-
Something wrong with this record ?
Expression of c-Fos in rat auditory and limbic systems following 22-kHz calls
L. Ouda, M. Jílek, J. Syka,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Acoustic Stimulation MeSH
- Rats MeSH
- Limbic System metabolism radiation effects MeSH
- Brain Mapping MeSH
- Rats, Long-Evans MeSH
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos metabolism MeSH
- Auditory Cortex metabolism radiation effects MeSH
- Vocalization, Animal * physiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Rats MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
In the present study, adult Long-Evans rats were exposed either to natural conspecific aversive 22-kHz vocalizations or to artificial call-like stimuli with comparable frequency-temporal features, followed by c-Fos immunohistochemistry. The natural 22-kHz vocalizations was either played from a recording or produced by a foot-shocked animal located nearby (live vocalizations). In comparison with controls (non-exposed animals), c-Fos immunoreactivity was significantly increased in the inferior colliculus (IC), auditory cortex (AC), periaqueductal grey (PAG), basolateral amygdala (BA), and hippocampus (Hip) of rats exposed to either live or recorded 22-kHz natural vocalizations. Exposure to live natural vocalizations of the foot-shocked animal resulted in a similar pattern of c-Fos activity, as did exposure to the playback of the natural vocalizations. In contrast to this, foot-shocked rats (emitting the 22-kHz vocalizations) had the c-Fos positivity increased markedly in the PAG and only slightly in the AC. The expression of c-Fos also increased in the IC, AC, and in the PAG in animals exposed to the artificial call-like stimuli, when compared to controls; however, the increase was much less pronounced. In this case, c-Fos expression was not increased in the hippocampus or basolateral amygdala. Interestingly, almost no c-Fos expression was found in the medial nucleus of the geniculate body in any of the experimental groups. These findings suggest that differences exist between the processing of important natural conspecific vocalizations and artificial call-like stimuli with similar frequency-temporal features, and moreover they suggest the specific role of individual brain structures in the processing of such calls.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18017294
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180515103122.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180515s2016 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.04.030 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27102341
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Ouda, Ladislav $u Department of Auditory Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: ouda@biomed.cas.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Expression of c-Fos in rat auditory and limbic systems following 22-kHz calls / $c L. Ouda, M. Jílek, J. Syka,
- 520 9_
- $a In the present study, adult Long-Evans rats were exposed either to natural conspecific aversive 22-kHz vocalizations or to artificial call-like stimuli with comparable frequency-temporal features, followed by c-Fos immunohistochemistry. The natural 22-kHz vocalizations was either played from a recording or produced by a foot-shocked animal located nearby (live vocalizations). In comparison with controls (non-exposed animals), c-Fos immunoreactivity was significantly increased in the inferior colliculus (IC), auditory cortex (AC), periaqueductal grey (PAG), basolateral amygdala (BA), and hippocampus (Hip) of rats exposed to either live or recorded 22-kHz natural vocalizations. Exposure to live natural vocalizations of the foot-shocked animal resulted in a similar pattern of c-Fos activity, as did exposure to the playback of the natural vocalizations. In contrast to this, foot-shocked rats (emitting the 22-kHz vocalizations) had the c-Fos positivity increased markedly in the PAG and only slightly in the AC. The expression of c-Fos also increased in the IC, AC, and in the PAG in animals exposed to the artificial call-like stimuli, when compared to controls; however, the increase was much less pronounced. In this case, c-Fos expression was not increased in the hippocampus or basolateral amygdala. Interestingly, almost no c-Fos expression was found in the medial nucleus of the geniculate body in any of the experimental groups. These findings suggest that differences exist between the processing of important natural conspecific vocalizations and artificial call-like stimuli with similar frequency-temporal features, and moreover they suggest the specific role of individual brain structures in the processing of such calls.
- 650 _2
- $a akustická stimulace $7 D000161
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a sluchové korové centrum $x metabolismus $x účinky záření $7 D001303
- 650 _2
- $a mapování mozku $7 D001931
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a limbický systém $x metabolismus $x účinky záření $7 D008032
- 650 _2
- $a protoonkogenní proteiny c-fos $x metabolismus $7 D016760
- 650 _2
- $a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
- 650 _2
- $a potkani Long-Evans $7 D020318
- 650 12
- $a vokalizace zvířat $x fyziologie $7 D014828
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Jílek, Milan $u Department of Auditory Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Syka, Josef $u Department of Auditory Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000660 $t Behavioural brain research $x 1872-7549 $g Roč. 308, č. - (2016), s. 196-204
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27102341 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180515 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180515103255 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1300918 $s 1014134
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 308 $c - $d 196-204 $e 20160419 $i 1872-7549 $m Behavioural brain research $n Behav Brain Res $x MED00000660
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180515