• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Using historical ecology to reassess the conservation status of coniferous forests in Central Europe

P. Szabó, P. Kuneš, H. Svobodová-Svitavská, MG. Švarcová, L. Křížová, S. Suchánková, J. Müllerová, R. Hédl,

. 2017 ; 31 (1) : 150-160. [pub] 20160913

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18011210

Forests cover approximately one-third of Central Europe. Oak (Quercus) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica) are considered the natural dominants at low and middle elevations, respectively. Many coniferous forests (especially of Picea abies) occur primarily at midelevations, but these are thought to have resulted from forestry plantations planted over the past 200 years. Nature conservation and forestry policy seek to promote broadleaved trees over conifers. However, there are discrepancies between conservation guidelines (included in Natura 2000) and historical and palaeoecological data with regard to the distribution of conifers. Our aim was to bring new evidence to the debate on the conservation of conifers versus broadleaved trees at midelevations in Central Europe. We created a vegetation and land-cover model based on pollen data for a highland area of 11,300 km2in the Czech Republic and assessed tree species composition in the forests before the onset of modern forestry based on 18th-century archival sources. Conifers dominated the study region throughout the entire Holocene (approximately 40-60% of the area). Broadleaved trees were present in a much smaller area than envisaged by current ideas of natural vegetation. Rather than casting doubt on the principles of Central European nature conservation in general, our results highlight the necessity of detailed regional investigations and the importance of historical data in challenging established notions on the natural distribution of tree species.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18011210
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180404142632.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/cobi.12763 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27198624
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Szabó, Péter $u Department of Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lidická 25/27, Brno, CZ-60200, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Using historical ecology to reassess the conservation status of coniferous forests in Central Europe / $c P. Szabó, P. Kuneš, H. Svobodová-Svitavská, MG. Švarcová, L. Křížová, S. Suchánková, J. Müllerová, R. Hédl,
520    9_
$a Forests cover approximately one-third of Central Europe. Oak (Quercus) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica) are considered the natural dominants at low and middle elevations, respectively. Many coniferous forests (especially of Picea abies) occur primarily at midelevations, but these are thought to have resulted from forestry plantations planted over the past 200 years. Nature conservation and forestry policy seek to promote broadleaved trees over conifers. However, there are discrepancies between conservation guidelines (included in Natura 2000) and historical and palaeoecological data with regard to the distribution of conifers. Our aim was to bring new evidence to the debate on the conservation of conifers versus broadleaved trees at midelevations in Central Europe. We created a vegetation and land-cover model based on pollen data for a highland area of 11,300 km2in the Czech Republic and assessed tree species composition in the forests before the onset of modern forestry based on 18th-century archival sources. Conifers dominated the study region throughout the entire Holocene (approximately 40-60% of the area). Broadleaved trees were present in a much smaller area than envisaged by current ideas of natural vegetation. Rather than casting doubt on the principles of Central European nature conservation in general, our results highlight the necessity of detailed regional investigations and the importance of historical data in challenging established notions on the natural distribution of tree species.
650    12
$a zachování přírodních zdrojů $7 D003247
650    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
650    _2
$a lesnictví $7 D016468
650    12
$a lesy $7 D065928
650    _2
$a stromy $7 D014197
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kuneš, Petr $u Department of Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lidická 25/27, Brno, CZ-60200, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, Praha, CZ-12801, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Svobodová-Svitavská, Helena $u Department of Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lidická 25/27, Brno, CZ-60200, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Švarcová, Markéta Gabriela $u Department of Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lidická 25/27, Brno, CZ-60200, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, Praha, CZ-12801, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Křížová, Lucie $u Department of Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lidická 25/27, Brno, CZ-60200, Czech Republic. Moravský zemský archiv, Palachovo náměstí 1, Brno, CZ-62500, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Suchánková, Silvie $u Department of Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lidická 25/27, Brno, CZ-60200, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Müllerová, Jana $u Department of GIS and Remote Sensing, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, CZ-25243, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hédl, Radim $u Department of Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lidická 25/27, Brno, CZ-60200, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc, Šlechtitelů 27, Olomouc, CZ-78371, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001224 $t Conservation biology the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology $x 1523-1739 $g Roč. 31, č. 1 (2017), s. 150-160
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27198624 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180404142711 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288695 $s 1008022
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 31 $c 1 $d 150-160 $e 20160913 $i 1523-1739 $m Conservation biology $n Conserv. biol. $x MED00001224
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...