-
Something wrong with this record ?
Incorporating thyroid markers in Down syndrome screening protocols
I. Dhaifalah, T. Salek, D. Langova, H. Cuckle,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article
PubMed
28374559
DOI
10.1002/pd.5047
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Biomarkers blood MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Down Syndrome blood complications diagnosis physiopathology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Thyroid Diseases blood diagnosis MeSH
- Mass Screening methods MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Prenatal Diagnosis methods MeSH
- Pregnancy Trimester, First blood MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Thyroid Gland physiopathology MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Thyroid Function Tests methods MeSH
- Thyrotropin analysis blood MeSH
- Thyroxine analysis blood MeSH
- Cell-Free Nucleic Acids analysis blood MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Evaluation Study MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The article aimed to assess the benefit of incorporating maternal serum thyroid disease marker levels (thyroid-stimulating hormone and free thyroxine) into first trimester Down syndrome screening protocols. METHODS: Statistical modelling was used to predict performance with and without the thyroid markers. Two protocols were considered: the combined test and the contingent cell-free DNA (cfDNA) test, where 15-40% women are selected for cfDNA because of increased risk based on combined test results. Published parameters were used for the combined test, cfDNA and the Down syndrome means for thyroid-stimulating hormone and free thyroxine; other parameters were derived from a series of 5230 women screened for both thyroid disease and Down syndrome. RESULTS: Combined test: For a fixed 85% detection rate, the predicted false positive rate was reduced from 5.3% to 3.6% with the addition of the thyroid markers. Contingent cfDNA test: For a fixed 95% detection rate, the proportion of women selected for cfDNA was reduced from 25.6% to 20.2%. CONCLUSIONS: When screening simultaneously for maternal thyroid disease and Down syndrome, thyroid marker levels should be used in the calculation of Down syndrome risk. The benefit is modest but can be achieved with no additional cost. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Department of Clinical Biochemistry Tomas Bata Regional Hospital Zlin Czech Republic
Department of Internal Medicine Clinic Tomas Bata Regional Hospital Zlin Czech Republic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Columbia University Medical Centre New York NY USA
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18010703
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180416142159.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180404s2017 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/pd.5047 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28374559
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Dhaifalah, Ishraq $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tomas Bata Regional Hospital, Zlin, Czech Republic. Center of Fetal Medicine and Medical Genetics (FETMED), Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Incorporating thyroid markers in Down syndrome screening protocols / $c I. Dhaifalah, T. Salek, D. Langova, H. Cuckle,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: The article aimed to assess the benefit of incorporating maternal serum thyroid disease marker levels (thyroid-stimulating hormone and free thyroxine) into first trimester Down syndrome screening protocols. METHODS: Statistical modelling was used to predict performance with and without the thyroid markers. Two protocols were considered: the combined test and the contingent cell-free DNA (cfDNA) test, where 15-40% women are selected for cfDNA because of increased risk based on combined test results. Published parameters were used for the combined test, cfDNA and the Down syndrome means for thyroid-stimulating hormone and free thyroxine; other parameters were derived from a series of 5230 women screened for both thyroid disease and Down syndrome. RESULTS: Combined test: For a fixed 85% detection rate, the predicted false positive rate was reduced from 5.3% to 3.6% with the addition of the thyroid markers. Contingent cfDNA test: For a fixed 95% detection rate, the proportion of women selected for cfDNA was reduced from 25.6% to 20.2%. CONCLUSIONS: When screening simultaneously for maternal thyroid disease and Down syndrome, thyroid marker levels should be used in the calculation of Down syndrome risk. The benefit is modest but can be achieved with no additional cost. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a biologické markery $x krev $7 D015415
- 650 _2
- $a volné cirkulující nukleové kyseliny $x analýza $x krev $7 D000073888
- 650 _2
- $a Downův syndrom $x krev $x komplikace $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D004314
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a plošný screening $x metody $7 D008403
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a první trimestr těhotenství $x krev $7 D011261
- 650 _2
- $a prenatální diagnóza $x metody $7 D011296
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci štítné žlázy $x krev $x diagnóza $7 D013959
- 650 _2
- $a testy funkce štítné žlázy $x metody $7 D013960
- 650 _2
- $a štítná žláza $x patofyziologie $7 D013961
- 650 _2
- $a thyreotropin $x analýza $x krev $7 D013972
- 650 _2
- $a thyroxin $x analýza $x krev $7 D013974
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Salek, Tomas $u Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Tomas Bata Regional Hospital, Zlin, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Langova, Dagmar $u Department of Internal Medicine Clinic, Tomas Bata Regional Hospital, Zlin, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Cuckle, Howard $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Columbia University Medical Centre, New York, NY, USA.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003882 $t Prenatal diagnosis $x 1097-0223 $g Roč. 37, č. 5 (2017), s. 510-514
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28374559 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180416142256 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1288188 $s 1007515
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 37 $c 5 $d 510-514 $e 20170424 $i 1097-0223 $m Prenatal diagnosis $n Prenat Diagn $x MED00003882
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180404