-
Something wrong with this record ?
Automated Analysis of Microscopic Images of Isolated Pancreatic Islets
D Habart, J Svihlik, J Schier, M Cahova, P Girman, K Zacharovova, Z Berkova, J Kriz, E Fabryova, L Kosinova, Z Papackova, J Kybic, F Saudek
Language English Country United States
Grant support
NT13099
MZ0
CEP Register
Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
Source
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2016-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2016-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1992
- MeSH
- Algorithms MeSH
- Automation MeSH
- Rats MeSH
- Islets of Langerhans * cytology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted * MeSH
- Rats, Wistar MeSH
- Machine Learning MeSH
- Islets of Langerhans Transplantation * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Rats MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
Clinical islet transplantation programs rely on the capacities of individual centers to quantify isolated islets. Current computer-assisted methods require input from human operators. Here we describe two machine learning algorithms for islet quantification: the trainable islet algorithm (TIA) and the nontrainable purity algorithm (NPA). These algorithms automatically segment pancreatic islets and exocrine tissue on microscopic images in order to count individual islets and calculate islet volume and purity. References for islet counts and volumes were generated by the fully manual segmentation (FMS) method, which was validated against the internal DNA standard. References for islet purity were generated via the expert visual assessment (EVA) method, which was validated against the FMS method. The TIA is intended to automatically evaluate micrographs of isolated islets from future donors after being trained on micrographs from a limited number of past donors. Its training ability was first evaluated on 46 images from four donors. The pixel-to-pixel comparison, binary statistics, and islet DNA concentration indicated that the TIA was successfully trained, regardless of the color differences of the original images. Next, the TIA trained on the four donors was validated on an additional 36 images from nine independent donors. The TIA was fast (67 s/image), correlated very well with the FMS method (R2=1.00 and 0.92 for islet volume and islet count, respectively), and had small REs (0.06 and 0.07 for islet volume and islet count, respectively). Validation of the NPA against the EVA method using 70 images from 12 donors revealed that the NPA had a reasonable speed (69 s/image), had an acceptable RE (0.14), and correlated well with the EVA method (R2=0.88). Our results demonstrate that a fully automated analysis of clinical-grade micrographs of isolated pancreatic islets is feasible. The algorithms described herein will be freely available as a Fiji platform plugin.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18036873
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20181105111647.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 181105s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3727/096368916X692005 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27302978
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Habart David
- 245 10
- $a Automated Analysis of Microscopic Images of Isolated Pancreatic Islets / $c D Habart, J Svihlik, J Schier, M Cahova, P Girman, K Zacharovova, Z Berkova, J Kriz, E Fabryova, L Kosinova, Z Papackova, J Kybic, F Saudek
- 520 9_
- $a Clinical islet transplantation programs rely on the capacities of individual centers to quantify isolated islets. Current computer-assisted methods require input from human operators. Here we describe two machine learning algorithms for islet quantification: the trainable islet algorithm (TIA) and the nontrainable purity algorithm (NPA). These algorithms automatically segment pancreatic islets and exocrine tissue on microscopic images in order to count individual islets and calculate islet volume and purity. References for islet counts and volumes were generated by the fully manual segmentation (FMS) method, which was validated against the internal DNA standard. References for islet purity were generated via the expert visual assessment (EVA) method, which was validated against the FMS method. The TIA is intended to automatically evaluate micrographs of isolated islets from future donors after being trained on micrographs from a limited number of past donors. Its training ability was first evaluated on 46 images from four donors. The pixel-to-pixel comparison, binary statistics, and islet DNA concentration indicated that the TIA was successfully trained, regardless of the color differences of the original images. Next, the TIA trained on the four donors was validated on an additional 36 images from nine independent donors. The TIA was fast (67 s/image), correlated very well with the FMS method (R2=1.00 and 0.92 for islet volume and islet count, respectively), and had small REs (0.06 and 0.07 for islet volume and islet count, respectively). Validation of the NPA against the EVA method using 70 images from 12 donors revealed that the NPA had a reasonable speed (69 s/image), had an acceptable RE (0.14), and correlated well with the EVA method (R2=0.88). Our results demonstrate that a fully automated analysis of clinical-grade micrographs of isolated pancreatic islets is feasible. The algorithms described herein will be freely available as a Fiji platform plugin.
- 590 __
- $a bohemika - dle Pubmed
- 650 02
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 02
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 02
- $a automatizace $7 D001331
- 650 02
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a počítačové zpracování obrazu $7 D007091
- 650 12
- $a Langerhansovy ostrůvky $x cytologie $7 D007515
- 650 12
- $a transplantace Langerhansových ostrůvků $7 D016381
- 650 02
- $a strojové učení $7 D000069550
- 650 02
- $a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
- 650 02
- $a potkani Wistar $7 D017208
- 700 1_
- $a Svihlik Jan
- 700 1_
- $a Schier J
- 700 1_
- $a Cahová, Monika $7 xx0070633
- 700 1_
- $a Girman, Peter $7 xx0081892
- 700 1_
- $a Zacharovová, Klára $7 xx0074471
- 700 1_
- $a Berková, Zuzana $7 xx0081890
- 700 1_
- $a Kříž, Jan, $d 1972- $7 xx0056572
- 700 1_
- $a Fábryová, Eva $7 _AN074825
- 700 1_
- $a Kosinová, Lucie $7 _AN089763
- 700 1_
- $a Papáčková, Zuzana $7 xx0213744
- 700 1_
- $a Kybic, Jan, $d 1974- $7 xx0028484
- 700 1_
- $a Saudek, František, $d 1955- $7 nlk20000083698
- 773 0_
- $t Cell Transplantation $g Roč. 25, č. 12 (2016), s. 2145-2156 $p Cell Transplant $x 0963-6897 $w MED00001075
- 773 0_
- $p Cell Transplant $g 25(12):2145-2156, 2016 12 13
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20181105111721 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20181105111721 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1348521 $s 1033899
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 25 $c 12 $d 2145-2156 $x MED00001075 $i 0963-6897 $m Cell transplantation
- GRA __
- $a NT13099 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a NLK 2018/lp