-
Something wrong with this record ?
Structural and mechanical implications of PMMA implant shape and interface geometry in cranioplasty--A finite element study
A. Ridwan-Pramana, P. Marcián, L. Borák, N. Narra, T. Forouzanfar, J. Wolff,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Finite Element Analysis MeSH
- Dental Stress Analysis MeSH
- Skull * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Stress, Mechanical MeSH
- Polymethyl Methacrylate MeSH
- Prostheses and Implants * MeSH
- Bone-Implant Interface * MeSH
- Dental Implants * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
This computational study investigates the effect of shape (defect contour curvature) and bone-implant interface (osteotomy angle) on the stress distribution within PMMA skull implants. Using finite element methodology, 15 configurations--combinations of simplified synthetic geometric shapes (circular, square, triangular, irregular) and interface angulations--were simulated under 50N static loads. Furthermore, the implant fixation devices were modelled and analysed in detail. Negative osteotomy configurations demonstrated the largest stresses in the implant (275 MPa), fixation devices (1258 MPa) and bone strains (0.04). The circular implant with zero and positive osteotomy performed well with maximum observed magnitudes of--implant stress (1.2 MPa and 1.2 MPa), fixation device stress (11.2 MPa and 2.2 MPa), bone strain (0.218e-3 and 0.750e-4). The results suggest that the preparation of defect sites is a critical procedure. Of the greatest importance is the angle at which the edges of the defect are sawed. If under an external load, the implant has no support from the interface and the stresses are transferred to the fixation devices. This can endanger their material integrity and lead to unphysiological strains in the adjacent bone, potentially compromising the bone morphology required for anchoring. These factors can ultimately weaken the stability of the entire implant assembly.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18017379
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180521140855.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180515s2016 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.014 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26646634
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Ridwan-Pramana, Angela $u Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Center for Special Care in Dentistry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- 245 10
- $a Structural and mechanical implications of PMMA implant shape and interface geometry in cranioplasty--A finite element study / $c A. Ridwan-Pramana, P. Marcián, L. Borák, N. Narra, T. Forouzanfar, J. Wolff,
- 520 9_
- $a This computational study investigates the effect of shape (defect contour curvature) and bone-implant interface (osteotomy angle) on the stress distribution within PMMA skull implants. Using finite element methodology, 15 configurations--combinations of simplified synthetic geometric shapes (circular, square, triangular, irregular) and interface angulations--were simulated under 50N static loads. Furthermore, the implant fixation devices were modelled and analysed in detail. Negative osteotomy configurations demonstrated the largest stresses in the implant (275 MPa), fixation devices (1258 MPa) and bone strains (0.04). The circular implant with zero and positive osteotomy performed well with maximum observed magnitudes of--implant stress (1.2 MPa and 1.2 MPa), fixation device stress (11.2 MPa and 2.2 MPa), bone strain (0.218e-3 and 0.750e-4). The results suggest that the preparation of defect sites is a critical procedure. Of the greatest importance is the angle at which the edges of the defect are sawed. If under an external load, the implant has no support from the interface and the stresses are transferred to the fixation devices. This can endanger their material integrity and lead to unphysiological strains in the adjacent bone, potentially compromising the bone morphology required for anchoring. These factors can ultimately weaken the stability of the entire implant assembly.
- 650 12
- $a rozhraní kost/implantát $7 D000069343
- 650 12
- $a zubní implantáty $7 D015921
- 650 _2
- $a analýza zatížení zubů $7 D003799
- 650 _2
- $a analýza metodou konečných prvků $7 D020342
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a polymethylmethakrylát $7 D019904
- 650 12
- $a protézy a implantáty $7 D019736
- 650 12
- $a lebka $7 D012886
- 650 _2
- $a mechanický stres $7 D013314
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Marcián, Petr $u Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Borák, Libor $u Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Narra, Nathaniel $u Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, BioMediTech, Finland. Electronic address: nathaniel.narragirish@tut.fi.
- 700 1_
- $a Forouzanfar, Tim $u Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Wolff, Jan $u Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002623 $t Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery $x 1878-4119 $g Roč. 44, č. 1 (2016), s. 34-44
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26646634 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180515 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180521141037 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1301003 $s 1014219
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 44 $c 1 $d 34-44 $e 20151023 $i 1878-4119 $m Journal of cranio-maxillofacial surgery $n J Craniomaxillofac Surg $x MED00002623
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180515