Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Whole genome sequencing and function prediction of 133 gut anaerobes isolated from chicken caecum in pure cultures

M. Medvecky, D. Cejkova, O. Polansky, D. Karasova, T. Kubasova, A. Cizek, I. Rychlik,

. 2018 ; 19 (1) : 561. [pub] 20180731

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19000504

BACKGROUND: In order to start to understand the function of individual members of gut microbiota, we cultured, sequenced and analysed bacterial anaerobes from chicken caecum. RESULTS: Altogether 204 isolates from chicken caecum were obtained in pure cultures using Wilkins-Chalgren anaerobe agar and anaerobic growth conditions. Genomes of all the isolates were determined using the NextSeq platform and subjected to bioinformatic analysis. Among 204 sequenced isolates we identified 133 different strains belonging to seven different phyla - Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Elusimicrobia and Synergistetes. Genome sizes ranged from 1.51 Mb in Elusimicrobium minutum to 6.70 Mb in Bacteroides ovatus. Clustering based on the presence of protein coding genes showed that isolates from phyla Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Elusimicrobia and Synergistetes did not cluster with the remaining isolates. Firmicutes split into families Lactobacillaceae, Enterococcaceae, Veillonellaceae and order Clostridiales from which the Clostridium perfringens isolates formed a distinct sub-cluster. All Bacteroidetes isolates formed a separate cluster showing similar genetic composition in all isolates but distinct from the rest of the gut anaerobes. The majority of Actinobacteria clustered closely together except for the representatives of genus Gordonibacter showing that the genome of this genus differs from the rest of Actinobacteria sequenced in this study. Representatives of Bacteroidetes commonly encoded proteins (collagenase, hemagglutinin, hemolysin, hyaluronidase, heparinases, chondroitinase, mucin-desulfating sulfatase or glutamate decarboxylase) that may enable them to interact with their host. Aerotolerance was recorded in Akkermansia and Cloacibacillus and was also common among representatives of Bacteroidetes. On the other hand, Elusimicrobium and the majority of Clostridiales were highly sensitive to air exposure despite their potential for spore formation. CONCLUSIONS: Major gut microbiota members utilise different strategies for gut colonisation. High oxygen sensitivity of Firmicutes may explain their commonly reported decrease after oxidative burst during gut inflammation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19000504
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190108125947.0
007      
ta
008      
190107s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12864-018-4959-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30064352
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Medvecky, Matej $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Whole genome sequencing and function prediction of 133 gut anaerobes isolated from chicken caecum in pure cultures / $c M. Medvecky, D. Cejkova, O. Polansky, D. Karasova, T. Kubasova, A. Cizek, I. Rychlik,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: In order to start to understand the function of individual members of gut microbiota, we cultured, sequenced and analysed bacterial anaerobes from chicken caecum. RESULTS: Altogether 204 isolates from chicken caecum were obtained in pure cultures using Wilkins-Chalgren anaerobe agar and anaerobic growth conditions. Genomes of all the isolates were determined using the NextSeq platform and subjected to bioinformatic analysis. Among 204 sequenced isolates we identified 133 different strains belonging to seven different phyla - Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Elusimicrobia and Synergistetes. Genome sizes ranged from 1.51 Mb in Elusimicrobium minutum to 6.70 Mb in Bacteroides ovatus. Clustering based on the presence of protein coding genes showed that isolates from phyla Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Elusimicrobia and Synergistetes did not cluster with the remaining isolates. Firmicutes split into families Lactobacillaceae, Enterococcaceae, Veillonellaceae and order Clostridiales from which the Clostridium perfringens isolates formed a distinct sub-cluster. All Bacteroidetes isolates formed a separate cluster showing similar genetic composition in all isolates but distinct from the rest of the gut anaerobes. The majority of Actinobacteria clustered closely together except for the representatives of genus Gordonibacter showing that the genome of this genus differs from the rest of Actinobacteria sequenced in this study. Representatives of Bacteroidetes commonly encoded proteins (collagenase, hemagglutinin, hemolysin, hyaluronidase, heparinases, chondroitinase, mucin-desulfating sulfatase or glutamate decarboxylase) that may enable them to interact with their host. Aerotolerance was recorded in Akkermansia and Cloacibacillus and was also common among representatives of Bacteroidetes. On the other hand, Elusimicrobium and the majority of Clostridiales were highly sensitive to air exposure despite their potential for spore formation. CONCLUSIONS: Major gut microbiota members utilise different strategies for gut colonisation. High oxygen sensitivity of Firmicutes may explain their commonly reported decrease after oxidative burst during gut inflammation.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a anaerobní bakterie $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001421
650    _2
$a cékum $x mikrobiologie $7 D002432
650    12
$a kur domácí $7 D002645
650    _2
$a DNA bakterií $x genetika $7 D004269
650    _2
$a střevní mikroflóra $7 D000069196
650    _2
$a délka genomu $7 D059646
650    _2
$a vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování $7 D059014
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a sekvenování celého genomu $x metody $7 D000073336
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Cejkova, Darina $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Polansky, Ondrej $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Karasova, Daniela $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kubasova, Tereza $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cizek, Alois $u Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rychlik, Ivan $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. rychlik@vri.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00008181 $t BMC genomics $x 1471-2164 $g Roč. 19, č. 1 (2018), s. 561
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30064352 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190107 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190108130148 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1364573 $s 1038627
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 19 $c 1 $d 561 $e 20180731 $i 1471-2164 $m BMC genomics $n BMC Genomics $x MED00008181
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190107

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...