-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Formation of protective deposits by anti-erosive toothpastes-A microscopic study on enamel with artificial defects
P. Bradna, R. Vrbova, V. Fialova, D. Housova, E. Gojisova,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
26492940
DOI
10.1002/sca.21281
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- eroze zubů prevence a kontrola MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- zubní pasty farmakologie MeSH
- zubní sklovina ultrastruktura MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
This study investigated formation of protective deposits on the enamel surface after application of several anti-erosive toothpastes with different active ingredients. NaF-containing Sensodyne Pronamel, SnCl2 /F-based Elmex Erosion Protection and calcium phosphate-based BioRepair Plus Sensitivity Control, SensiShield and Enamel Care toothpastes with claimed anti-erosive properties were tested. Artificial saliva and Elmex Erosion Protection mouth rinse served as control groups. The toothpastes were applied 30 times by a toothbrush for 2 min per day, mouth rinse for 30 s on polished enamel of thirty five human molars (n = 5) with series of five rhomboid-shaped indents of various length prepared by a Knoop indentor. After 15 and 30 applications, the shape of the indents and surface morphology was characterised using light and scanning electron microscopy. At the end of treatment, the samples were exposed to 0.2 wt. % citric acid (pH 3.30) to test resistance of the treated enamel to erosion. Pronounced differences were observed between protective properties of the toothpastes. While Sensodyne Pronamel and BioRepair Plus Sensitivity Control did not produce any protective deposits, Enamel Care formed a compact layer of deposits which protected the enamel surface against erosion. With Elmex Erosion Protection and SensiShield fractured indent edges and scratches on the treated enamel suggested that their abrasive properties prevailed over ability of active ingredients to form deposits. These results revealed that toothpastes with strong potential to form acid-resistant deposits on the enamel surface and of low abrasivity should be used for effective prevention of enamel erosion. SCANNING 38:380-388, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18025403
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180718110401.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180709s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/sca.21281 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26492940
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Bradna, Pavel $u School of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. bradna@vus.cz. Department of Stomatology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. bradna@vus.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Formation of protective deposits by anti-erosive toothpastes-A microscopic study on enamel with artificial defects / $c P. Bradna, R. Vrbova, V. Fialova, D. Housova, E. Gojisova,
- 520 9_
- $a This study investigated formation of protective deposits on the enamel surface after application of several anti-erosive toothpastes with different active ingredients. NaF-containing Sensodyne Pronamel, SnCl2 /F-based Elmex Erosion Protection and calcium phosphate-based BioRepair Plus Sensitivity Control, SensiShield and Enamel Care toothpastes with claimed anti-erosive properties were tested. Artificial saliva and Elmex Erosion Protection mouth rinse served as control groups. The toothpastes were applied 30 times by a toothbrush for 2 min per day, mouth rinse for 30 s on polished enamel of thirty five human molars (n = 5) with series of five rhomboid-shaped indents of various length prepared by a Knoop indentor. After 15 and 30 applications, the shape of the indents and surface morphology was characterised using light and scanning electron microscopy. At the end of treatment, the samples were exposed to 0.2 wt. % citric acid (pH 3.30) to test resistance of the treated enamel to erosion. Pronounced differences were observed between protective properties of the toothpastes. While Sensodyne Pronamel and BioRepair Plus Sensitivity Control did not produce any protective deposits, Enamel Care formed a compact layer of deposits which protected the enamel surface against erosion. With Elmex Erosion Protection and SensiShield fractured indent edges and scratches on the treated enamel suggested that their abrasive properties prevailed over ability of active ingredients to form deposits. These results revealed that toothpastes with strong potential to form acid-resistant deposits on the enamel surface and of low abrasivity should be used for effective prevention of enamel erosion. SCANNING 38:380-388, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
- 650 _2
- $a zubní sklovina $x ultrastruktura $7 D003743
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a eroze zubů $x prevence a kontrola $7 D014077
- 650 _2
- $a zubní pasty $x farmakologie $7 D014100
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Vrbova, Radka $u School of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Fialova, Vlasta $u School of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Housova, Devana $u School of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Gojisova, Eva $u Department of Stomatology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004280 $t Scanning $x 1932-8745 $g Roč. 38, č. 5 (2016), s. 380-388
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26492940 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180718110701 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1317534 $s 1022324
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 38 $c 5 $d 380-388 $e 20151023 $i 1932-8745 $m Scanning $n Scanning $x MED00004280
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180709