• Something wrong with this record ?

Small-scale spatial variability of flame retardants in indoor dust and implications for dust sampling

S. Jílková, L. Melymuk, Š. Vojta, M. Vykoukalová, P. Bohlin-Nizzetto, J. Klánová,

. 2018 ; 206 (-) : 132-141. [pub] 20180423

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Indoor dust is often used to evaluate levels of organic compounds indoors, particularly for compounds with indoor sources, such as flame retardants (FRs). Yet there are uncertainties about the type of information that can be obtained from indoor dust. This study reports detailed dust sampling to assess spatial variability in indoor dust concentrations, the relationship between FR sources and dust, and the implications when interpreting dust concentrations. Multiple dust samples were collected from a range of surface types in three large rooms: a residential flat, a university seminar room, and a university computer room. Samples were analysed for polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), novel halogenated flame retardants (NFRs) and organophosphate esters (OPEs). FR levels in dust varied significantly between and within rooms. Levels typically ranged over one order of magnitude within a room, and up to four orders of magnitude for a few OPEs. The spatial distribution of FRs related (in some cases) to proximity to sources, surface properties, and dust surface loadings. Differences also existed between surface and floor dusts, e.g., the contribution of TBOEP to ∑OPEs was higher in floor than surface dust, which has implications for human exposure assessment; adults typically have more contact with elevated surfaces, while young children have greater contact with floor surfaces. Overall, significant spatial heterogeneity exists in indoor dust, even in seemingly homogeneous indoor spaces, thus hampering comparability between studies and locations when single samples are collected. Composite samples are strongly recommended to limit the influence of spatial heterogeneity.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033101
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181009110247.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.146 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29734094
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Jílková, Simona $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Small-scale spatial variability of flame retardants in indoor dust and implications for dust sampling / $c S. Jílková, L. Melymuk, Š. Vojta, M. Vykoukalová, P. Bohlin-Nizzetto, J. Klánová,
520    9_
$a Indoor dust is often used to evaluate levels of organic compounds indoors, particularly for compounds with indoor sources, such as flame retardants (FRs). Yet there are uncertainties about the type of information that can be obtained from indoor dust. This study reports detailed dust sampling to assess spatial variability in indoor dust concentrations, the relationship between FR sources and dust, and the implications when interpreting dust concentrations. Multiple dust samples were collected from a range of surface types in three large rooms: a residential flat, a university seminar room, and a university computer room. Samples were analysed for polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), novel halogenated flame retardants (NFRs) and organophosphate esters (OPEs). FR levels in dust varied significantly between and within rooms. Levels typically ranged over one order of magnitude within a room, and up to four orders of magnitude for a few OPEs. The spatial distribution of FRs related (in some cases) to proximity to sources, surface properties, and dust surface loadings. Differences also existed between surface and floor dusts, e.g., the contribution of TBOEP to ∑OPEs was higher in floor than surface dust, which has implications for human exposure assessment; adults typically have more contact with elevated surfaces, while young children have greater contact with floor surfaces. Overall, significant spatial heterogeneity exists in indoor dust, even in seemingly homogeneous indoor spaces, thus hampering comparability between studies and locations when single samples are collected. Composite samples are strongly recommended to limit the influence of spatial heterogeneity.
650    _2
$a znečištění vzduchu ve vnitřním prostředí $x analýza $7 D016902
650    _2
$a prach $x analýza $7 D004391
650    _2
$a monitorování životního prostředí $x metody $7 D004784
650    _2
$a retardanty hoření $x terapeutické užití $7 D005411
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Melymuk, Lisa $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: melymuk@recetox.muni.cz.
700    1_
$a Vojta, Šimon $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vykoukalová, Martina $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bohlin-Nizzetto, Pernilla $u Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU), Kjeller, Norway.
700    1_
$a Klánová, Jana $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00002124 $t Chemosphere $x 1879-1298 $g Roč. 206, č. - (2018), s. 132-141
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29734094 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181009110735 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1340016 $s 1030095
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 206 $c - $d 132-141 $e 20180423 $i 1879-1298 $m Chemosphere $n Chemosphere $x MED00002124
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Find record

Citation metrics

Logged in users only

Archiving options

Loading data ...