-
Something wrong with this record ?
A Call for New Communication Channels for Gynecological Oncology Trainees: A Survey on Social Media Use and Educational Needs by the European Network of Young Gynecological Oncologists
K. Zalewski, K. Lindemann, MJ. Halaska, I. Zapardiel, R. Laky, E. Chereau, D. Lindquist, S. Polterauer, V. Sukhin, P. Dursun,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Gynecology education MeSH
- Communication * MeSH
- Education, Medical, Continuing methods MeSH
- Medical Oncology education MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Social Media * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess patterns in the use of social media (SM) platforms and to identify the training needs among European gynecologic oncology trainees. METHODS: In 2014, a web-based survey was sent to 633 trainees from the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists (ENYGO) database. The 14-item questionnaire (partially using a 1- to 5-point Likert scale) assessed respondents' use of SM and preference for workshop content and organization. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the mean scores reported for different items, and the internal reliability of the questionnaire was assessed by Cronbach α. RESULTS: In total, 170 ENYGO members (27%) responded to the survey. Of those, 91% said that they use SM platforms, mostly for private purposes. Twenty-three percent used SM professionally and 43% indicated that they would consider SM to be a clinical discussion forum. The respondents said that they would like updates on conferences and professional activities to be shared on SM platforms. Complication management, surgical anatomy, and state of the art in gynecologic oncology were identified as preferred workshops topics. The most frequently indicated hands-on workshops were laparoscopic techniques and surgical anatomy. Consultants attached a higher level of importance to palliative care education and communication training than trainees. The mean duration of the workshop preferred was 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: This report highlights the significance of ENYGO trainees' attachment to SM platforms. Most respondents expect ENYGO to use these online channels for promoting educational activities and other updates. Using SM for clinical discussion will require specific guidelines to secure professional and also consumer integrity. This survey confirms surgical management and the state of the art as important knowledge gaps, and ENYGO has tailored its activities according to these results. Future activities will further direct attention and resources to education in palliative care and molecular tumor biology.
§§Department of Radiation Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden
§NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre University of Sydney
¶Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 3rd Medical Faculty Charles University
**Gynecologic Oncology Unit La Paz University Hospital IdiPAZ Madrid Spain
††Division of Gynecology Medical University Graz Austria
†Department of Gynaecologic Oncology Holycross Cancer Center Kielce Poland
‡‡Institut Paoli Calmettes Marseille France
‡The Norwegian Radium Hospital Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18010808
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180404142309.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180404s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000917 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28187096
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Zalewski, Kamil $u *Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw; †Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland; ‡The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; §NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney; ∥Department of Medical Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead University Hospital, Sydney, Australia; ¶Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University; and #Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic; **Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; ††Division of Gynecology, Medical University Graz, Austria; ‡‡Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; §§Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; ∥∥Department of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; ¶¶Department of Gynecological Oncology, Grigoriev Institute of Medical Radiology, NAMS of Ukraine, Kharkov, Ukraine; and ##Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
- 245 12
- $a A Call for New Communication Channels for Gynecological Oncology Trainees: A Survey on Social Media Use and Educational Needs by the European Network of Young Gynecological Oncologists / $c K. Zalewski, K. Lindemann, MJ. Halaska, I. Zapardiel, R. Laky, E. Chereau, D. Lindquist, S. Polterauer, V. Sukhin, P. Dursun,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess patterns in the use of social media (SM) platforms and to identify the training needs among European gynecologic oncology trainees. METHODS: In 2014, a web-based survey was sent to 633 trainees from the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists (ENYGO) database. The 14-item questionnaire (partially using a 1- to 5-point Likert scale) assessed respondents' use of SM and preference for workshop content and organization. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the mean scores reported for different items, and the internal reliability of the questionnaire was assessed by Cronbach α. RESULTS: In total, 170 ENYGO members (27%) responded to the survey. Of those, 91% said that they use SM platforms, mostly for private purposes. Twenty-three percent used SM professionally and 43% indicated that they would consider SM to be a clinical discussion forum. The respondents said that they would like updates on conferences and professional activities to be shared on SM platforms. Complication management, surgical anatomy, and state of the art in gynecologic oncology were identified as preferred workshops topics. The most frequently indicated hands-on workshops were laparoscopic techniques and surgical anatomy. Consultants attached a higher level of importance to palliative care education and communication training than trainees. The mean duration of the workshop preferred was 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: This report highlights the significance of ENYGO trainees' attachment to SM platforms. Most respondents expect ENYGO to use these online channels for promoting educational activities and other updates. Using SM for clinical discussion will require specific guidelines to secure professional and also consumer integrity. This survey confirms surgical management and the state of the art as important knowledge gaps, and ENYGO has tailored its activities according to these results. Future activities will further direct attention and resources to education in palliative care and molecular tumor biology.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a komunikace $7 D003142
- 650 _2
- $a kontinuální vzdělávání lékařů $x metody $7 D004502
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a gynekologie $x výchova $7 D006176
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lékařská onkologie $x výchova $7 D008495
- 650 12
- $a sociální média $7 D061108
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Lindemann, Kristina
- 700 1_
- $a Halaska, Michael J
- 700 1_
- $a Zapardiel, Ignacio
- 700 1_
- $a Laky, Rene
- 700 1_
- $a Chereau, Elisabeth
- 700 1_
- $a Lindquist, David
- 700 1_
- $a Polterauer, Stephan
- 700 1_
- $a Sukhin, Vladislav
- 700 1_
- $a Dursun, Polat
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009896 $t International journal of gynecological cancer official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society $x 1525-1438 $g Roč. 27, č. 3 (2017), s. 620-626
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28187096 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180404142349 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1288293 $s 1007620
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 27 $c 3 $d 620-626 $i 1525-1438 $m International journal of gynecological cancer $n Int J Gynecol Cancer $x MED00009896
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180404