-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Bayesian Phylogenetic Estimation of Clade Ages Supports Trans-Atlantic Dispersal of Cichlid Fishes
M. Matschiner, Z. Musilová, JM. Barth, Z. Starostová, W. Salzburger, M. Steel, R. Bouckaert,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
28173588
DOI
10.1093/sysbio/syw076
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Bayesova věta MeSH
- biodiverzita MeSH
- biologické modely * MeSH
- čas MeSH
- cichlidy klasifikace MeSH
- fylogeneze * MeSH
- vznik druhů (genetika) MeSH
- zkameněliny MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Atlantský oceán MeSH
Divergence-time estimation based on molecular phylogenies and the fossil record has provided insights into fundamental questions of evolutionary biology. In Bayesian node dating, phylogenies are commonly time calibrated through the specification of calibration densities on nodes representing clades with known fossil occurrences. Unfortunately, the optimal shape of these calibration densities is usually unknown and they are therefore often chosen arbitrarily, which directly impacts the reliability of the resulting age estimates. As possible solutions to this problem, two nonexclusive alternative approaches have recently been developed, the “fossilized birth–death” (FBD) model and “total-evidence dating.” While these approaches have been shown to perform well under certain conditions, they require including all (or a random subset) of the fossils of each clade in the analysis, rather than just relying on the oldest fossils of clades. In addition, both approaches assume that fossil records of different clades in the phylogeny are all the product of the same underlying fossil sampling rate, even though this rate has been shown to differ strongly between higher level taxa. We here develop a flexible new approach to Bayesian age estimation that combines advantages of node dating and the FBD model. In our new approach, calibration densities are defined on the basis of first fossil occurrences and sampling rate estimates that can be specified separately for all clades. We verify our approach with a large number of simulated data sets, and compare its performance to that of the FBD model. We find that our approach produces reliable age estimates that are robust to model violation, on par with the FBD model. By applying our approach to a large data set including sequence data from over 1000 species of teleost fishes as well as 147 carefully selected fossil constraints, we recover a timeline of teleost diversification that is incompatible with previously assumed vicariant divergences of freshwater fishes. Our results instead provide strong evidence for transoceanic dispersal of cichlids and other groups of teleost fishes.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand
Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18010818
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240620151311.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180404s2017 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/sysbio/syw076 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28173588
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Matschiner, Michael $u Department of Biosciences, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
- 245 10
- $a Bayesian Phylogenetic Estimation of Clade Ages Supports Trans-Atlantic Dispersal of Cichlid Fishes / $c M. Matschiner, Z. Musilová, JM. Barth, Z. Starostová, W. Salzburger, M. Steel, R. Bouckaert,
- 520 9_
- $a Divergence-time estimation based on molecular phylogenies and the fossil record has provided insights into fundamental questions of evolutionary biology. In Bayesian node dating, phylogenies are commonly time calibrated through the specification of calibration densities on nodes representing clades with known fossil occurrences. Unfortunately, the optimal shape of these calibration densities is usually unknown and they are therefore often chosen arbitrarily, which directly impacts the reliability of the resulting age estimates. As possible solutions to this problem, two nonexclusive alternative approaches have recently been developed, the “fossilized birth–death” (FBD) model and “total-evidence dating.” While these approaches have been shown to perform well under certain conditions, they require including all (or a random subset) of the fossils of each clade in the analysis, rather than just relying on the oldest fossils of clades. In addition, both approaches assume that fossil records of different clades in the phylogeny are all the product of the same underlying fossil sampling rate, even though this rate has been shown to differ strongly between higher level taxa. We here develop a flexible new approach to Bayesian age estimation that combines advantages of node dating and the FBD model. In our new approach, calibration densities are defined on the basis of first fossil occurrences and sampling rate estimates that can be specified separately for all clades. We verify our approach with a large number of simulated data sets, and compare its performance to that of the FBD model. We find that our approach produces reliable age estimates that are robust to model violation, on par with the FBD model. By applying our approach to a large data set including sequence data from over 1000 species of teleost fishes as well as 147 carefully selected fossil constraints, we recover a timeline of teleost diversification that is incompatible with previously assumed vicariant divergences of freshwater fishes. Our results instead provide strong evidence for transoceanic dispersal of cichlids and other groups of teleost fishes.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a Atlantský oceán $7 D001267
- 650 _2
- $a Bayesova věta $7 D001499
- 650 _2
- $a biodiverzita $7 D044822
- 650 _2
- $a cichlidy $x klasifikace $7 D023681
- 650 _2
- $a zkameněliny $7 D005580
- 650 _2
- $a vznik druhů (genetika) $7 D049810
- 650 12
- $a biologické modely $7 D008954
- 650 12
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 _2
- $a čas $7 D013995
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Musilová, Zuzana $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. $7 xx0205882
- 700 1_
- $a Barth, Julia M I $u Department of Biosciences, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Starostová, Zuzana $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Salzburger, Walter $u Department of Biosciences, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Steel, Mike $u Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
- 700 1_
- $a Bouckaert, Remco $u Department of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Computational Evolution Group, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005998 $t Systematic biology $x 1076-836X $g Roč. 66, č. 1 (2017), s. 3-22
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28173588 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240620151311 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1288303 $s 1007630
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 66 $c 1 $d 3-22 $i 1076-836X $m Systematic biology $n Syst Biol $x MED00005998
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180404