• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Flecainide versus digoxin for fetal supraventricular tachycardia: Comparison of two drug treatment protocols

S. Sridharan, I. Sullivan, V. Tomek, J. Wolfenden, J. Škovránek, R. Yates, J. Janoušek, TE. Dominguez, J. Marek,

. 2016 ; 13 (9) : 1913-9.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18011047

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for fetal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with 1:1 atrioventricular relationship is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effectiveness of transplacental treatment protocols used in 2 centers. METHODS: Pharmacologic treatment was used in 84 fetuses. Maternal oral flecainide was the primary therapy in center 1 (n = 34) and intravenous maternal digoxin in center 2 (n = 50). SVT mechanism was classified by mechanical ventriculoatrial (VA) time intervals as short VA or long VA. Treatment success was defined as conversion to sinus rhythm (SR), or rate control, defined as >15% rate reduction. RESULTS: Short VA interval occurred in 67 fetuses (80%) and long VA in 17 (20%). Hydrops was present 28 of 84 (33%). For short VA SVT, conversion to SR was 29 of 42 (69%) for digoxin and 24 of 25 (96%) for flecainide (P = .01). For long VA SVT, conversion to SR and rate control was 4 of 8 (50%) and 0 of 8, respectively, for digoxin, and 6 of 9 (67%) and 2 of 9 (cumulative 89%) for flecainide (P = .13). In nonhydropic fetuses, digoxin was successful in 23 of 29 (79%) and flecainide in 26 of 27 (96%) (P = .10). In hydrops, digoxin was successful in 8 of 21 (38%), flecainide alone in 6 of 7 (86%, P = .07 vs digoxin), and flecainide ± amiodarone in 7 of 7 (100%) (P = .01). Intrauterine or neonatal death occurred in 9 of 21 hydropic fetuses treated with digoxin (43%), compared to 0 of 7 (P = .06) treated with flecainide. CONCLUSIONS: Flecainide was more effective than digoxin, especially when hydrops was present. No adverse fetal outcomes were attributed to flecainide.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18011047
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180404142512.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.023 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27554948
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Sridharan, Shankar $u Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: shankar.sridharan@gosh.nhs.uk.
245    10
$a Flecainide versus digoxin for fetal supraventricular tachycardia: Comparison of two drug treatment protocols / $c S. Sridharan, I. Sullivan, V. Tomek, J. Wolfenden, J. Škovránek, R. Yates, J. Janoušek, TE. Dominguez, J. Marek,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for fetal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with 1:1 atrioventricular relationship is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effectiveness of transplacental treatment protocols used in 2 centers. METHODS: Pharmacologic treatment was used in 84 fetuses. Maternal oral flecainide was the primary therapy in center 1 (n = 34) and intravenous maternal digoxin in center 2 (n = 50). SVT mechanism was classified by mechanical ventriculoatrial (VA) time intervals as short VA or long VA. Treatment success was defined as conversion to sinus rhythm (SR), or rate control, defined as >15% rate reduction. RESULTS: Short VA interval occurred in 67 fetuses (80%) and long VA in 17 (20%). Hydrops was present 28 of 84 (33%). For short VA SVT, conversion to SR was 29 of 42 (69%) for digoxin and 24 of 25 (96%) for flecainide (P = .01). For long VA SVT, conversion to SR and rate control was 4 of 8 (50%) and 0 of 8, respectively, for digoxin, and 6 of 9 (67%) and 2 of 9 (cumulative 89%) for flecainide (P = .13). In nonhydropic fetuses, digoxin was successful in 23 of 29 (79%) and flecainide in 26 of 27 (96%) (P = .10). In hydrops, digoxin was successful in 8 of 21 (38%), flecainide alone in 6 of 7 (86%, P = .07 vs digoxin), and flecainide ± amiodarone in 7 of 7 (100%) (P = .01). Intrauterine or neonatal death occurred in 9 of 21 hydropic fetuses treated with digoxin (43%), compared to 0 of 7 (P = .06) treated with flecainide. CONCLUSIONS: Flecainide was more effective than digoxin, especially when hydrops was present. No adverse fetal outcomes were attributed to flecainide.
650    _2
$a intravenózní podání $7 D061605
650    _2
$a aplikace orální $7 D000284
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a antiarytmika $x aplikace a dávkování $x krev $7 D000889
650    _2
$a klinické protokoly $7 D002985
650    _2
$a digoxin $x aplikace a dávkování $x krev $7 D004077
650    _2
$a echokardiografie $7 D004452
650    _2
$a edém $x komplikace $7 D004487
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a nemoci plodu $x diagnostické zobrazování $x farmakoterapie $7 D005315
650    _2
$a terapie plodu $x metody $7 D046128
650    _2
$a flekainid $x aplikace a dávkování $x krev $7 D005424
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a supraventrikulární tachykardie $x klasifikace $x komplikace $x diagnostické zobrazování $x farmakoterapie $7 D013617
650    _2
$a ultrasonografie prenatální $7 D016216
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Sullivan, Ian $u Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Tomek, Viktor $u University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Wolfenden, Joanne $u Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Škovránek, Jan $u University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Yates, Robert $u Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Janoušek, Jan $u University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Dominguez, Troy E $u Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Marek, Jan $u Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom; University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00156180 $t Heart rhythm $x 1556-3871 $g Roč. 13, č. 9 (2016), s. 1913-9
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27554948 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180404142552 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288532 $s 1007859
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 13 $c 9 $d 1913-9 $i 1556-3871 $m Heart rhythm $n Heart Rhythm $x MED00156180
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...