Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of targeted proteomics approaches for detecting and quantifying proteins derived from human cancer tissues

J. Faktor, R. Sucha, V. Paralova, Y. Liu, P. Bouchal,

. 2017 ; 17 (5) : . [pub] 20170222

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18016865

Targeted mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches enable the simultaneous and reproducible quantification of multiple protein analytes across numerous conditions in biology and clinical studies. These approaches involve e.g. selected reaction monitoring (SRM) typically conducted on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, its high-resolution variant named pseudo-SRM (p-SRM), carried out in a quadrupole coupled with an TOF analyzer (qTOF), and "sequential window acquisition of all theoretical spectra" (SWATH). Here we compared these methods in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), coefficient of variance (CV), fold change (FC), limit of detection and quantitation (LOD, LOQ). We have shown the highest S/N for p-SRM mode, followed by SRM and SWATH, demonstrating a trade-off between sensitivity and level of multiplexing for SRM, p-SRM, and SWATH. SRM was more sensitive than p-SRM based on determining their LOD and LOQ. Although SWATH has the worst S/N, it enables peptide multiplexing with post-acquisition definition of the targets, leading to better proteome coverage. FC between breast tumors of different clinical-pathological characteristics were highly correlated (R2 >0.97) across three methods and consistent with the previous study on 96 tumor tissues. Our technical note presented here, therefore, confirmed that outputs of all the three methods were biologically relevant and highly applicable to cancer research.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18016865
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190204090553.0
007      
ta
008      
180515s2017 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/pmic.201600323 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27966270
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Faktor, Jakub $u Regional Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Comparison of targeted proteomics approaches for detecting and quantifying proteins derived from human cancer tissues / $c J. Faktor, R. Sucha, V. Paralova, Y. Liu, P. Bouchal,
520    9_
$a Targeted mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches enable the simultaneous and reproducible quantification of multiple protein analytes across numerous conditions in biology and clinical studies. These approaches involve e.g. selected reaction monitoring (SRM) typically conducted on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, its high-resolution variant named pseudo-SRM (p-SRM), carried out in a quadrupole coupled with an TOF analyzer (qTOF), and "sequential window acquisition of all theoretical spectra" (SWATH). Here we compared these methods in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), coefficient of variance (CV), fold change (FC), limit of detection and quantitation (LOD, LOQ). We have shown the highest S/N for p-SRM mode, followed by SRM and SWATH, demonstrating a trade-off between sensitivity and level of multiplexing for SRM, p-SRM, and SWATH. SRM was more sensitive than p-SRM based on determining their LOD and LOQ. Although SWATH has the worst S/N, it enables peptide multiplexing with post-acquisition definition of the targets, leading to better proteome coverage. FC between breast tumors of different clinical-pathological characteristics were highly correlated (R2 >0.97) across three methods and consistent with the previous study on 96 tumor tissues. Our technical note presented here, therefore, confirmed that outputs of all the three methods were biologically relevant and highly applicable to cancer research.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a limita detekce $7 D057230
650    _2
$a hmotnostní spektrometrie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D013058
650    _2
$a nádory $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D009369
650    _2
$a proteiny $x analýza $7 D011506
650    _2
$a proteomika $x metody $7 D040901
650    _2
$a poměr signál - šum $7 D059629
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Sucha, Rita $u Laboratory of Applied Proteome Analyses and Research Center PIGMOD, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Libechov, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Paralova, Vendula $u Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Liu, Yansheng $u Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Bouchal, Pavel, $u Regional Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. $d 1975- $7 xx0128495
773    0_
$w MED00007044 $t Proteomics $x 1615-9861 $g Roč. 17, č. 5 (2017)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27966270 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180515 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190204090830 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1300489 $s 1013705
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 17 $c 5 $e 20170222 $i 1615-9861 $m Proteomics $n Proteomics $x MED00007044
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180515

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace