Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Colchicine application significantly affects plant performance in the second generation of synthetic polyploids and its effects vary between populations

Z. Münzbergová,

. 2017 ; 120 (2) : 329-339.

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18016534
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK PubMed Central od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library od 1993-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

Background and Aims: Understanding the direct consequences of polyploidization is necessary for assessing the evolutionary significance of this mode of speciation. Previous studies have not studied the degree of between-population variation that occurs due to these effects. Although it is assumed that the effects of the substances that create synthetic polyploids disappear in second-generation synthetic polyploids, this has not been tested. Methods: The direct consequences of polyploidization were assessed and separated from the effects of subsequent evolution in Vicia cracca , a naturally occurring species with diploid and autotetraploid cytotypes. Synthetic tetraploids were created from diploids of four mixed-ploidy populations. Performance of natural diploids and tetraploids was compared with that of synthetic tetraploids. Diploid offspring of the synthetic tetraploid mothers were also included in the comparison. In this way, the effects of colchicine application in the maternal generation on offspring performance could be compared independently of the effects of polyploidization. Key Results: The sizes of seeds and stomata were primarily affected by cytotype, while plant performance differed between natural and synthetic polyploids. Most performance traits were also determined by colchicine application to the mothers, and most of these results were largely population specific. Conclusions: Because the consequences of colchicine application are still apparent in the second generation of the plants, at least the third-generation polyploids should be considered in future comparisons. The specificities of the colchicine-treated plants may also be caused by strong selection pressures during the creation of synthetic polyploids. This could be tested by comparing the initial sizes of plants that survived the colchicine treatments with those of plants that did not. High variation between populations also suggests that different polyploids follow different evolutionary trajectories, and this should be considered when studying the effects of polyploidization.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18016534
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180515103714.0
007      
ta
008      
180515s2017 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/aob/mcx070 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28633349
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Münzbergová, Zuzana $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Colchicine application significantly affects plant performance in the second generation of synthetic polyploids and its effects vary between populations / $c Z. Münzbergová,
520    9_
$a Background and Aims: Understanding the direct consequences of polyploidization is necessary for assessing the evolutionary significance of this mode of speciation. Previous studies have not studied the degree of between-population variation that occurs due to these effects. Although it is assumed that the effects of the substances that create synthetic polyploids disappear in second-generation synthetic polyploids, this has not been tested. Methods: The direct consequences of polyploidization were assessed and separated from the effects of subsequent evolution in Vicia cracca , a naturally occurring species with diploid and autotetraploid cytotypes. Synthetic tetraploids were created from diploids of four mixed-ploidy populations. Performance of natural diploids and tetraploids was compared with that of synthetic tetraploids. Diploid offspring of the synthetic tetraploid mothers were also included in the comparison. In this way, the effects of colchicine application in the maternal generation on offspring performance could be compared independently of the effects of polyploidization. Key Results: The sizes of seeds and stomata were primarily affected by cytotype, while plant performance differed between natural and synthetic polyploids. Most performance traits were also determined by colchicine application to the mothers, and most of these results were largely population specific. Conclusions: Because the consequences of colchicine application are still apparent in the second generation of the plants, at least the third-generation polyploids should be considered in future comparisons. The specificities of the colchicine-treated plants may also be caused by strong selection pressures during the creation of synthetic polyploids. This could be tested by comparing the initial sizes of plants that survived the colchicine treatments with those of plants that did not. High variation between populations also suggests that different polyploids follow different evolutionary trajectories, and this should be considered when studying the effects of polyploidization.
650    _2
$a kolchicin $x farmakologie $7 D003078
650    _2
$a diploidie $7 D004171
650    _2
$a molekulární evoluce $7 D019143
650    12
$a polyploidie $7 D011123
650    _2
$a tetraploidie $7 D057891
650    _2
$a vikev $x účinky léků $x genetika $7 D031306
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
773    0_
$w MED00000419 $t Annals of botany $x 1095-8290 $g Roč. 120, č. 2 (2017), s. 329-339
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28633349 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180515 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180515103848 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1300158 $s 1013374
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 120 $c 2 $d 329-339 $i 1095-8290 $m Annals of botany $n Ann. bot. (Print) $x MED00000419
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180515

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...