-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify adiposity in women
A. Gába, M. Přidalová,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1997-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
26669574
DOI
10.1038/ejcn.2015.211
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adipozita MeSH
- chybná diagnóza statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- elektrická impedance MeSH
- index tělesné hmotnosti * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- obezita diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- prevalence MeSH
- referenční hodnoty MeSH
- ROC křivka MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika epidemiologie MeSH
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of body mass index (BMI) and to detect the optimal BMI cutoff points to define adiposity in women of various ages. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A total of 2409 women participated. Fat mass was measured using a multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. The diagnostic performance of BMI to identify adiposity was evaluated using a fat mass percentage cutoff point of ⩾35%. RESULTS: Although 40% of women were overfat, the BMI-based obesity prevalence was 21%. In the total sample, BMI had low overall performance, which resulted in a sensitivity of 51.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 48.7-55.2%) and a specificity of 99.2% (95% CI: 98.7-99.6%). BMI failed to identify overfat women with intermediate BMI ranges. An analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves of all of the subjects demonstrated that optimal cutoff point corresponded to a BMI value of 26.4 kg/m(2). The diagnostic performance of BMI did not differ as age increased. CONCLUSIONS: BMI has a high specificity but a low sensitivity to detect adiposity, and it fails to identify nearly half of women with excess fat mass. We provide evidence that a commonly used BMI cutoff value to diagnose obesity is too high among women.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18011322
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180418125158.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180404s2016 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/ejcn.2015.211 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26669574
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Gába, A $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Department of Natural Sciences in Kinanthropology, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify adiposity in women / $c A. Gába, M. Přidalová,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of body mass index (BMI) and to detect the optimal BMI cutoff points to define adiposity in women of various ages. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A total of 2409 women participated. Fat mass was measured using a multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. The diagnostic performance of BMI to identify adiposity was evaluated using a fat mass percentage cutoff point of ⩾35%. RESULTS: Although 40% of women were overfat, the BMI-based obesity prevalence was 21%. In the total sample, BMI had low overall performance, which resulted in a sensitivity of 51.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 48.7-55.2%) and a specificity of 99.2% (95% CI: 98.7-99.6%). BMI failed to identify overfat women with intermediate BMI ranges. An analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves of all of the subjects demonstrated that optimal cutoff point corresponded to a BMI value of 26.4 kg/m(2). The diagnostic performance of BMI did not differ as age increased. CONCLUSIONS: BMI has a high specificity but a low sensitivity to detect adiposity, and it fails to identify nearly half of women with excess fat mass. We provide evidence that a commonly used BMI cutoff value to diagnose obesity is too high among women.
- 650 _2
- $a adipozita $7 D050154
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 12
- $a index tělesné hmotnosti $7 D015992
- 650 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 650 _2
- $a chybná diagnóza $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D003951
- 650 _2
- $a elektrická impedance $7 D017097
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a obezita $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D009765
- 650 _2
- $a prevalence $7 D015995
- 650 _2
- $a ROC křivka $7 D012372
- 650 _2
- $a referenční hodnoty $7 D012016
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Přidalová, M $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Department of Natural Sciences in Kinanthropology, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007492 $t European journal of clinical nutrition $x 1476-5640 $g Roč. 70, č. 8 (2016), s. 898-903
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26669574 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180418125258 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1288807 $s 1008134
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 70 $c 8 $d 898-903 $e 20151216 $i 1476-5640 $m European journal of clinical nutrition $n Eur J Clin Nutr $x MED00007492
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180404