-
Something wrong with this record ?
The CS algorithm: A novel method for high frequency oscillation detection in EEG
J. Cimbálník, A. Hewitt, G. Worrell, M. Stead,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Algorithms * MeSH
- Artifacts MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Electroencephalography methods MeSH
- Epilepsy diagnosis physiopathology MeSH
- False Positive Reactions MeSH
- Rodentia MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Brain physiology physiopathology MeSH
- Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted MeSH
- Dogs MeSH
- ROC Curve MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Dogs MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: High frequency oscillations (HFOs) are emerging as potentially clinically important biomarkers for localizing seizure generating regions in epileptic brain. These events, however, are too frequent, and occur on too small a time scale to be identified quickly or reliably by human reviewers. Many of the deficiencies of the HFO detection algorithms published to date are addressed by the CS algorithm presented here. NEW METHOD: The algorithm employs novel methods for: 1) normalization; 2) storage of parameters to model human expertise; 3) differentiating highly localized oscillations from filtering phenomena; and 4) defining temporal extents of detected events. RESULTS: Receiver-operator characteristic curves demonstrate very low false positive rates with concomitantly high true positive rates over a large range of detector thresholds. The temporal resolution is shown to be +/-∼5ms for event boundaries. Computational efficiency is sufficient for use in a clinical setting. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The algorithm performance is directly compared to two established algorithms by Staba (2002) and Gardner (2007). Comparison with all published algorithms is beyond the scope of this work, but the features of all are discussed. All code and example data sets are freely available. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm is shown to have high sensitivity and specificity for HFOs, be robust to common forms of artifact in EEG, and have performance adequate for use in a clinical setting.
International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18033750
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20181024150007.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 181008s2018 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.08.023 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28860077
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Cimbálník, Jan $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 14
- $a The CS algorithm: A novel method for high frequency oscillation detection in EEG / $c J. Cimbálník, A. Hewitt, G. Worrell, M. Stead,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: High frequency oscillations (HFOs) are emerging as potentially clinically important biomarkers for localizing seizure generating regions in epileptic brain. These events, however, are too frequent, and occur on too small a time scale to be identified quickly or reliably by human reviewers. Many of the deficiencies of the HFO detection algorithms published to date are addressed by the CS algorithm presented here. NEW METHOD: The algorithm employs novel methods for: 1) normalization; 2) storage of parameters to model human expertise; 3) differentiating highly localized oscillations from filtering phenomena; and 4) defining temporal extents of detected events. RESULTS: Receiver-operator characteristic curves demonstrate very low false positive rates with concomitantly high true positive rates over a large range of detector thresholds. The temporal resolution is shown to be +/-∼5ms for event boundaries. Computational efficiency is sufficient for use in a clinical setting. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The algorithm performance is directly compared to two established algorithms by Staba (2002) and Gardner (2007). Comparison with all published algorithms is beyond the scope of this work, but the features of all are discussed. All code and example data sets are freely available. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm is shown to have high sensitivity and specificity for HFOs, be robust to common forms of artifact in EEG, and have performance adequate for use in a clinical setting.
- 650 12
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a artefakty $7 D016477
- 650 _2
- $a mozek $x fyziologie $x patofyziologie $7 D001921
- 650 _2
- $a psi $7 D004285
- 650 _2
- $a elektroencefalografie $x metody $7 D004569
- 650 _2
- $a epilepsie $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D004827
- 650 _2
- $a falešně pozitivní reakce $7 D005189
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ROC křivka $7 D012372
- 650 _2
- $a hlodavci $7 D012377
- 650 _2
- $a počítačové zpracování signálu $7 D012815
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Hewitt, Angela $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Worrell, Greg $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Stead, Matt $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: mattstead@me.com.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002841 $t Journal of neuroscience methods $x 1872-678X $g Roč. 293, č. - (2018), s. 6-16
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28860077 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20181008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20181024150516 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1339579 $s 1030744
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 293 $c - $d 6-16 $e 20170830 $i 1872-678X $m Journal of neuroscience methods $n J Neurosci Methods $x MED00002841
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20181008