• Something wrong with this record ?

Recognizing European cancer nursing: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence of effectiveness and value of cancer nursing

P. Campbell, C. Torrens, D. Kelly, A. Charalambous, N. Domenech-Climent, I. Nohavova, U. Östlund, E. Patiraki, D. Salisbury, L. Sharp, T. Wiseman, W. Oldenmenger, M. Wells,

. 2017 ; 73 (12) : 3144-3153. [pub] 20170825

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18033835

AIM: To identify, appraise and synthesize the available evidence relating to the value and impact of cancer nursing on patient experience and outcomes. BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance and contribution of cancer nurses, however, a comprehensive review examining how cancer nurses have an impact on care quality, patient outcomes and overall experience of cancer, as well as cost of services across the entire cancer spectrum is lacking. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis using Cochrane methods. METHODS: We will systematically search 10 electronic databases from 2000, with pre-determined search terms. No language restrictions will be applied. We will include all randomized and controlled before-and-after studies that compare cancer nursing interventions to a standard care or no intervention. Two reviewers will independently assess the eligibility of the studies and appraise methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Disagreements will be resolved by discussion and may involve a third reviewer if necessary. Data from included studies will be extracted in accordance with the Template for intervention Description and Replication reporting guidelines. Missing data will be actively sought from all trialists. Data will be synthesized in evidence tables and narrative to answer three key questions. If sufficient data are available, we will perform meta-analyses. DISCUSSION: This review will allow us to systematically assess the impact of cancer nursing on patient care and experience. This evidence will be used to determine implications for clinical practice and used to inform future programme and policy decisions in Europe.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033835
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181016115000.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jan.13392 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28702945
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Campbell, Pauline $u Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
245    10
$a Recognizing European cancer nursing: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence of effectiveness and value of cancer nursing / $c P. Campbell, C. Torrens, D. Kelly, A. Charalambous, N. Domenech-Climent, I. Nohavova, U. Östlund, E. Patiraki, D. Salisbury, L. Sharp, T. Wiseman, W. Oldenmenger, M. Wells,
520    9_
$a AIM: To identify, appraise and synthesize the available evidence relating to the value and impact of cancer nursing on patient experience and outcomes. BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance and contribution of cancer nurses, however, a comprehensive review examining how cancer nurses have an impact on care quality, patient outcomes and overall experience of cancer, as well as cost of services across the entire cancer spectrum is lacking. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis using Cochrane methods. METHODS: We will systematically search 10 electronic databases from 2000, with pre-determined search terms. No language restrictions will be applied. We will include all randomized and controlled before-and-after studies that compare cancer nursing interventions to a standard care or no intervention. Two reviewers will independently assess the eligibility of the studies and appraise methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Disagreements will be resolved by discussion and may involve a third reviewer if necessary. Data from included studies will be extracted in accordance with the Template for intervention Description and Replication reporting guidelines. Missing data will be actively sought from all trialists. Data will be synthesized in evidence tables and narrative to answer three key questions. If sufficient data are available, we will perform meta-analyses. DISCUSSION: This review will allow us to systematically assess the impact of cancer nursing on patient care and experience. This evidence will be used to determine implications for clinical practice and used to inform future programme and policy decisions in Europe.
650    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
650    12
$a ošetřovatelství založené na důkazech $7 D055318
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a vztahy mezi ošetřovatelkou a pacientem $7 D009723
650    12
$a onkologické ošetřovatelství $7 D009859
650    _2
$a společnosti ošetřovatelské $7 D012956
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Torrens, Claire $u Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
700    1_
$a Kelly, Daniel $u School of Healthcare Sciences, University of Cardiff, Wales, UK.
700    1_
$a Charalambous, Andreas $u Department of Nursing Studies, Cyprus University of Technology, Cyprus, Cyprus.
700    1_
$a Domenech-Climent, Nuria $u Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
700    1_
$a Nohavova, Iveta $u Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Östlund, Ulrika $u Centre for Research & Development, Uppsala University/Region, Gävleborg, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Patiraki, Elisabeth $u Nursing Faculty, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
700    1_
$a Salisbury, David $u Macmillian Cancer Support, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Sharp, Lena $u Regional Cancer Centre, Stockholm-Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Wiseman, Theresa $u The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. University of Southampton, UK.
700    1_
$a Oldenmenger, Wendy $u Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Wells, Mary $u Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit (NMAHP RU), University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
773    0_
$w MED00002500 $t Journal of advanced nursing $x 1365-2648 $g Roč. 73, č. 12 (2017), s. 3144-3153
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28702945 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181016115457 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1340316 $s 1030829
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 73 $c 12 $d 3144-3153 $e 20170825 $i 1365-2648 $m Journal of advanced nursing $n J Adv Nurs $x MED00002500
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options