• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Patterns of MHC-dependent mate selection in humans and nonhuman primates: a meta-analysis

J. Winternitz, JL. Abbate, E. Huchard, J. Havlíček, LZ. Garamszegi,

. 2017 ; 26 (2) : 668-688. [pub] 20161205

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18010936

Genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in vertebrates are integral for effective adaptive immune response and are associated with sexual selection. Evidence from a range of vertebrates supports MHC-based preference for diverse and dissimilar mating partners, but evidence from human mate choice studies has been disparate and controversial. Methodologies and sampling peculiarities specific to human studies make it difficult to know whether wide discrepancies in results among human populations are real or artefact. To better understand what processes may affect MHC-mediated mate choice across humans and nonhuman primates, we performed phylogenetically controlled meta-analyses using 58 effect sizes from 30 studies across seven primate species. Primates showed a general trend favouring more MHC-diverse mates, which was statistically significant for humans. In contrast, there was no tendency for MHC-dissimilar mate choice, and for humans, we observed effect sizes indicating selection of both MHC-dissimilar and MHC-similar mates. Focusing on MHC-similar effect sizes only, we found evidence that preference for MHC similarity was an artefact of population ethnic heterogeneity in observational studies but not among experimental studies with more control over sociocultural biases. This suggests that human assortative mating biases may be responsible for some patterns of MHC-based mate choice. Additionally, the overall effect sizes of primate MHC-based mating preferences are relatively weak (Fisher's Z correlation coefficient for dissimilarity Zr = 0.044, diversity Zr = 0.153), calling for careful sampling design in future studies. Overall, our results indicate that preference for more MHC-diverse mates is significant for humans and likely conserved across primates.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18010936
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180404142418.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2017 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/mec.13920 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27859823
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Winternitz, J $u Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Strasse 2, 24306, Ploen, Germany. Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Květná 8, 603 65, Brno, Czech Republic. Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Lidická 25/27, 657 20, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Patterns of MHC-dependent mate selection in humans and nonhuman primates: a meta-analysis / $c J. Winternitz, JL. Abbate, E. Huchard, J. Havlíček, LZ. Garamszegi,
520    9_
$a Genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in vertebrates are integral for effective adaptive immune response and are associated with sexual selection. Evidence from a range of vertebrates supports MHC-based preference for diverse and dissimilar mating partners, but evidence from human mate choice studies has been disparate and controversial. Methodologies and sampling peculiarities specific to human studies make it difficult to know whether wide discrepancies in results among human populations are real or artefact. To better understand what processes may affect MHC-mediated mate choice across humans and nonhuman primates, we performed phylogenetically controlled meta-analyses using 58 effect sizes from 30 studies across seven primate species. Primates showed a general trend favouring more MHC-diverse mates, which was statistically significant for humans. In contrast, there was no tendency for MHC-dissimilar mate choice, and for humans, we observed effect sizes indicating selection of both MHC-dissimilar and MHC-similar mates. Focusing on MHC-similar effect sizes only, we found evidence that preference for MHC similarity was an artefact of population ethnic heterogeneity in observational studies but not among experimental studies with more control over sociocultural biases. This suggests that human assortative mating biases may be responsible for some patterns of MHC-based mate choice. Additionally, the overall effect sizes of primate MHC-based mating preferences are relatively weak (Fisher's Z correlation coefficient for dissimilarity Zr = 0.044, diversity Zr = 0.153), calling for careful sampling design in future studies. Overall, our results indicate that preference for more MHC-diverse mates is significant for humans and likely conserved across primates.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a populační genetika $7 D005828
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hlavní histokompatibilní komplex $x genetika $7 D008285
650    12
$a manželství $7 D008393
650    12
$a sexuální výběr u zvířat $7 D052586
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
700    1_
$a Abbate, J L $u Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Balterstrasse 6, 3006, Bern, Switzerland. INRA - UMR 1062 CBGP (INRA, IRD, CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro), 755 Avenue du campus Agropolis, 34988, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France.
700    1_
$a Huchard, E $u CEFE UMR5175, CNRS - Université de Montpellier - EPHE, 1919 Route de Mende, 34295, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
700    1_
$a Havlíček, J $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Garamszegi, L Z $u Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Estación Biológica de Doñana-CSIC, c/Americo Vespucio, s/n, 41092, Seville, Spain.
773    0_
$w MED00006323 $t Molecular ecology $x 1365-294X $g Roč. 26, č. 2 (2017), s. 668-688
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27859823 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180404142458 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288421 $s 1007748
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 26 $c 2 $d 668-688 $e 20161205 $i 1365-294X $m Molecular ecology $n Mol Ecol $x MED00006323
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...