-
Something wrong with this record ?
Population specificity of sex estimation from vertebrae
M. Hora, V. Sládek,
Language English Country Ireland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-02-07 to 2 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 1997-02-07 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-02-07 to 2 months ago
- MeSH
- Lumbar Vertebrae anatomy & histology MeSH
- Discriminant Analysis MeSH
- Thoracic Vertebrae anatomy & histology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Forensic Anthropology MeSH
- Sex Determination by Skeleton methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
Vertebral measurements have been shown to provide accurate classification of sex. However, the use of vertebral discriminant functions (DFs) in forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology is limited due to the unknown degree of their population specificity. Additionally, the performance of vertebral DFs has not yet been assessed at higher posterior probability thresholds. In this study, we tested the performance of previously published DFs for sex classification from Th12 and L1 vertebrae within a range of 0.5-0.95 posterior probabilities in a model of geographically distant population based on an autopsy Central European (CE) sample (Czech Republic; n=72) from the 1930s. Further, we derived new pooled DFs from a sample representing ecogeographically diverse populations, new DFs derived from the autopsy CE sample, and new Medieval CE DFs derived from the Pohansko sample (n=129) and evaluated their performance at our testing autopsy CE sample. Most vertebral measurements showed population specificity in sex assessment. However, we identified two Th12 measurements (anteroposterior body diameter and mediolateral body diameter) usable for sex estimation across populations. We showed that the accuracy of vertebral DFs can be increased to 95% of correctly classified individuals in up to 64% of the studied sample by setting a higher posterior probability threshold. Finally, we showed that even the DFs derived from relatively small subsamples (30% of the population size) can provide accurate sex classification. This finding highlights the applicability of the hybrid approach in sex classification from vertebrae. To facilitate sex classification from vertebrae, we provide a software tool for sex classification from any vertebral measurement and reference samples tested in this study including the previously published DFs.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19000358
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200923170637.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190107s2018 ie f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.015 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30236909
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ie
- 100 1_
- $a Hora, Martin $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 12843 Praha 2, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: mrtnh@seznam.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Population specificity of sex estimation from vertebrae / $c M. Hora, V. Sládek,
- 520 9_
- $a Vertebral measurements have been shown to provide accurate classification of sex. However, the use of vertebral discriminant functions (DFs) in forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology is limited due to the unknown degree of their population specificity. Additionally, the performance of vertebral DFs has not yet been assessed at higher posterior probability thresholds. In this study, we tested the performance of previously published DFs for sex classification from Th12 and L1 vertebrae within a range of 0.5-0.95 posterior probabilities in a model of geographically distant population based on an autopsy Central European (CE) sample (Czech Republic; n=72) from the 1930s. Further, we derived new pooled DFs from a sample representing ecogeographically diverse populations, new DFs derived from the autopsy CE sample, and new Medieval CE DFs derived from the Pohansko sample (n=129) and evaluated their performance at our testing autopsy CE sample. Most vertebral measurements showed population specificity in sex assessment. However, we identified two Th12 measurements (anteroposterior body diameter and mediolateral body diameter) usable for sex estimation across populations. We showed that the accuracy of vertebral DFs can be increased to 95% of correctly classified individuals in up to 64% of the studied sample by setting a higher posterior probability threshold. Finally, we showed that even the DFs derived from relatively small subsamples (30% of the population size) can provide accurate sex classification. This finding highlights the applicability of the hybrid approach in sex classification from vertebrae. To facilitate sex classification from vertebrae, we provide a software tool for sex classification from any vertebral measurement and reference samples tested in this study including the previously published DFs.
- 650 _2
- $a diskriminační analýza $7 D016002
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a soudní antropologie $7 D018732
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a bederní obratle $x anatomie a histologie $7 D008159
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a určení pohlaví podle kostry $x metody $7 D054881
- 650 _2
- $a hrudní obratle $x anatomie a histologie $7 D013904
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Sládek, Vladimír $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 12843 Praha 2, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001844 $t Forensic science international $x 1872-6283 $g Roč. 291, č. - (2018), s. 279.e1-279.e12
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30236909 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200923170634 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1364464 $s 1038481
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 291 $c - $d 279.e1-279.e12 $e 20180825 $i 1872-6283 $m Forensic science international $n Forensic Sci Int $x MED00001844
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190107