• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Rocuronium versus suxamethonium for rapid sequence induction of general anaesthesia for caesarean section: influence on neonatal outcomes

M. Kosinova, P. Stourac, M. Adamus, D. Seidlova, T. Pavlik, P. Janku, I. Krikava, Z. Mrozek, M. Prochazka, J. Klucka, R. Stoudek, I. Bartikova, H. Harazim, H. Robotkova, K. Hejduk, Z. Hodicka, M. Kirchnerova, J. Francakova, LO. Pyszkova, J....

. 2017 ; 32 (-) : 4-10. [pub] 20170510

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18024949

BACKGROUND: In a previous study we compared rocuronium and suxamethonium for rapid-sequence induction of general anaesthesia for caesarean section and found no difference in maternal outcome. There was however, a significant difference in Apgar scores. As this was a secondary outcome, we extended the study to explore this finding on a larger sample. METHODS: We included 488 parturients of whom 240 were women from the original study. Women were randomly assigned to receive either rocuronium 1mg/kg (ROC n=245) or suxamethonium 1mg/kg (SUX n=243) after propofol 2mg/kg. Anaesthesia was maintained with up to 50% nitrous oxide and up to one minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane until the umbilical cord was clamped. We compared neonatal outcome using Apgar scores and umbilical cord blood gases. RESULTS: Data were analysed for 525 newborns (ROC n=263vs. SUX n=262). There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of Apgar scores <7 at 1min (ROC 17.5% vs. SUX 10.3%, P=0.023) but no difference at 5min (ROC 8% vs. SUX 4.2%, P=0.1) or 10min (ROC 3.0% vs. SUX 1.9%, P=0.58). There was no difference between groups in other measured outcomes. CONCLUSION: The use of rocuronium was associated with lower Apgar scores at 1min compared with suxamethonium. The clinical significance of this is unclear and warrants further investigation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18024949
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200212161643.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2017 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.05.001 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28606652
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Kosinova, M $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Rocuronium versus suxamethonium for rapid sequence induction of general anaesthesia for caesarean section: influence on neonatal outcomes / $c M. Kosinova, P. Stourac, M. Adamus, D. Seidlova, T. Pavlik, P. Janku, I. Krikava, Z. Mrozek, M. Prochazka, J. Klucka, R. Stoudek, I. Bartikova, H. Harazim, H. Robotkova, K. Hejduk, Z. Hodicka, M. Kirchnerova, J. Francakova, LO. Pyszkova, J. Hlozkova, P. Sevcik,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: In a previous study we compared rocuronium and suxamethonium for rapid-sequence induction of general anaesthesia for caesarean section and found no difference in maternal outcome. There was however, a significant difference in Apgar scores. As this was a secondary outcome, we extended the study to explore this finding on a larger sample. METHODS: We included 488 parturients of whom 240 were women from the original study. Women were randomly assigned to receive either rocuronium 1mg/kg (ROC n=245) or suxamethonium 1mg/kg (SUX n=243) after propofol 2mg/kg. Anaesthesia was maintained with up to 50% nitrous oxide and up to one minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane until the umbilical cord was clamped. We compared neonatal outcome using Apgar scores and umbilical cord blood gases. RESULTS: Data were analysed for 525 newborns (ROC n=263vs. SUX n=262). There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of Apgar scores <7 at 1min (ROC 17.5% vs. SUX 10.3%, P=0.023) but no difference at 5min (ROC 8% vs. SUX 4.2%, P=0.1) or 10min (ROC 3.0% vs. SUX 1.9%, P=0.58). There was no difference between groups in other measured outcomes. CONCLUSION: The use of rocuronium was associated with lower Apgar scores at 1min compared with suxamethonium. The clinical significance of this is unclear and warrants further investigation.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a androstanoly $x farmakologie $7 D000732
650    _2
$a celková anestezie $x metody $7 D000768
650    _2
$a porodnická anestezie $x metody $7 D000773
650    12
$a Apgar skóre $7 D001034
650    _2
$a císařský řez $7 D002585
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a sukcinylcholin $x farmakologie $7 D013390
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Stourac, P $u Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: petr.stourac@gmail.com.
700    1_
$a Adamus, M $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Seidlova, D $u 2nd Anesthesiological Department, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pavlik, T $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Janku, P $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Krikava, I $u Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mrozek, Z $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Prochazka, M $u Department of Midwifery, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Klucka, J $u Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stoudek, R $u Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bartikova, I $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Harazim, H $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Robotkova, H $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hejduk, Karel $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. $7 xx0227632
700    1_
$a Hodicka, Z $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kirchnerova, M $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Francakova, J $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pyszkova, L Obare $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hlozkova, J $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sevcik, P $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00009903 $t International journal of obstetric anesthesia $x 1532-3374 $g Roč. 32, č. - (2017), s. 4-10
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28606652 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200212162038 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1317080 $s 1021870
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 32 $c - $d 4-10 $e 20170510 $i 1532-3374 $m International journal of obstetric anesthesia $n Int J Obstet Anesth $x MED00009903
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709
Zpět

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace