Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Field-Based and Lab-Based Assisted Jumping: Unveiling the Testing and Training Implications

JJ. Tufano, J. Malecek, M. Steffl, P. Stastny, V. Hojka, T. Vetrovsky,

. 2018 ; 9 (-) : 1284. [pub] 20180912

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Purpose: Assisted jumping can supplement resistance training and traditional plyometric training to increase vertical jump performance. However, as coaches may choose to make field-based decisions based on lab-based research, this study determined whether a field-based assisted jumping set-up results in different ground contact times (CT), take off forces (TOF), flight times (FT), and impact forces (IF) compared to a lab-based set-up. Methods: Eighteen active males (24.8 ± 3.0 yr; 178.8 ± 7.8 cm; 77.8 ± 7.8 kg) performed two sessions of assisted jumping: one with each hand holding a commercially available resistance band (1m) that was attached to a pull-up bar (FIELD), and the other with assistance from a custom-built system of ropes, pulleys, and long (3 m) elastic bands (LAB). With each set-up, subjects performed five sets of five countermovement jumps on a force plate. Each set was performed with either bodyweight (BW), 90, 80, 70, or 60% of BW, which was achieved by either grabbing higher or lower on the bands during FIELD, or by being pulled upward via a full-body harness during LAB. The order of each visit was counter-balanced, and the order of jumps within each visit was quasi-randomized. Data from the 90, 80, 70, and 60% trials for each set-up were then expressed relative to the data of BW jumps, and these relative values were then used for analysis. Results: CTFIELD was less than CTLAB at 80, 70, and 60%. FTFIELD was greater than FTLAB at 90 and 80%, but FTLAB became greater at 60%. TOF and IF remained unchanged during LAB, but TOFFIELD was consistently less than TOF during BW, with IFFIELD generally being greater than IFLAB. Conclusion: If the purpose of assisted jumping is to spend less time on the ground without decreasing force, systems with finite adjustments and longer bands like LAB should be used. However, shorter bands similar to FIELD may also be used; but due to the larger variability of assistance throughout the range of motion, such systems may alter the neuromuscular characteristics of the jump in other ways that should be investigated in future research.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18034153
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181010124820.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2018 sz f 000 00|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fphys.2018.01284 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30258367
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Tufano, James J $u Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
245    10
$a Field-Based and Lab-Based Assisted Jumping: Unveiling the Testing and Training Implications / $c JJ. Tufano, J. Malecek, M. Steffl, P. Stastny, V. Hojka, T. Vetrovsky,
520    9_
$a Purpose: Assisted jumping can supplement resistance training and traditional plyometric training to increase vertical jump performance. However, as coaches may choose to make field-based decisions based on lab-based research, this study determined whether a field-based assisted jumping set-up results in different ground contact times (CT), take off forces (TOF), flight times (FT), and impact forces (IF) compared to a lab-based set-up. Methods: Eighteen active males (24.8 ± 3.0 yr; 178.8 ± 7.8 cm; 77.8 ± 7.8 kg) performed two sessions of assisted jumping: one with each hand holding a commercially available resistance band (1m) that was attached to a pull-up bar (FIELD), and the other with assistance from a custom-built system of ropes, pulleys, and long (3 m) elastic bands (LAB). With each set-up, subjects performed five sets of five countermovement jumps on a force plate. Each set was performed with either bodyweight (BW), 90, 80, 70, or 60% of BW, which was achieved by either grabbing higher or lower on the bands during FIELD, or by being pulled upward via a full-body harness during LAB. The order of each visit was counter-balanced, and the order of jumps within each visit was quasi-randomized. Data from the 90, 80, 70, and 60% trials for each set-up were then expressed relative to the data of BW jumps, and these relative values were then used for analysis. Results: CTFIELD was less than CTLAB at 80, 70, and 60%. FTFIELD was greater than FTLAB at 90 and 80%, but FTLAB became greater at 60%. TOF and IF remained unchanged during LAB, but TOFFIELD was consistently less than TOF during BW, with IFFIELD generally being greater than IFLAB. Conclusion: If the purpose of assisted jumping is to spend less time on the ground without decreasing force, systems with finite adjustments and longer bands like LAB should be used. However, shorter bands similar to FIELD may also be used; but due to the larger variability of assistance throughout the range of motion, such systems may alter the neuromuscular characteristics of the jump in other ways that should be investigated in future research.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Malecek, Jan $u Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Steffl, Michal $u Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Stastny, Petr $u Department of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Hojka, Vladimir $u Department of Track and Field, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Vetrovsky, Tomas $u Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
773    0_
$w MED00174601 $t Frontiers in physiology $x 1664-042X $g Roč. 9, č. - (2018), s. 1284
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30258367 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181010125310 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1341042 $s 1031147
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 9 $c - $d 1284 $e 20180912 $i 1664-042X $m Frontiers in physiology $n Front. physiol. $x MED00174601
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...