-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Colchicine application significantly affects plant performance in the second generation of synthetic polyploids and its effects vary between populations
Z. Münzbergová,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
PubMed Central
od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central
od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1993-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
28633349
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcx070
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- diploidie MeSH
- kolchicin farmakologie MeSH
- molekulární evoluce MeSH
- polyploidie * MeSH
- tetraploidie MeSH
- vikev účinky léků genetika MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Background and Aims: Understanding the direct consequences of polyploidization is necessary for assessing the evolutionary significance of this mode of speciation. Previous studies have not studied the degree of between-population variation that occurs due to these effects. Although it is assumed that the effects of the substances that create synthetic polyploids disappear in second-generation synthetic polyploids, this has not been tested. Methods: The direct consequences of polyploidization were assessed and separated from the effects of subsequent evolution in Vicia cracca , a naturally occurring species with diploid and autotetraploid cytotypes. Synthetic tetraploids were created from diploids of four mixed-ploidy populations. Performance of natural diploids and tetraploids was compared with that of synthetic tetraploids. Diploid offspring of the synthetic tetraploid mothers were also included in the comparison. In this way, the effects of colchicine application in the maternal generation on offspring performance could be compared independently of the effects of polyploidization. Key Results: The sizes of seeds and stomata were primarily affected by cytotype, while plant performance differed between natural and synthetic polyploids. Most performance traits were also determined by colchicine application to the mothers, and most of these results were largely population specific. Conclusions: Because the consequences of colchicine application are still apparent in the second generation of the plants, at least the third-generation polyploids should be considered in future comparisons. The specificities of the colchicine-treated plants may also be caused by strong selection pressures during the creation of synthetic polyploids. This could be tested by comparing the initial sizes of plants that survived the colchicine treatments with those of plants that did not. High variation between populations also suggests that different polyploids follow different evolutionary trajectories, and this should be considered when studying the effects of polyploidization.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18016534
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180515103714.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180515s2017 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/aob/mcx070 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28633349
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Münzbergová, Zuzana $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Colchicine application significantly affects plant performance in the second generation of synthetic polyploids and its effects vary between populations / $c Z. Münzbergová,
- 520 9_
- $a Background and Aims: Understanding the direct consequences of polyploidization is necessary for assessing the evolutionary significance of this mode of speciation. Previous studies have not studied the degree of between-population variation that occurs due to these effects. Although it is assumed that the effects of the substances that create synthetic polyploids disappear in second-generation synthetic polyploids, this has not been tested. Methods: The direct consequences of polyploidization were assessed and separated from the effects of subsequent evolution in Vicia cracca , a naturally occurring species with diploid and autotetraploid cytotypes. Synthetic tetraploids were created from diploids of four mixed-ploidy populations. Performance of natural diploids and tetraploids was compared with that of synthetic tetraploids. Diploid offspring of the synthetic tetraploid mothers were also included in the comparison. In this way, the effects of colchicine application in the maternal generation on offspring performance could be compared independently of the effects of polyploidization. Key Results: The sizes of seeds and stomata were primarily affected by cytotype, while plant performance differed between natural and synthetic polyploids. Most performance traits were also determined by colchicine application to the mothers, and most of these results were largely population specific. Conclusions: Because the consequences of colchicine application are still apparent in the second generation of the plants, at least the third-generation polyploids should be considered in future comparisons. The specificities of the colchicine-treated plants may also be caused by strong selection pressures during the creation of synthetic polyploids. This could be tested by comparing the initial sizes of plants that survived the colchicine treatments with those of plants that did not. High variation between populations also suggests that different polyploids follow different evolutionary trajectories, and this should be considered when studying the effects of polyploidization.
- 650 _2
- $a kolchicin $x farmakologie $7 D003078
- 650 _2
- $a diploidie $7 D004171
- 650 _2
- $a molekulární evoluce $7 D019143
- 650 12
- $a polyploidie $7 D011123
- 650 _2
- $a tetraploidie $7 D057891
- 650 _2
- $a vikev $x účinky léků $x genetika $7 D031306
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000419 $t Annals of botany $x 1095-8290 $g Roč. 120, č. 2 (2017), s. 329-339
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28633349 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180515 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180515103848 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1300158 $s 1013374
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 120 $c 2 $d 329-339 $i 1095-8290 $m Annals of botany $n Ann. bot. (Print) $x MED00000419
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180515