currently recognized genera of this family, i.e., Aeriscardovia, Alloscardovia, Bifidobacterium, Bombiscardovia, Gardnerella, Neoscardovia, Parascardovia, Pseudoscardovia and Scardovia, was performed. Furthermore, in order to include a representative of each of the 67 (currently recognized) (sub) species belonging to the Bifidobacteriaceae family, we sequenced the genomes of an additional 11 species from this family, accomplishing the most extensive comparative genomic analysis performed within this family so far. RESULTS: Phylogenomics-based analyses revealed the deduced evolutionary pathway followed by each member of the Bifidobacteriaceae family, highlighting Aeriscardovia aeriphila LMG 21773 as the deepest branch in the evolutionary tree of this family. Furthermore, functional analyses based on genome content unveil connections between a given member of the family, its carbohydrate utilization abilities and its corresponding host. In this context, bifidobacterial (sub) species isolated from humans and monkeys possess the highest relative number of acquired glycosyl hydrolase-encoding genes, probably in order to enhance their metabolic ability to utilize different carbon sources consumed by the host. CONCLUSIONS: Within the Bifidobacteriaceae family, genomics of the genus Bifidobacterium has been extensively investigated. In contrast, very little is known about the genomics of members of the other eight genera of this family. In this study, we decoded the genome sequences of each member of the Bifidobacteriaceae family. Thanks to subsequent comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses, the deduced pan-genome of this family, as well as the predicted evolutionary development of each taxon belonging to this family was assessed.
650    _2
$a Bifidobacterium $x genetika $7 D001644
650    _2
$a molekulární evoluce $7 D019143
650    12
$a genomika $7 D023281
650    12
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Milani, Christian $u Laboratory of Probiogenomics, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
700    1_
$a Turroni, Francesca $u Laboratory of Probiogenomics, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
700    1_
$a Duranti, Sabrina $u Laboratory of Probiogenomics, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
700    1_
$a Mancabelli, Leonardo $u Laboratory of Probiogenomics, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
700    1_
$a Mangifesta, Marta $u GenProbio srl, Parma, Italy.
700    1_
$a Ferrario, Chiara $u Laboratory of Probiogenomics, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
700    1_
$a Modesto, Monica $u Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
700    1_
$a Mattarelli, Paola $u Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
700    1_
$a Jiří, Killer $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a van Sinderen, Douwe $u APC Microbiome Institute and School of Microbiology, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
700    1_
$a Ventura, Marco $u Laboratory of Probiogenomics, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. marco.ventura@unipr.it.
773    0_
$w MED00008181 $t BMC genomics $x 1471-2164 $g Roč. 18, č. 1 (2017), s. 568
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28764658 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180418095636 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1287884 $s 1007211
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 18 $c 1 $d 568 $e 20170801 $i 1471-2164 $m BMC genomics $n BMC Genomics $x MED00008181
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...