-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Flecainide versus digoxin for fetal supraventricular tachycardia: Comparison of two drug treatment protocols
S. Sridharan, I. Sullivan, V. Tomek, J. Wolfenden, J. Škovránek, R. Yates, J. Janoušek, TE. Dominguez, J. Marek,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- antiarytmika aplikace a dávkování krev MeSH
- aplikace orální MeSH
- digoxin aplikace a dávkování krev MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- echokardiografie MeSH
- edém komplikace MeSH
- flekainid aplikace a dávkování krev MeSH
- intravenózní podání MeSH
- klinické protokoly MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- nemoci plodu diagnostické zobrazování farmakoterapie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- supraventrikulární tachykardie klasifikace komplikace diagnostické zobrazování farmakoterapie MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- terapie plodu metody MeSH
- ultrasonografie prenatální MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for fetal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with 1:1 atrioventricular relationship is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effectiveness of transplacental treatment protocols used in 2 centers. METHODS: Pharmacologic treatment was used in 84 fetuses. Maternal oral flecainide was the primary therapy in center 1 (n = 34) and intravenous maternal digoxin in center 2 (n = 50). SVT mechanism was classified by mechanical ventriculoatrial (VA) time intervals as short VA or long VA. Treatment success was defined as conversion to sinus rhythm (SR), or rate control, defined as >15% rate reduction. RESULTS: Short VA interval occurred in 67 fetuses (80%) and long VA in 17 (20%). Hydrops was present 28 of 84 (33%). For short VA SVT, conversion to SR was 29 of 42 (69%) for digoxin and 24 of 25 (96%) for flecainide (P = .01). For long VA SVT, conversion to SR and rate control was 4 of 8 (50%) and 0 of 8, respectively, for digoxin, and 6 of 9 (67%) and 2 of 9 (cumulative 89%) for flecainide (P = .13). In nonhydropic fetuses, digoxin was successful in 23 of 29 (79%) and flecainide in 26 of 27 (96%) (P = .10). In hydrops, digoxin was successful in 8 of 21 (38%), flecainide alone in 6 of 7 (86%, P = .07 vs digoxin), and flecainide ± amiodarone in 7 of 7 (100%) (P = .01). Intrauterine or neonatal death occurred in 9 of 21 hydropic fetuses treated with digoxin (43%), compared to 0 of 7 (P = .06) treated with flecainide. CONCLUSIONS: Flecainide was more effective than digoxin, especially when hydrops was present. No adverse fetal outcomes were attributed to flecainide.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18011047
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180404142512.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180404s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.023 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27554948
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Sridharan, Shankar $u Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: shankar.sridharan@gosh.nhs.uk.
- 245 10
- $a Flecainide versus digoxin for fetal supraventricular tachycardia: Comparison of two drug treatment protocols / $c S. Sridharan, I. Sullivan, V. Tomek, J. Wolfenden, J. Škovránek, R. Yates, J. Janoušek, TE. Dominguez, J. Marek,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for fetal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with 1:1 atrioventricular relationship is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effectiveness of transplacental treatment protocols used in 2 centers. METHODS: Pharmacologic treatment was used in 84 fetuses. Maternal oral flecainide was the primary therapy in center 1 (n = 34) and intravenous maternal digoxin in center 2 (n = 50). SVT mechanism was classified by mechanical ventriculoatrial (VA) time intervals as short VA or long VA. Treatment success was defined as conversion to sinus rhythm (SR), or rate control, defined as >15% rate reduction. RESULTS: Short VA interval occurred in 67 fetuses (80%) and long VA in 17 (20%). Hydrops was present 28 of 84 (33%). For short VA SVT, conversion to SR was 29 of 42 (69%) for digoxin and 24 of 25 (96%) for flecainide (P = .01). For long VA SVT, conversion to SR and rate control was 4 of 8 (50%) and 0 of 8, respectively, for digoxin, and 6 of 9 (67%) and 2 of 9 (cumulative 89%) for flecainide (P = .13). In nonhydropic fetuses, digoxin was successful in 23 of 29 (79%) and flecainide in 26 of 27 (96%) (P = .10). In hydrops, digoxin was successful in 8 of 21 (38%), flecainide alone in 6 of 7 (86%, P = .07 vs digoxin), and flecainide ± amiodarone in 7 of 7 (100%) (P = .01). Intrauterine or neonatal death occurred in 9 of 21 hydropic fetuses treated with digoxin (43%), compared to 0 of 7 (P = .06) treated with flecainide. CONCLUSIONS: Flecainide was more effective than digoxin, especially when hydrops was present. No adverse fetal outcomes were attributed to flecainide.
- 650 _2
- $a intravenózní podání $7 D061605
- 650 _2
- $a aplikace orální $7 D000284
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a antiarytmika $x aplikace a dávkování $x krev $7 D000889
- 650 _2
- $a klinické protokoly $7 D002985
- 650 _2
- $a digoxin $x aplikace a dávkování $x krev $7 D004077
- 650 _2
- $a echokardiografie $7 D004452
- 650 _2
- $a edém $x komplikace $7 D004487
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci plodu $x diagnostické zobrazování $x farmakoterapie $7 D005315
- 650 _2
- $a terapie plodu $x metody $7 D046128
- 650 _2
- $a flekainid $x aplikace a dávkování $x krev $7 D005424
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a supraventrikulární tachykardie $x klasifikace $x komplikace $x diagnostické zobrazování $x farmakoterapie $7 D013617
- 650 _2
- $a ultrasonografie prenatální $7 D016216
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Sullivan, Ian $u Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
- 700 1_
- $a Tomek, Viktor $u University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Wolfenden, Joanne $u Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
- 700 1_
- $a Škovránek, Jan $u University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Yates, Robert $u Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
- 700 1_
- $a Janoušek, Jan $u University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Dominguez, Troy E $u Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
- 700 1_
- $a Marek, Jan $u Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom; University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00156180 $t Heart rhythm $x 1556-3871 $g Roč. 13, č. 9 (2016), s. 1913-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27554948 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180404142552 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1288532 $s 1007859
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 13 $c 9 $d 1913-9 $i 1556-3871 $m Heart rhythm $n Heart Rhythm $x MED00156180
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180404