• Something wrong with this record ?

Expression of c-Fos in rat auditory and limbic systems following 22-kHz calls

L. Ouda, M. Jílek, J. Syka,

. 2016 ; 308 (-) : 196-204. [pub] 20160419

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

In the present study, adult Long-Evans rats were exposed either to natural conspecific aversive 22-kHz vocalizations or to artificial call-like stimuli with comparable frequency-temporal features, followed by c-Fos immunohistochemistry. The natural 22-kHz vocalizations was either played from a recording or produced by a foot-shocked animal located nearby (live vocalizations). In comparison with controls (non-exposed animals), c-Fos immunoreactivity was significantly increased in the inferior colliculus (IC), auditory cortex (AC), periaqueductal grey (PAG), basolateral amygdala (BA), and hippocampus (Hip) of rats exposed to either live or recorded 22-kHz natural vocalizations. Exposure to live natural vocalizations of the foot-shocked animal resulted in a similar pattern of c-Fos activity, as did exposure to the playback of the natural vocalizations. In contrast to this, foot-shocked rats (emitting the 22-kHz vocalizations) had the c-Fos positivity increased markedly in the PAG and only slightly in the AC. The expression of c-Fos also increased in the IC, AC, and in the PAG in animals exposed to the artificial call-like stimuli, when compared to controls; however, the increase was much less pronounced. In this case, c-Fos expression was not increased in the hippocampus or basolateral amygdala. Interestingly, almost no c-Fos expression was found in the medial nucleus of the geniculate body in any of the experimental groups. These findings suggest that differences exist between the processing of important natural conspecific vocalizations and artificial call-like stimuli with similar frequency-temporal features, and moreover they suggest the specific role of individual brain structures in the processing of such calls.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18017294
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180515103122.0
007      
ta
008      
180515s2016 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.04.030 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27102341
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Ouda, Ladislav $u Department of Auditory Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: ouda@biomed.cas.cz.
245    10
$a Expression of c-Fos in rat auditory and limbic systems following 22-kHz calls / $c L. Ouda, M. Jílek, J. Syka,
520    9_
$a In the present study, adult Long-Evans rats were exposed either to natural conspecific aversive 22-kHz vocalizations or to artificial call-like stimuli with comparable frequency-temporal features, followed by c-Fos immunohistochemistry. The natural 22-kHz vocalizations was either played from a recording or produced by a foot-shocked animal located nearby (live vocalizations). In comparison with controls (non-exposed animals), c-Fos immunoreactivity was significantly increased in the inferior colliculus (IC), auditory cortex (AC), periaqueductal grey (PAG), basolateral amygdala (BA), and hippocampus (Hip) of rats exposed to either live or recorded 22-kHz natural vocalizations. Exposure to live natural vocalizations of the foot-shocked animal resulted in a similar pattern of c-Fos activity, as did exposure to the playback of the natural vocalizations. In contrast to this, foot-shocked rats (emitting the 22-kHz vocalizations) had the c-Fos positivity increased markedly in the PAG and only slightly in the AC. The expression of c-Fos also increased in the IC, AC, and in the PAG in animals exposed to the artificial call-like stimuli, when compared to controls; however, the increase was much less pronounced. In this case, c-Fos expression was not increased in the hippocampus or basolateral amygdala. Interestingly, almost no c-Fos expression was found in the medial nucleus of the geniculate body in any of the experimental groups. These findings suggest that differences exist between the processing of important natural conspecific vocalizations and artificial call-like stimuli with similar frequency-temporal features, and moreover they suggest the specific role of individual brain structures in the processing of such calls.
650    _2
$a akustická stimulace $7 D000161
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a sluchové korové centrum $x metabolismus $x účinky záření $7 D001303
650    _2
$a mapování mozku $7 D001931
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a limbický systém $x metabolismus $x účinky záření $7 D008032
650    _2
$a protoonkogenní proteiny c-fos $x metabolismus $7 D016760
650    _2
$a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
650    _2
$a potkani Long-Evans $7 D020318
650    12
$a vokalizace zvířat $x fyziologie $7 D014828
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Jílek, Milan $u Department of Auditory Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Syka, Josef $u Department of Auditory Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00000660 $t Behavioural brain research $x 1872-7549 $g Roč. 308, č. - (2016), s. 196-204
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27102341 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180515 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180515103255 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1300918 $s 1014134
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 308 $c - $d 196-204 $e 20160419 $i 1872-7549 $m Behavioural brain research $n Behav Brain Res $x MED00000660
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180515

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...